evpaustralia Posted February 6, 2016 #1 Share Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) http://youtu.be/SVRzUjG9mQ8 This is my YouTube video of EVP'S I have recorded here in Australia over time. Hope you enjoy . Google spiritsbesideme in YouTube. Sorry for round about way to view video. Worth a watch . 👻👻👻 Edited February 6, 2016 by evpaustralia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted February 6, 2016 #2 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I find audio paradroila rather banal personally, do you have any convincing evidence you which to share? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudds Posted February 6, 2016 #3 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Thank you for sharing, but unfortunately I would take everything with a pinch of salt, when it comes to spirits telling us things through EVP. Because, spirits are known to tell lies most of the time, and intend to cause confusion. And, I am also sorry to say this but, I don't find your EVP to be genuine. Spirit voices sound to me as if they have been imitated with an software effects pluggin, and also spirits do not talk for more than 1-3 seconds at a time, as they take a short break in between in a session because they use up their energy quickly!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evp Posted February 6, 2016 #4 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Closing comments on that video says a great deal to me. Much of it was overprocessed in an audio editor creating it's own questionable interpretation. There was also one example where cross contamination from peoples voices was submitted as evidence. I've heard some good examples before but this was rather unconvincing for me I'm sorry. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudds Posted February 6, 2016 #5 Share Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Much of it was overprocessed in an audio editor creating it's own questionable interpretation. In your opinion, what does over processing do to audio? and in an over processed audio, did you mean compression was applied? Edited February 6, 2016 by Hudds 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolguy Posted February 7, 2016 #6 Share Posted February 7, 2016 I had many evps on my recoder very cool stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evp Posted February 7, 2016 #7 Share Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) In your opinion, what does over processing do to audio? and in an over processed audio, did you mean compression was applied? Overprocessing is typically found by abusing the "reduce hiss" filter. It can produce it's own pareidolia by something as simple as a low sampling rate from an inexpensive audio recorder. It can be quickly identified in an audio snippet by sounding almost robotic in nature. Compression can also have it's own red herrings when snippets are processed from a compressed audio format into another compressed audio format. If you have an option to record directly into PCM wave I'd recommend it to minimize the impact in the editing process. My two present mainstays are a Marantz PMD 430 stereo analog cassette recorder, dedicated XLR cabling with dynamic/condenser phantom powered microphones and a pair of Zoom H2's one of them being a N series. On the H2's, I've turned off filtering entirely because that can also introduce issues that are a little lengthy to discuss in this thread. I record to PCM wav 44,000 Hz at 16 bit typically directly whenever possible. I never record to Mp3 unless I want to send a final cut to minimize dl/ul times. My best results seem to come from my Marantz. Adobe Audition is my preferred choice in editing. If you optimize your setup and use higher end recorders there is little need to filter. A small bit of amplification is necessary. Keep them as pure as possible. BTW Hudds I have a 20 second EVP recorded in a theater from a great now defunct team that I use in presentations with their permission. It's definitely a Class B and deteriorates quickly as to what is being said. It's definitely a oddity. You are correct that most cryptic messages only last a few seconds but as you're aware, there are always exceptions to the rule. Edited February 7, 2016 by evp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudds Posted February 7, 2016 #8 Share Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) Overprocessing is typically found by abusing the "reduce hiss" filter. It can produce it's own pareidolia by something as simple as a low sampling rate from an inexpensive audio recorder. It can be quickly identified in an audio snippet by sounding almost robotic in nature. I agree, your correct, as it's quite obvious with OP's EVP[quote name=evp' timestamp='1454818436' post='5765813] Compression can also have it's own red herrings when snippets are processed from a compressed audio format into another compressed audio format. If you have an option to record directly into PCM wave I'd recommend it to minimize the impact in the editing process. My two present mainstays are a Marantz PMD 430 stereo analog cassette recorder, dedicated XLR cabling with dynamic/condenser phantom powered microphones and a pair of Zoom H2's one of them being a N series. On the H2's, I've turned off filtering entirely because that can also introduce issues that are a little lengthy to discuss in this thread. I record to PCM wav 44,000 Hz at 16 bit typically directly whenever possible. I never record to Mp3 unless I want to send a final cut to minimize dl/ul times. My best results seem to come from my Marantz. Adobe Audition is my preferred choice in editing. If you optimize your setup and use higher end recorders there is little need to filter. A small bit of amplification is necessary. Keep them as pure as possible. Correct, I also agree with your method BTW Hudds I have a 20 second EVP recorded in a theater from a great now defunct team that I use in presentations with their permission. It's definitely a Class B and deteriorates quickly as to what is being said. It's definitely a oddity. You are correct that most cryptic messages only last a few seconds but as you're aware, there are always exceptions to the rule. Yes, indeed, there are always exceptions to the rule. I am very interested to listen to that EVP recorded in a theater, is if it's possible can you share it? Edited February 7, 2016 by Hudds 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evp Posted February 7, 2016 #9 Share Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) Sorry Hudds...I'm not blowing you off but I was only given permission to use it in presentations. If I was to share it on the net, that would be a breach of agreement. I appreciate the use and honor the original agreement. Edited February 7, 2016 by evp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudds Posted February 8, 2016 #10 Share Posted February 8, 2016 Sorry Hudds...I'm not blowing you off but I was only given permission to use it in presentations. If I was to share it on the net, that would be a breach of agreement. I appreciate the use and honor the original agreement. That's OK, I can understand evp, I wouldn't want you to breach an agreement. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whyareweallhere Posted March 7, 2016 #11 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Thank you for sharing, but unfortunately I would take everything with a pinch of salt, when it comes to spirits telling us things through EVP. Because, spirits are known to tell lies most of the time, and intend to cause confusion. And, I am also sorry to say this but, I don't find your EVP to be genuine. Spirit voices sound to me as if they have been imitated with an software effects pluggin, and also spirits do not talk for more than 1-3 seconds at a time, as they take a short break in between in a session because they use up their energy quickly!. They def use alot of energy. My spirit box is so tiny and simple but uses new batteries up after only 5 minutes of it being turned on. Coincidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whyareweallhere Posted March 7, 2016 #12 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I find audio paradroila rather banal personally, do you have any convincing evidence you which to share? Skeptics behind keyboards. Gets old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podo Posted March 11, 2016 #13 Share Posted March 11, 2016 Skeptics behind keyboards. Gets old. Blind believers who claim things but after decades of documentation have no reliable pieces of evidence to keep their theories afloat. Gets old. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whyareweallhere Posted March 12, 2016 #14 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Blind believers who claim things but after decades of documentation have no reliable pieces of evidence to keep their theories afloat. Gets old. You wouldn't believe and evidence if it was shoved down your throat. That's how close minded people work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podo Posted March 12, 2016 #15 Share Posted March 12, 2016 You wouldn't believe and evidence if it was shoved down your throat. That's how close minded people work. False. I have changed my mind plenty of times, when presented by evidence. You crying and whining that I (and others like me) won't believe your silly, unprovable theories does nothing to actially further your theories. Do you have evidence? If so, present it. If not, go cry somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galactic Goatman Posted March 12, 2016 #16 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Blind believers who claim things but after decades of documentation have no reliable pieces of evidence to keep their theories afloat. Gets old. I agree. Don't get me wrong, I want to believe, oh how I want to believe! But I am a logical minded person, and do not submit myself to blind faith. I have seen enough fake EVPs and Photos to know that the odds of finding a real ghost are depressingly low. This is why I don't like to converse with hardcore ghost site users, many of them see pareidolia and scream ghost. No matter how well you prove to them that it is just a dust mote or insect. That is what I like about UM, there is a healthy amount of skepticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted March 12, 2016 #17 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Skeptics behind keyboards. Gets old. Experts without evidence. Gets old, 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now