Codebreaker Posted April 24, 2005 #1 Share Posted April 24, 2005 The Algonquians Indians of the east coast are part of a 200 tribal indian nation. The tribe claims that they are from, the land of the rising sun. The tribe traces it origins to the Giants, who came from the Atlantic Sea, and freed their people from the trees. The Great Hare who sprang from the land of the rising sun and formed a bountiful world for people to inhabit. The imperishable sacred lands of the Dawnlands. The soil was red and the tribe had saved part of this soil prior to the white man coming to America for the first time. They told these white men, of the story of there history, and they did not believe them. The settler wanted the indians lands, they did not care about indian culture. The settlers pushed there religions of on the indians, destroyed there culture, and rewrote history them selves, there version. For those in power write history. The American Indians of the West coast, and the American Indians of the East coast are not from the same blood lines. The Algonquians did not cross the barring straists as some scientist once believed. The two groups of people are of different races. The Clovis spear heads found in Algonquian territory date to 40,000 B.C This predates. The Folsom spear head of the West coast Indian by 1000's of years. Also look at these tribal names. Abenaki / Wabanaki / Amalicite. Just to name a few. The Amalikite fought with the Hebrews in Egypt during the time of Moses. Also the first Karnak was in Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativechick1989 Posted April 24, 2005 #2 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Your post is very interesting; I am a Native from the Northern U.S. I also read awhile back, that archaeologists found evidence of Native Americans some where in the south that predate the Ice Age. So history is starting to dismiss the Bering Strait theory. As for bloodlines, I've never studied deep into Native American lineage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vulturetotem Posted April 25, 2005 #3 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I saw some show that said that some of our ancestors crossed the Bering straits when it was an ice-bridge (not a land bridge yet). This may be true but it does not explain the of dates of some of the things found in So. amer. I have never heard that the east and west coast nat. amer. were seperate races. I doubt that the ice-bridge theory, would explain that either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativechick1989 Posted April 25, 2005 #4 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I saw some show that said that some of our ancestors crossed the Bering straits when it was an ice-bridge (not a land bridge yet). This may be true but it does not explain the of dates of some of the things found in So. amer. I have never heard that the east and west coast nat. amer. were seperate races. I doubt that the ice-bridge theory, would explain that either... 589064[/snapback] I too, never heard of the east & west Natives not being of the same race. And speaking of the Bering Strait, there probably were some Native ancestors who did across during the ice age. But like you said, the ice bridge theory may not be able to explain the dates of artifacts found in the south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undefined_innocence Posted April 25, 2005 #5 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stixxman Posted April 25, 2005 #6 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Your post is very interesting; I am a Native from the Northern U.S. I also read awhile back, that archaeologists found evidence of Native Americans some where in the south that predate the Ice Age. So history is starting to dismiss the Bering Strait theory. As for bloodlines, I've never studied deep into Native American lineage. 588404[/snapback] archeologists have also found examples of almost every race having visited this part of the world at some time in the pre recorded history of man. Also if you look at tha haida or Salesh native tribal history you will find a very interesting story of thier travels that lead them to the west coast of canada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativechick1989 Posted April 25, 2005 #7 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 25, 2005 #8 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativechick1989 Posted April 25, 2005 #9 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know 589519[/snapback] Exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. 420 Posted April 25, 2005 #10 Share Posted April 25, 2005 i got this buddy at work who is a chunk native american. He can't grow facial hair, and he is the biggest lightweight I've ever seen. He gets wasted off like three beers and hes a pretty big guy. He spent about 2 hours in my bathroom the other night after a couple rum and coke bongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativechick1989 Posted April 25, 2005 #11 Share Posted April 25, 2005 i got this buddy at work who is a chunk native american. He can't grow facial hair, and he is the biggest lightweight I've ever seen. He gets wasted off like three beers and hes a pretty big guy. He spent about 2 hours in my bathroom the other night after a couple rum and coke bongs. 589757[/snapback] What does this have to do with lineage or alternative history? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinger Posted April 26, 2005 #12 Share Posted April 26, 2005 check out the genographic project at http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/ Lots of info and maybe an answer to some of your questions will become available as the project proceeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahzi Posted April 26, 2005 #13 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know 589519[/snapback] Correct me if I'm wrong, But I believe I ahve heard tales of People from Asia reaching Hawaii in Bamboo Rafts, That's got to be farther than just across the atlantic.... .... But like I said, I could be wrong about this whole raft thing...confusing my legos with my History books... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 27, 2005 #14 Share Posted April 27, 2005 (edited) Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know 589519[/snapback] Correct me if I'm wrong, But I believe I ahve heard tales of People from Asia reaching Hawaii in Bamboo Rafts, That's got to be farther than just across the atlantic.... .... But like I said, I could be wrong about this whole raft thing...confusing my legos with my History books... 590468[/snapback] thats another of the mysterious white gods connections that you're talking about, same as at easter island. The hawaains are related to polynesians iirc or the polynesians are related to hawaains one way or the other Edited April 27, 2005 by marduk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugaree Posted April 27, 2005 #15 Share Posted April 27, 2005 the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines Not sure how that information backs up the idea that North and South American Indians are not closely related--North American Indians do not have group B either. Granted, North American Indians have group A while South American Indians do not, but Australian Aborigines have group A. Wouldn't that make Aborigines more closely related to Cherokees? Not very likely, but the logical conclusion if we are just looking at blood types. Here's a site with good information about worldwide distribution of blood types. Note what that site has to say about the Diego system of blood typing- only Native Americans and East Asians are Diego positive, suggesting a close relationships. Aus. Aborigines are Diego-negative. Hawaains are Polynesians. I don't think they got to Hawaai on rafts; they are believed to have come in the typical Polynesian longboat dugout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 27, 2005 #16 Share Posted April 27, 2005 the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines Not sure how that information backs up the idea that North and South American Indians are not closely related--North American Indians do not have group B either. Granted, North American Indians have group A while South American Indians do not, but Australian Aborigines have group A. Wouldn't that make Aborigines more closely related to Cherokees? Not very likely, but the logical conclusion if we are just looking at blood types. Here's a site with good information about worldwide distribution of blood types. Note what that site has to say about the Diego system of blood typing- only Native Americans and East Asians are Diego positive, suggesting a close relationships. Aus. Aborigines are Diego-negative. Hawaains are Polynesians. I don't think they got to Hawaai on rafts; they are believed to have come in the typical Polynesian longboat dugout. 593267[/snapback] i wasn't saying they weren't related. I was just throwing the aboriginal blood into the mix. They're all interrelated in some degree as far as I can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahzi Posted April 28, 2005 #17 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know 589519[/snapback] Correct me if I'm wrong, But I believe I ahve heard tales of People from Asia reaching Hawaii in Bamboo Rafts, That's got to be farther than just across the atlantic.... .... But like I said, I could be wrong about this whole raft thing...confusing my legos with my History books... 590468[/snapback] thats another of the mysterious white gods connections that you're talking about, same as at easter island. The hawaains are related to polynesians iirc or the polynesians are related to hawaains one way or the other 592775[/snapback] in regards to the white Gods Connection, I had a book that talked about this, but it was a little old(the binding disintegrated when I opened it), so I don't really know how accurate it was...but it did give alot of coincidences.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 28, 2005 #18 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Some many things left unsolved. Maybe a few people got really lucky and made little rafts and by some miracle, they made it? Its a thought. Sounds impossible, but.. a thought nontheless. 589398[/snapback] That's a good point, and surely ancient cultures/peoples could have traveled by rafts. But all I heard during history lessons, was that the Native Peoples traveled across the Bering Strait. 589497[/snapback] the blood groups of south american indians and australian aborigines contains no group b at all The tierra del fuegans that lived at the tip of south america until very recently were full blooded aborigines more than one route to the americas y'know 589519[/snapback] Correct me if I'm wrong, But I believe I ahve heard tales of People from Asia reaching Hawaii in Bamboo Rafts, That's got to be farther than just across the atlantic.... .... But like I said, I could be wrong about this whole raft thing...confusing my legos with my History books... 590468[/snapback] thats another of the mysterious white gods connections that you're talking about, same as at easter island. The hawaains are related to polynesians iirc or the polynesians are related to hawaains one way or the other 592775[/snapback] in regards to the white Gods Connection, I had a book that talked about this, but it was a little old(the binding disintegrated when I opened it), so I don't really know how accurate it was...but it did give alot of coincidences.... 594434[/snapback] A good judge of a books accuracy is which authors name appears on the cover which is on yours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugaree Posted April 28, 2005 #19 Share Posted April 28, 2005 i wasn't saying they weren't related. I was just throwing the aboriginal blood into the mix. They're all interrelated in some degree as far as I can see. 594102[/snapback] Sorry. I misinterpreted you, as well as misidentified you. I didn't mean to malign either you or nativegirl! Sure, Australians and Terra del Fuegons are related. Everyone's interrelated, mitrochrondical Adam and Eve and all that. But I'd want to see more evidence before I directly linked the two aboriginal peoples. Did you read Oppenheimer's The Real Eve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 28, 2005 #20 Share Posted April 28, 2005 i wasn't saying they weren't related. I was just throwing the aboriginal blood into the mix. They're all interrelated in some degree as far as I can see. 594102[/snapback] Sorry. I misinterpreted you, as well as misidentified you. I didn't mean to malign either you or nativegirl! Sure, Australians and Terra del Fuegons are related. Everyone's interrelated, mitrochrondical Adam and Eve and all that. But I'd want to see more evidence before I directly linked the two aboriginal peoples. Did you read Oppenheimer's The Real Eve? 594759[/snapback] everyone makes mistakes even oppenheimer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugaree Posted April 28, 2005 #21 Share Posted April 28, 2005 No! Not Oppenheimer! The book backs a couple of points here: Oppenheimer pushes for a pre-Ice Age settlement of the Americas, and he notes some physical simularities between Aust. Aborig. and Terra del Fs--like New Guineans, they both have very "robust" features. I still don't see enough--any--evidence for an Australia to South America migration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 28, 2005 #22 Share Posted April 28, 2005 No! Not Oppenheimer! The book backs a couple of points here: Oppenheimer pushes for a pre-Ice Age settlement of the Americas, and he notes some physical simularities between Aust. Aborig. and Terra del Fs--like New Guineans, they both have very "robust" features. I still don't see enough--any--evidence for an Australia to South America migration. 594930[/snapback] you don't see any evidence the tierra del fuegans were full blooded australian aborigines they lived on the southern tip of south america is that enough ? they even account for their journey in a factual way rather than alluding to gods "No! Not Oppenheimer" I was talking about Robert you are talking about Steven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugaree Posted April 28, 2005 #23 Share Posted April 28, 2005 you don't see any evidence the tierra del fuegans were full blooded australian aborigines they lived on the southern tip of south america is that enough ? they even account for their journey in a factual way rather than alluding to gods "No! Not Oppenheimer" I was talking about Robert you are talking about Steven 594945[/snapback] What is the evidence that the T del Fs were directly descended from Aborigines? Dude, look at them. People of Tierra del Fuegans People of Australia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marduk Posted April 29, 2005 #24 Share Posted April 29, 2005 (edited) you don't see any evidence the tierra del fuegans were full blooded australian aborigines they lived on the southern tip of south america is that enough ? they even account for their journey in a factual way rather than alluding to gods "No! Not Oppenheimer" I was talking about Robert you are talking about Steven 594945[/snapback] What is the evidence that the T del Fs were directly descended from Aborigines? Dude, look at them. People of Tierra del Fuegans People of Australia. 595826[/snapback] i expect that you also think the olmecs were negroid because of their noses. You'll also discover that the tierra del fuegans intermixed with native south american tribes so at the turn of the 19 century there were only two full blooded tierra del fuegans left The tierra del fuegans weren't particularly popular wth Charles "apeman" Darwin either because he'd never seen anything that looked so savage. remind you of Indians ? or aborigines of course he was slightly bigoted because he believed it was possible to trace a persons bloodline just by looking at them. comprende ? Edited April 29, 2005 by marduk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugaree Posted April 29, 2005 #25 Share Posted April 29, 2005 Which brings us back to the question of what is the evidence that the T del Fs were directly descended from Aborigines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now