Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Massive Voter Fraud


Socio

Recommended Posts

http://watchdogwire....da-141-turnout/

Only one precinct had less than 113% turnout. The unofficial vote count is 175,554 registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county.

I think they need to take a much closer look at all the swing States, I am thinking now Obama did not win the election it was stolen for him!

Edited by Socio
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

People need to get over it, Obama won by a landslide.

Edited by Hilander
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No surprise, there was a lot of fraudulent voting going around.

http://www.sodahead....estion-3291907/

This is why Democrats are against requiring identification to vote. It’s not racist; it stops fraud.

http://twitchy.com/2012/11/06/voter-fraud-people-go-to-vote-ballots-already-cast-in-their-names-others-vote-more-than-once/

Edited by docyabut2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More examples of the pussification of America....

I do not like either one of the guys that ran, so much so I did not vote.

I do know how to handle a loss, and how to accept it though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county."

Maybe St. Lucie also has the highest count of adults with Multiple Personality Disorder. (lol)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county."

Maybe St. Lucie also has the highest count of adults with Multiple Personality Disorder. (lol)

:nw::nw::tsu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the hell is this not on NBC, CBS, ABC, or CNN news sites?.....

Has anyone shared this information with them?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen to you people. You can't even win graciously. If this is true that only one precinct within an entire county had less than a 113% voter turnout and you don't feel it's worth talking about then that's truly gross. You all claim fraud doesn't exist yet when you hear of it you bury it with gloating insults. You don't even know which if one side or both is suspect and don't care so long as you won. Sickening.

I can't get the links to open on my iPad but until the detractors prove it wrong then it will stand true. Even if it is false and there is no proof either way you are still sick for not caring one way or the other.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen to you people. You can't even win graciously. If this is true that only one precinct within an entire county had less than a 113% voter turnout and you don't feel it's worth talking about then that's truly gross. You all claim fraud doesn't exist yet when you hear of it you bury it with gloating insults. You don't even know which if one side or both is suspect and don't care so long as you won. Sickening.

I can't get the links to open on my iPad but until the detractors prove it wrong then it will stand true. Even if it is false and there is no proof either way you are still sick for not caring one way or the other.

As I sad above.....Why is this not on CNN, ABC, NBC, ABC?....

Why is Romney not calling out for justice?

Oh, and " you people "......Did you not see I do not like either candidate, so I did not vote?....I could give a rats ass who won.

Honestly, with replies like that, I hope you are not legal age to vote yet.

My God man, common sense.......

Let me help you a little more, here is the local News for that County http://www.wptv.com/

Not a thing there about this?.....Strange?

Edited by Sakari
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just looked at their returns. Having used Gems it looks to me like bad formula for the totals. If you look at each race the numbers look right. It appears that the little total at the top is counting some totals twice. No actual race has more voters than registered total.

Stupid human error. Not fraud.

Nibs

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just looked at their returns. Having used Gems it looks to me like bad formula for the totals. If you look at each race the numbers look right. It appears that the little total at the top is counting some totals twice. No actual race has more voters than registered total.

Stupid human error. Not fraud.

Nibs

Considering how snail slow they were in bringing their results out - this just makes me lol all the more. Good thing they were irrelevant to the outcome - this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here's a little phrase that might be helpful: Epistemic Closure in the newly popularized, philosophical, sense means holding fast to beliefs that are rooted in a false and insular reality despite their being outside evidence to the contrary of that belief. – It's also called cherry picking.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romney was so sure of his victory he only prepared an acceptance speech and had $25,000 worth of fireworks which he didn't have cause to use. Talk about questioning the results. This man was soooo sure of himself.

http://www.washingto...e56c_story.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/romney-scraps-fireworks-display-loss-article-1.1199047

Edited by susieice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I sad above.....Why is this not on CNN, ABC, NBC, ABC?....

Why is Romney not calling out for justice?

Oh, and " you people "......Did you not see I do not like either candidate, so I did not vote?....I could give a rats ass who won.

Honestly, with replies like that, I hope you are not legal age to vote yet.

My God man, common sense.......

Let me help you a little more, here is the local News for that County http://www.wptv.com/

Not a thing there about this?.....Strange?

Hey unless you're feeling guilty about something 'you people' was meant for who it was meant for. I didn't name names but clearly it wasnt towards you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Florida result was not needed anyway

We will know more about Florida soon;

Florida officials order partial recount in tight House race between Rep. West and Democratic challenger Murphy

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/11/florida-officials-order-partial-recount-in-tight-congressional-race-between-rep/

"There are possible irregularities in St. Lucie County," claims Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, a Florida lawyer volunteering for the West campaign who has been quoted on the issue. "On Sunday we'll have a chance to recount the early votes and that's a good start to preserving the integrity of the democratic process."

Also voting irregularities are not just happening in Florida:

Boston reports 129% voter turnout, 79% for Obama; 74% for Elizabeth Warren

http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/35319922188/voter-fraud-boston-reports-129-voter-turnout-79-for

Obama Won %108 of Registered Voters in Ohio County

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/voter-fraud-obama-won-%108-of-registered-voters-in-ohio-county/

What are the odds if this:

Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/what-luck-obama-won-dozens-of-cleveland.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ hmm... We will never know. The first link about Boston sheds some reasoning but the other places, and a full 100% Obama vote seems somewhat unlikely. Every single person, and then some, who cast votes there all think the same? We can't get 10 random people on this website to agree on anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More examples of the pussification of America....

I do not like either one of the guys that ran, so much so I did not vote.

I do know how to handle a loss, and how to accept it though.

I don't blame you.

1 side is someone who seems like a right **** and the other... Well:

Really don't understand why Obama has so much support. Oh yes I do.. He's a celebrity, that's the problem.

I'm not saying he's perfect, but the only person out of everyone I've looked into that i would vote for if I was American is Ron Paul. Only because he seems more like he knows what to with the economy and the military.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this guy is on the right track;

http://www.freerepub...s/2958274/posts

I believe that the election was stolen. All the signs pointed to a Romney/Ryan win. The enthusiasm was high in the GOP. The GOTV operation was excellent.

How then, did Obama win? I think they were running a sophisticated game of electronic vote stealing and ballot box stuffing.

What I am about to describe takes a lot of money. To me, one clue is the dog that didn’t bark: Soros. He was quiet during this election. Not a word from his puppets and minions. I vaguely thought this was odd. And now we know why. They had a stealth operation of wide-spread ballot-stuffing.

1. They “salted” the vote in rural areas in swing states like Wisconsin. Many small towns were reporting suspicious registrations. This is an great strategy because there were no flashing lights or big red flags. In addition to stuffing the ballot box in the big cities like Milwaukee and Racine, they planted extra votes around small towns in such a way as to be undetectable. This is why they fought so hard on voter ID. Lax voter ID and early balloting enabled them to register by the carload and vote for Obama in small towns. The precincts still go Republican, but not by as much. The extra margin makes the difference in a 1 point race.

2. The beauty of this strategy is that you can narrow your effort and focus your resources to just those states (and counties) where it matters.

3. I look forward to a study of the “over-vote” for president in Wisconsin and Ohio. The over-vote is the number of ballots that had votes for president but none of the down-ticket candidates. This would be an indication of the salt the small town vote strategy. The “salted” votes would only have presidential votes because the financiers of this operation just want a federal win and don’t care about the rest.

4. In states with electronic voting machines, votes were flipped and stolen. Being wise in the ways of the world tells me that the temptation to build a “back-door” into voting software is overwhelmingly attractive because you can sell that access for a lot of money. Anecdotes of machines showing Obama when Romney was selected were reported. But that probably was only a part of it. The big stealing can go on after the voting is done but before it is counted. I can envision software that takes running vote totals for a candidate and then “flips” just enough votes for the Democrat to win, but not so many as to be suspicious.

5. Executing this strategy is expensive. It has to be planned carefully. Where to stuff and by how much so it isn't detectible has to be worked out. Organizing the carloads to travel from town to town is a logistical task. An operation of this sophistication takes professional expertise to plan and execute and that takes money. Enter Mr. Soros.

If votes are timestamped I sure would like to see that data; I would think normal votes would have some time spacing between casts, but changed or "flipped" electronically would be in large chunks with less than milliseconds between each cast.

Of course a big tell would how many votes were cast with a timestamps after the poles closed.

Also if they know how many registered voters were in a district and knew how many votes were cast at the close of the pole it would be easy to know how many did not vote or unused votes they could give to a candidate which could explain some of the 100% votes. And possibly why in Florida they had 141% voter turnout, the guy in charge of "flipping" did not do the math right.

Edit: looks like it is doable;

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/2012/1026/Could-e-voting-machines-in-Election-2012-be-hacked-Yes

Could e-voting machines in Election 2012 be hacked? Yes.

"The risk of cyber manipulation of these machines is quite real," says Barbara Simons, a computer researcher and author of "Broken Ballots," a book documenting e-voting vulnerabilities. "Most people don't understand that these computer-based voting machines can have software bugs or even election-rigging malicious software in them."

There are plenty of software vulnerabilities to exploit, says Matt Blaze, a computer scientist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. In 2007, he was on a team investigating touch-screen and other voting systems for California and Ohio. The resulting study concluded "virtually every important software security mechanism is vulnerable."

Edited by Socio
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Romney's ORCA epic failure?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/08/Orca-How-the-Romney-Campaign-Suppressed-Its-Own-Vote

Both candidates had voting irregularities but exit polling combined with polling audits confirmed the outcome. Not enough to break out the tin foil hats. Bottom line, enough republicans just didn't show up. Game over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They own the system but it is collapsing so stand by for a rough ride because the next few years are gonna be real hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.