Myles, on 26 October 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:
I assume it is this way so that someone cannot change their posts and deny posting what they originally posted. Is that correct?
Maybe the time can be increased to 2-4 hours.
That is one reason. There is a very good reason to limit the amount of time that a post can be edited, I have seen sites where a poster has got angry and systematically removed all the text from all of their posts. It is not only effectively a form of vandalism, as it ruins topic after topic, but is unfair on the other, well behaved, members.
One hour is considerably more generous than some forums allow. I have seen sites where you can only edit a post within 15 minutes of making it.
The thing is that what ever time limit is set someone will want longer. If Saru changes it to 2 or 4 hours what happens if you don't notice a mistake until 5 hours later? Or 12? Or 24?
In most cases an hour is more than enough to correct a mistake. If you notice a mistake after that then making another post clarifying your error should not present a problem.
Edited by Waspie_Dwarf, 27 October 2012 - 06:28 PM.