226 replies to this topic

[zoser]

On the 3rd pic look to the left approx 1 inch above the horizon (that's Jersey visible on the horizon looking in a SE direction).

[Sakari]

Zoser, you are by far the King of Hijacking threads to make them your own........

No, you are the God of Hijacking threads.....

Edited by Sakari, 09 November 2012 - 09:46 PM.

[HerNibs]

Can some one tell me how it's NOT a toy/model blimp?

And if it isn't visible to the naked eye...how does he know where to film?

Nibs

Ok, this is from Utah but...you get the idea.

[Amerix]

Looks like an Airship (LEMV) designed by Northrop Grumman.  Believe me.  It's quite terrestrial.

[booNyzarC]

zoser, on 09 November 2012 - 07:20 PM, said:

I don't buy it Mr B.  For a start I have five photos with the object.  If it were bugs I would expect to see more than one bug on at least one shot.  This is not the case and each of the five shots has only one object.

That Denver object is no bug.

The very suggestion bugs me.

[DONTEATUS]

Its not bug,bugs,insects,or even potatoes ! IMO its just a as it looks to be ! UFO. any takers?

[Sakari]

booNyzarC, on 09 November 2012 - 11:02 PM, said:

                                                        

[synchronomy]

zoser, on 09 November 2012 - 09:25 PM, said:

On the 3rd pic look to the left approx 1 inch above the horizon (that's Jersey visible on the horizon looking in a SE direction).

Ok...I see why I missed it.  I thought it was a dustmite on my monitor.

So where are you going with this?
Personally, I'd say bugs or birds is what you have here.

[synchronomy]

booNyzarC, on 09 November 2012 - 11:02 PM, said:

Dear God.  I almost peed myself when I scrolled down to see that!
10/10 for originality and 10/10 for creativity.

So...I take it you think we're looking at bugs eh?

[zoser]

Sakari, on 09 November 2012 - 09:45 PM, said:

Zoser, you are by far the King of Hijacking threads to make them your own........

No, you are the God of Hijacking threads.....

As long as you are enjoying it all.  Please feel to contribute to the thread in any constructive way.

[zoser]

synchronomy, on 10 November 2012 - 04:06 AM, said:

Ok...I see why I missed it.  I thought it was a dustmite on my monitor.

So where are you going with this?
Personally, I'd say bugs or birds is what you have here.

A bird has wings.  There were no bugs around that day that we noticed.  It's the temperate northern hemisphere not the sub-tropics.

[zoser]

Just let me put in few more little points in response to my critics:

For a start more damage has been done to put and an end to threads in the way of rubbishing the OP with cynicism, ridicule or school boy banter than I could ever manage to do by uploading a few pictures with black objects on them.

Those people know who they are; it doesn't need me to point out what is plainly obvious.

If a thread takes on a slightly different turn with other material that needs investigating, then so be it.  I won't be put off by cynics shouting out 'bugs' for one minute.  That may well satisfy them but it will never satisfy me.

Just because there isn't an object in the picture that looks like the size of the Enterprise does not make the object any less interesting from a UFO point of view.  If anyone has the wit to look at the trends in ufology over the last 10 years I would have thought they would have realised that objects that are being seen are smaller in size these days.

I'm sure with a bit of personal adding up that one could have reached that conclusion; but that's for them.  The object in the Denver video is one such good example.

The other thing that is blatantly obvious is that as soon as a case presents itself for which there is no explanation one of two things happen:  The skeptics refrain from posting altogether, as though affected by some mass walk out, or they post ridiculing graphics or similar cynical remarks.

I stand against that.

I value anyone who presents interesting and original cases, easily explainable or otherwise, because we all learn.  

So the challenge is still there I'm afraid; no the Denver object is not a bug, neither is the anomaly on the Sark photos and to try and dismiss the case as easily as that is not doing justice to the OP or indeed the subject.

So in my adding up there are at last two cases that stand proud as unexplained smoking gun type evidence:

The Denver Case and the Denbigh case in Wales of Jan 2012 (see TT thread).

This forum really is starting to get interesting.

Be back in a few hours.

z

[Coffey]

This is the news report of it and the "Aviation expert" clearly states it is not a bug, plane, helicopter or anything he knows of.

[Sky Scanner]

Coffey, on 10 November 2012 - 02:36 PM, said:

This is the news report of it and the "Aviation expert" clearly states it is not a bug, plane, helicopter or anything he knows of.

Isn't this the same aviation expert that had his license revoked for lying?

Also, he flew planes and gave training seminars (from what little i've read), how does that make him an expert in video analysis? ...because tbh, unless he can analyse that video in order to determine distances, size, speed etc, then i'm not sure his opinion is any more credible then yours or mine.

[Sky Scanner]

HerNibs, on 09 November 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

Can some one tell me how it's NOT a toy/model blimp?

And if it isn't visible to the naked eye...how does he know where to film?

Nibs

Ok, this is from Utah but...you get the idea.

I want one of them, no really I do.