Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 2 votes

Euthanasia-For or Against


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

Poll: Euthanasia-For or Against (32 member(s) have cast votes)

euthanasia-for or against

  1. Yes I am for it (30 votes [93.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 93.75%

  2. No I am against it (2 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1    ali smack

ali smack

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 839 posts
  • Joined:28 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wertham

  • If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:05 AM

What are your opinions of Euthanasia. Are you for or against it?
Personally I am against it for a number of reasons:
I think if you "assist" in someone's death, you are killing them, which makes you a killer.
It's a start of a slippery slope, where once you make it legal in UK. It may very well be expected whether people are very getting old and very ill, and suffering from illnesses, they would be expected to be "euthanised".
people could quite easily pressure ill and mentally unstable/mentally retarded people to get euthanasia.
the argument people make about animals been put down isn't valid. Animals are not people and can't kill themselves.
it could give doctors more power where they could pressure people into euthanasia.


#2    Timonthy

Timonthy

    Placid

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,783 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Aust.

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:12 AM

I'm for it, if it's a conscious and justified decision from both parties. It would need to be regulated to an extent eg. psychological & physical assessment, and contracts signed before the act for legal reasons.

As for the 'makes you a killer' part, I would like to think if I had someone I loved living unbearably and suffering with no hope of recovery, that I could help them. I wouldn't feel like a killer.

Edit: In comparison to someone's life support being turned off who may be suffering no pain in their unconscious state, it seems irrational to not let a living and conscious person make that decision for themselves while suffering.

Edited by Timonthy, 13 February 2013 - 01:15 AM.

Posted Image


#3    voidla

voidla

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 307 posts
  • Joined:15 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:15 AM

People kill themselves. That is their birth right and choice. We should be able to assist this need in the most severe cases and it must be the cleanest and most pain free way possible.
Why should you deny someone's choice because of your own selfishness?

Everything and nothing is impossible.

It makes sense both are what makes each other.

#4    BNDGK

BNDGK

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 169 posts
  • Joined:13 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:North Carolina

  • "The world was hers for the reading"

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:24 AM

I agree with voidla, if its your choice then who can take that away? Why let someone die slowly if they chose to end it right away? It doesn't make you a killer if you end a persons misery by their own choice.

“Still round the corner there may wait, A new road or a secret gate,
And though I oft have passed them by,
A day will come at last when I, Shall take the hidden paths that run,
West of the Moon, East of the Sun.”

#5    Professor Buzzkill

Professor Buzzkill

    Integrity is all we have

  • Member
  • 2,598 posts
  • Joined:20 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:White Cloud

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:31 AM

I am for it in certain circumstances, as i believe anyone would be if they went through a similar situation as me.

My grandfather, a WW2 verteran, passed away in 2011 after a stroke. He had severe dementia and barely recognized his family for the last few years of his life. After the stroke he lost the ability to swallow. The medical staff tried to feed him through a tube, but he kept on removing it as he couldn't understand what it was being used for, and was obviously uncomfortable. The staff were worried that he would remove the tube while they were feeding him, causing the food to get into his lungs. We therefore had to watch him starve to death slowly over a week, in a confused yet sedated state, in which i can say was an incredibly undignified way to die for such a great man.

I would have gladly administered a lethal dose of morphine to him myself if i had the option, as i would hope my children would do for me if i was in the same state. I trust my family to mke that decision for me.


#6    pitchp

pitchp

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 210 posts
  • Joined:20 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male

  • "I go when I want to go. To prolong life would be tasteless"
    Albert Einstein

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:39 AM

Everyone should have a right to leave this world when they want to. If you are against it, you are against freedom

"The truth is out there. We are all searching for it."
   PitchP

#7    glorybebe

glorybebe

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,721 posts
  • Joined:24 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Canada

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:52 AM

There is no way that I would want have my family watch me suffer in great pain when it could be ended.  I wouldn't want my daughter to remember me as a bedridden almost corpse sedated out of my mind because I was so far gone with a terminal illness.  I refuse to do that to her.  Also, I wouldn't want her to suffer if it was her that was dying.  Why should we cause our loved ones such suffering before they leave this life?  I find that the most inhumane thing ever.

Save the Earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!

#8    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,967 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:01 AM

If I knew that I only had a limited time left due to disease and that this time would be horribly painful and costly to my family - and even my insurance - I would prefer to just be helped to go to sleep.  We do this for sick/injured animals - why not for a human being?  There are drugs out there that could do exactly this that could be taken by mouth.  This WILL be an option before the baby boom has completely died off due to the inability or lack of desire of the younger gen to care for them.  No harm, no foul.....

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#9    Sean93

Sean93

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 725 posts
  • Joined:24 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ireland

  • WRATH

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:28 AM

For.

Don't get these idiots who say "No, that's unjust a cruel, life is sacred." While staring a dying and horribly suffering person in the face. We put dogs down don't we? Why can't we have the compassion to end the suffering of ourselves, I don't get all this Suffering = Enlightenment bull****.

"Be peaceful, be courteous, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery."

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

#10    White Unicorn

White Unicorn

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 749 posts
  • Joined:19 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:53 AM

View Postvoidla, on 13 February 2013 - 01:15 AM, said:

People kill themselves. That is their birth right and choice. We should be able to assist this need in the most severe cases and it must be the cleanest and most pain free way possible.
Why should you deny someone's choice because of your own selfishness?

I'm not against it, each circumstance is different.

One of my grandfathers had an agonizing death with multiple myelomia. Had nature took it's course he would have died from a heart attack before the real pain and lingering illness set in.  My grandmother told the doctors "heroic measures" were fine since he wasn't sick from cancer yet.  He had a few good months but my grandfather was very angry with her for doing that and blamed her when he lingered in pain, bedfast and skeletal for six months. His last words were begging someone to give him something to end it.

Some people can bounce back from terminal things after being really sick and even in a coma. They or their family should have the choice of when it is right for them or how long to give them a chance for a recovery no matter how remote.

My father was a fighter who cheated death more than once. He was in a coma for 3 months after heart failure, chronic leukemia and a peritonitis from a ruptured colon. My mom would not let go until month 4  for some reason. He came out of it, and lived fairly normally for years!   He was resusitated 3 times all told.  He had heart disease, diabetes, and kidney failure after but had 3 good days as he called them a week during the dialysus of the following 7 years.  The last time he probably could have bounced back too knowing him! He told me this time was different and he wanted to be let go after a month and to pull all plugs and treatment if they said the gangrene and strep infection would take his foot above the ankle or if he'd lose his hands. We took him to another state's burn unit which let us disconnect and they also provided a pain cocktail of drugs that he went peacefully and in no pain! I am surprised he was able to remain conscious through the ordeal but he did until his last days.  The hospital where he was first did nothing for the pain because it wasn't legal to increase the doses and they didn't know the burn unit's methods. The burn unit knew exactly how to mix and alter the drugs to work. He wasn't euthanized but he was disconnected from all life support but an IV for hydration and nurishment.  


I believe whole heartedly in be able to chose either way.  I am very concerned about the outcome of it becoming common practice though. Poor people will not have the same medical care to even make an informed choice.

Governments might tend to take the easy way out just like some do abortions. The right to lifer's forget, most of the girls probably would opt for life if they had the means to provide or adopt out, but abortion is made the easiest option. Don't need more clinics you need more alternates available!

I think the same is true with euthanasia a right to choice, however I can't help getting visions of it turning into some sort of macabe thing out of "Logan's Run".  Just like cancer, here's your only options that the insurance will pay. It's not a true freedom of choice in the end for everyone unless you have money.    




#11    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:54 AM

Especially for politicians. Serve one term in office then one in prison then euthanasia.


#12    pallidin

pallidin

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,381 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:01 AM

I agree. Terminal suffering is something I would not like to go through.
Now, if some type of advanced pain-killer was available so that I could die in relative peace, fine.

But none exists.

I know several friends who died of cancer, yet even given high doses of morphine, still suffered a very painful death.

So, until they come up with something really effective, I'm all for euthanasia for myself.


#13    White Unicorn

White Unicorn

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 749 posts
  • Joined:19 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:30 AM

View Postpallidin, on 13 February 2013 - 03:01 AM, said:

I agree. Terminal suffering is something I would not like to go through.
Now, if some type of advanced pain-killer was available so that I could die in relative peace, fine.

But none exists.

I know several friends who died of cancer, yet even given high doses of morphine, still suffered a very painful death.

So, until they come up with something really effective, I'm all for euthanasia for myself.

Morphine doesn't work for sure, it just dulls it. I was very gratefully to the doctor who said contact a burn unit since they specialize in reducing extreme pain.  I know I had surgery with a localized injected drug and had surgery while awake, you feel your limb but you don't feel pain. It was amazing watching them break bones and repair torn ligaments! Told me the drug would cause me to forget the experience but I didn't.  It was like novacaine but without the numbness.  The anathesialogist told me there were many ways to severe nerves in severe pain cases, because I asked him why they didn't use it in cancer patients like my grandad.  There's way more stuff out there than morphine. But they aren't in the standard medical routine yet.

I agree with you on the cancer statement, I can tell you radiation treatment has to be the most painful burning sensation depending on where you have it. I think it will soon be considered an unnecessary method. Same goes for the older chemo methods. I've known people with terminal cancer opt not to treat and seen them live just as long as the others but with a better quality of life until the pulmonary arrest sets in.

Choosing how you live or how you die should be your decision alone.    












#14    ali smack

ali smack

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 839 posts
  • Joined:28 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wertham

  • If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:38 AM

View Postpitchp, on 13 February 2013 - 01:39 AM, said:

Everyone should have a right to leave this world when they want to. If you are against it, you are against freedom
What if someone wants to go on a killing spree and shoot themselves dead or blow themselves up in a suicide bombing? Is that an acceptable way to leave this world?
I disagree. I am not against freedom at all. I just think it could never be legal in the u.k. because of all the problems regarding it. for starters. If someone euthanises someone in a mercy killing. How are we to know that the said person wanted to die if there dead? anyone can forge wills, suicide notes etc.and claim to asked them to kill them. Another problem is the mental state of the person being euthanised. There are many suicidal people who sometimes feel like killing themselves but are persuaded not to, sometimes by themselves or sometimes friends etc. Now the problem is what happens if a mentally unstable person says they want to get euthanised but then sometime later they change there mind. But there dead so they can't change there mind. people should be encouraged to not kill themselves not to kill themselves.Another problem with it could very well cause  a slipperly slope, where people persuaded mentally retarded, frail or very ill people to die, thus causing more of these people to be euthanised. It would almost certainly be a disaster. Another problem is people are saying some on who smothers someone's face is not a killer because they were asked to. You then would have to let everyone else off who asked people to do bad stuff to them.


#15    brothers

brothers

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 484 posts
  • Joined:10 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 February 2013 - 04:49 AM

My poor brother has several cancers. First was lung cancer and was successfully removed and lived for seven years. The other was colorectal cancer which was more botherson because he couldn't control the timing to go to the bathroom. The third and last cancer was a lymphoma which was the worst. Chemo and radiation and all sorts of chemicals injected didn't help. He got worst and was told he would be better off in a hospise. Ofcourse I was takeing care of my brother all my life and we lived together all our lives. Take my word when you hears the words hospise you go numb. You don't think straight and follow blindly what the doctors say. This is what makes matters worse. In my brothers case they didn't feed him and only given him drips. The nurses and doctors tell you that they don't feel hungry and they don't feel any pain but you can see him suffering inside himself. I wish that he would have went quickly but it never happened. I am sorry that I didn't ask to help him to end it faster but that being against the State and Federal government. It took 10 days for him to die and I suffered all that time with him. He passed away over a year ago now an I still feel that I didn't do enough to help him go faster to him maker and so I suffer most every day. I hope and pray that If I should get into a situation like my bothers I will have plenty of pills to take me out of this world and not suffer. I am sure that God will not be too angry at me for doing it. I have seen too many people in those nurseing homes suffering terribly and they just don't do anything to help them lead a quite life and giving them something for that wonderful night to pass into the other side. Hopefully in the to not to distant future people will be more merciful and let those poor soles  just pass. The only ones that would hate it would be the hospise personal because they will be losing lots of money keeping these poor people alive and dirty and making them suffer much more than they need be. Give them all a nice cocktail and let them sleep that sleep into the goodnight.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users