Ratte, on 22 August 2011 - 08:58 AM, said:
Doesn't this new sign BS only apply to people born after 2006 or something like that?
First Pluto isn't a planet anymore and now I'm a d@mn Virgo. Unh-uh, honey. I'm a Libra now and a Libra for ever. (At least until I die anyway)

(Credit for above picture goes to "perishing-twinkie" on DA. Thought it suited my comment and would get a chuckle out of anyone who's seen Sailor Moon)
And doesn't this throw the whole element crap out of wack? What the heck element is the new guy?
Nope, Sailor Pluto is on maternity leave: she's expecting baby Chiron to arrive in any moment: it's not a moon...it's also a dwarf planet!

(I dare you to google pregnant Sailor Moon artwork...go ahead, ROFL!) There's a Sailor Earth and sailor Dark Moon in the animated series.
But in ancient astrology with high inaccuracy by not knowing Venus is the same planet: they mentioned the two Venuses: an "Evening Star" (
Hesperus or Western star) and the "Morning Star" (
Lucifer or Lost Angel) when Venus reappeared in the opposite direction.

In ancient Gaul (now France), a small tribal hut on an isle in the Seine River called Paris was thought to be named for Venus, and the inhabitants called it "Phari" or "Varae" - their patron female deity. When the Romans arrived they changed the spelling to Paris and later early Christians came to Gaul, they thought she's the devil and made them forget about her (but the city is still "Gay Parree").
Astrologers declare we have 12-15 celestial bodies: two of them are most dominant: the Sun and Moon, 8 true planets and 5 dwarf planets...each one rules 12 signs and 1, 2 or 3 "ParaZodiac"al signs - Ophiuchus, Orion and Centaurus. (The designated elements, genders and positions are unknown, probably are neutral signs) when the planets and other celestial bodies are known to crossed them on occassion, or will increasingly be jetting within these constellations as the eliptic changes and the North Astronomical Pole shifts a few degrees (Polaris in Ursa Minor - The little bear, is no longer the "North Star") will definitely alter the latitude and longitude coordinates of constellations.
I think the Greek/Roman or Western astrology differ greatly from the Eastern kind used in India and Persia/Mesopotamia. It has to do more with the position the Earth was in when the Sun rose each 21st day of the solar month. The Sun may be, for example, on the 21st of January, enters the sign of Capricorn, but the earth was in Aquarius below the horizon...and some astrologers declared a cusp date for February 14-16, my birthdate will make me more a Capricorn but still an Aquarius...or the old calendar, I'm more of a Pisces. But be in mind 1980 is a leap year so it affects the actual correct date of when the sun enters and leaves a zodiac sign.
Edited by DeMikeDe, 22 October 2011 - 08:01 PM.