skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
Just presenting the facts.
Again, and again, and again, and again..................
skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
Mogul balloons were occasionally recovered by civilians within the U.S., not in the Soviet Union. One Mogul balloon was recovered by a lone policeman in Flatbush, after the balloon snagged itself on the roof of a tarvern. The Soviet's first nuke blast was discovered by a modified B-29, not a Mogul balloon. As I've said before, Mogul balloons were nothing more than unclassified research balloons.
And this affects what I said how?
Big clue - it does not. And you are 100% wrong about the classification of the project, it was the balloons that could not be classified. How do you classify a 600 foot balloon train floating over a populated area? You cannot. Hence the compartmentalisation.
This is the bit you always struggle with.
skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
The data gather by Project Mogul balloons was for research purposes only.
To see if it was a viable method, and it was better than predecessors, it is just that it was superseded yet again. And?
skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
That doesn't make any sense considering that even the name; Project Mogul was not classified, so there was no need to ccompartmentalize simple unclassified research balloons.
Try wrapping your head around this yet agin.
Project MOGUL was classified. The Ballon trains were not.
skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
Well, what does history have to say about that?
That the project was superseded, like all projects eventually are. That is why we call the change progress.
skyeagle409, on 27 May 2011 - 07:49 AM, said:
As I've said before, the Air Force mislead the Public on Project Mogul. The Soviet's first test was detected by an airplane, not a Mogul balloon train.
No they did not, you just do not understand Project MOGUL. Such is quite evident in your posting. Just because the projects successor managed to do what MOGUL was designed to do changes nothing. You are simply doing your best to dirty the name of the USAF. Shameful to rag on what you claim to be be your ex employer with no good reason like that.
We have discussed this millions of times, you just want to flame someone on Roswell as is painfully obvious from your difficulty in keeping your word in the BE thread. You are really boring me with this same conversation yet again, bother someone else with repetition would you?
Edited by psyche101, 27 May 2011 - 08:03 AM.