OverSword, on 18 May 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:
Nothing but claptrap despite the patents taken out for the process
Which patents exactly? Ones for crop-dusting, or the idea that we could change the planet's climate by 'stuff' introduced at high altitudes? neither of those are what is being claimed by 'chem'trail conspiracists. Please be specific, and then explain how this patent is evidence for the large scale spraying claimed by 'chem'trail proponents.
Quote
the footage of jets spraying them
Please explain the difference between a chemtrail and contrail and how you identified these trails as NOT contrails.
Quote
and my own eyes wittnesing them criscrossing the sky?
And what the heck else should they do, as multiple passenger jets at contrail levels travel the same paths, and the upper level winds displace the trails sideways between flights?
Quote
I grew up in what used to be known as Jet city, I know what a contrail looks like
Please explain the difference between a contrail and chemtrail, with CITED illustrations.
Quote
and how long they last before dissapating (10-15 minutes).
Oh, NO. Please tell me you didn't say that... Listen carefully...
At altitudes of (usually) over 25,000feet, the conditions are OFTEN conducive to contrails. (And CLOUDS, because that essentially is what a contrail is). As a jet passes through the upper atmosphere, introducing LOTS of water vapour (and a small amount of combustion residue) one of three things WILL happen:
1. It will leave NO, or very short trails. (that will happen when the conditions are not right, ie the humidity, dewpoint, pressure and temperature are NOT causing 'saturation')
2. It will leave trails that very gradually dissipate (ie the conditions are near saturation)
3. It will leave trails that last for long periods, or that grow into banks of cirrus clouds (if the conditions are at or over saturation or 'supersaturated')
Feel free to dispute any of that with logic, but it is correct. Not only that, but it is the exact same process that causes cirrus clouds - the only difference being that 'normal' cirrus clouds develop without the need for introduction of vapour via a jet exhaust.
If anyone states that contrails always dissipate, they are effectively saying that clouds CANNOT exist - because clouds form using the exact same process as a contrail, and they develop into cloud banks in exactly the same way that contrails can cause.
This is REALLY basic meteorology..
Quote
Chemtrails definetly exist. Exactly what they are composed of or what they are for is the question.
At ground level for crop-dusting, and at cloud levels for rain seeding, yes, they occasionally do. But if you claim there is a large scale clandestine chemtrail program underway, answer me this: WHY has no-one ever been able document a trail existing where weather conditions would make it impossible?
It's easy to positively identify aircraft over US airspace using Flightaware and similar. From that you can also get their altitude, verifiable by simple checks against flight paths and normal flight trajectories. And then you can use one of the high level weather recording services, like the excellent one provided by the University of Wyoming.
So with an ordinary camcorder and a bit of evidence of where you are and when you are filming, you could prove a contrail is something else. Yet no-one has. Not even the poster boys for chemtrails, Carnicom and Thomas (who still haven't told anyone what happened to the $6K they collected for upper air sampling that never went ahead..). It's a topic for charlatans preying on the ill-informed.
The trails are CONtrails. Provably so. You claim chemtrails? Collect the simple data to prove it. You will be disappointed to find that your trail-leaving flights are in conditions that are just right for contrails.
They look like a duck, they waddle like a duck, they quack like a duck, and they are in duck country. So they are.. ?