Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 2 votes

Pascagoula case


  • Please log in to reply
312 replies to this topic

#211    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,539 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hammerfest

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 07:16 AM

No it's not, it's a sensible suggestion based on what we do ourselves. People just try to dismiss it as Sci Fi Fantasy or use long and posh sounding words because they want to stick to their fixed opinion that the whole notion is absurd, and they don't want to consider any ideas as to how it might not be so ridiculous.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#212    topsecretresearch

topsecretresearch

    Astral Projection

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 05 April 2013 - 07:35 AM

The Pascagoula case is legit IMO. The long arms and wrinkled skin match other reports. Also the disc or elliptical shape.

An actual interview here:



Ignore all the 15 pages of spin doctoring by the usual I have a problem with aliens twisted people. Google debunking is their friend.


#213    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,033 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:08 AM

View PostColonel Rhuairidh, on 05 April 2013 - 06:46 AM, said:

So you've agreed to discount reasonable ideas, because they don't make it so easy to mock the whole notion? It does sound rather as if, since you've decided that a small craft would obviously be ridiculous for crossing the Vast Distances of Space ™, you've decided to discount any ideas in which small craft would not have to cross the Vast Distances of Space, simply because you want to stick to the idea of the ridiculousness of such a small craft? That doesn't sound a very scientific way of approaching the question, I'm afraid, if anyone was to ask me.

Are youhave=ing a conversation all by yourself are you? You do not seem to be part of this one? Back on the 27th of March Quillius and I discussed mythical motherships and I thought agreed to focus on the information we have, which is when we decided to leave dimenionsal ideas out of it as well, and focus on the ecidence that can be verified.


View Postquillius, on 27 March 2013 - 09:59 AM, said:


In the same way I cannot invoke motherships to answer the question, I cannot allow the question to stand as my answer will be restricted due to the reluctance to speculate.


We have a gentlemans agreement. Do you insist that conversation that we are having now include that which we agreed not to include? If you want to make some stuff up, knock yourself out.

What you seem to be missing is that if this is not an alien, as I suspect, what is the point of the mythical mothership? What can such a notion possibly accomplish other than offering bias to an alien conclusion? How is that a fair discussion?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#214    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,033 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:11 AM

View PostColonel Rhuairidh, on 05 April 2013 - 07:16 AM, said:

No it's not, it's a sensible suggestion based on what we do ourselves. People just try to dismiss it as Sci Fi Fantasy or use long and posh sounding words because they want to stick to their fixed opinion that the whole notion is absurd, and they don't want to consider any ideas as to how it might not be so ridiculous.

Absolute codswallop, it is not at all a sensible suggestion, it is making up paramaters to arrive at an alien conclusion, nothing more. If you feel your mythical mothership is so sensible I dare you to attempt to validate it without the use of speculation. If you cannot, mcroms link stands as a well rounded rebuttal.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#215    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,539 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hammerfest

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:14 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 05 April 2013 - 09:08 AM, said:



We have a gentlemans agreement. Do you insist that conversation that we are having now include that which we agreed not to include? If you want to make some stuff up, knock yourself out.

What you seem to be missing is that if this is not an alien, as I suspect, what is the point of the mythical mothership? What can such a notion possibly accomplish other than offering bias to an alien conclusion? How is that a fair discussion?
because it's a reasonable solution to the objection you keep insisting on as proving that this, like so many other UFO incidents, could not possibly be extraterrestrial in origin. That, i susepct, is probably why you're so keen to rule it out straight away, so you can keep insisting on yoyur "how could anything that size possibly traverse the immeasurable distances of Space™?" objection.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#216    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,539 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hammerfest

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:16 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 05 April 2013 - 09:11 AM, said:

Absolute codswallop,
No, it's not, you're just being stubborn and clinging to your objection as if you've hit on the final conclusive point that disproves the entire ET hypothesis. I'm afraid you really are being very stubborn, and refusing point blank to even consider any solutions to your objection. That really is very very stubborn.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#217    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,033 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:16 AM

View Posttopsecretresearch, on 05 April 2013 - 07:35 AM, said:

The Pascagoula case is legit IMO. The long arms and wrinkled skin match other reports. Also the disc or elliptical shape.

the 8 foot disc, yeah right, it would not have the capabilities to exit the atmosphere! What a load of junk!

Wrinkled skin os now proof of ET is it? Great Scott. What will you come up with next?

View Posttopsecretresearch, on 05 April 2013 - 07:35 AM, said:

An actual interview here:

Late to the party, been done by McGuff, who is rather good at this as a matter of fact, and already regurgitated by Bee. Bit slow there pal.

View Posttopsecretresearch, on 05 April 2013 - 07:35 AM, said:

Ignore all the 15 pages of spin doctoring by the usual I have a problem with aliens twisted people. Google debunking is their friend.

I suggest you ask Quillius, who is much, much better at this than you are. You need to get out of the 70's mate. But I kinda hope you do not, you provide quite a chuckle from time to time "Disco Stu". I think more information about this case has surfaced in the last 15 pages, than all of your contributions tied together and folded over. What have you contributed to this thread? Off yeah, rhetoric and a clip that someone else already gave us. Glad you happened along. :tu:

Google. LOL, just learned about that did you?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#218    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,033 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:23 AM

View PostColonel Rhuairidh, on 05 April 2013 - 09:14 AM, said:

because it's a reasonable solution to the objection you keep insisting on as proving that this, like so many other UFO incidents, could not possibly be extraterrestrial in origin. That, i susepct, is probably why you're so keen to rule it out straight away, so you can keep insisting on yoyur "how could anything that size possibly traverse the immeasurable distances of Space™?" objection.

Because not one has even been seen, you are worse by making up not only motherships, but cloaked motherships! Your "theory" and I am being kind here, just expands until you can say well now it's ET!. That's a joke.

You just do not wish to accept the very fact that the reports are not workable, and wish to add as many extensions as it takes to make it an alien story. If you stick to the facts, these motherships simply do not exist outside of imagination. It's why you are so insistant on invoking the mythical, because lets face it, without these mythical components, the ET idea just does not work. IN fact, I feel it is somewhat hypocritical to say the Motherships exist, but deny that very fact that we have the sky well covered.

Give me a reason to accept the mothership theory that does not sound made up, and is at least somewhat supported by more than speculation please. If you cannot do that, how are you not just making it up as you go along? Come one Colonel  money where you mouth is, why should I believe these nonsense stories are scout-ships that fly up to an invisible mothership in orbit? You ideas of Jupiter and the Kuipier belt do not work, because the "scout ship" would again still be travelling for months to get to the mothership, which again, the are too small for. You have never provided any proof, no sightings, nothing more than your personal speculation. Why would that be convincing? Because you are find of the idea?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#219    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,033 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 05 April 2013 - 09:27 AM

View PostColonel Rhuairidh, on 05 April 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:

No, it's not, you're just being stubborn and clinging to your objection as if you've hit on the final conclusive point that disproves the entire ET hypothesis. I'm afraid you really are being very stubborn, and refusing point blank to even consider any solutions to your objection. That really is very very stubborn.


I would say not as stubborn as you insisting I just believe when you have nothing more than an idea to run with. Take me up on my offer, show me some sort of proof for these motherships, instead if just making stuff up on the spot to make any story an alien one. My hypothesis is sound, the men, the beings, and the carrot heads would not even fit into an 8x8 craft let alone instruments, engines, fuels, lab equipment, you know, all the stuff they had to study Parker and Hickson with?

Go ahead, I double dog dare to you to validate this claim. Why should I believe in these mythical motherships? Because you say so?

It's just an excuse to make any story an alien one.

Edited by psyche101, 05 April 2013 - 09:27 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#220    topsecretresearch

topsecretresearch

    Astral Projection

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 05 April 2013 - 12:31 PM

View Postpsyche101, on 05 April 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:

the 8 foot disc, yeah right, it would not have the capabilities to exit the atmosphere! What a load of junk!

Wrinkled skin os now proof of ET is it? Great Scott. What will you come up with next?

Ank...wrong answer. If you listen to the actual witness interviews the craft was much larger.

Posted Image

Notice the wrinkled skin AND "long arms". Long arms have been described by many other witnesses. I could start a separate thread about that.

Also if I recall and it's in the audio interview the witnesses could not determine if the craft was a disc or elliptical shape due to it's angle.

Also it's very stupid to take every little detail so literal in hopes of debunking something. Common sense dictates every detail isn't going to be 100% accurate. It's called guesstimating or making a close approximation. People are not robots smarty pants. Stop with the spin drivel.

View Postpsyche101, on 05 April 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:

Late to the party, been done by McGuff, who is rather good at this as a matter of fact, and already regurgitated by Bee. Bit slow there pal.

I suggest you ask Quillius, who is much, much better at this than you are. You need to get out of the 70's mate. But I kinda hope you do not, you provide quite a chuckle from time to time "Disco Stu". I think more information about this case has surfaced in the last 15 pages, than all of your contributions tied together and folded over. What have you contributed to this thread? Off yeah, rhetoric and a clip that someone else already gave us. Glad you happened along. :tu:

Google. LOL, just learned about that did you?

You mean YOU need to learn more about UFOs.


#221    topsecretresearch

topsecretresearch

    Astral Projection

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 05 April 2013 - 12:57 PM

View PostColonel Rhuairidh, on 03 April 2013 - 02:44 PM, said:

God, i hate the phrase "Google is your friend". Google is not actually my friend, it's a gigantic American owned mega-corporation that crushes competition through its sheer size, and has appallingly poor customer service to users of, for example, its Youtube subsidiary. I'll try to ask again, but I don't suppose I'll be likely to get any sensible answer: how do these ISP locator things work, please?

One big problem I see with these types of forums that are a bit silly to begin with is the people debunking things (trying to appear above alien belief) don't know much about actual cases. Playing spin doctor, the discrediting game is not a good way to objectivly look at the subject matter.

I may have to stop coming to forums like UM or ATS for that reason. I'm naturally curious about the phenomenon but other people, you know, have problems with ETs or what other people believe in.


#222    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,484 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:20 PM

What the hell are we talking about here!!!! This has to be the silliest among stupid stories I have ever heard. :clap:

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#223    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 8,731 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK. There if you need me

  • Never forget that only the weak fish swim with the stream, and a lie travels half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:36 PM

View Posttopsecretresearch, on 05 April 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:

One big problem I see with these types of forums that are a bit silly to begin with is the people debunking things (trying to appear above alien belief) don't know much about actual cases. Playing spin doctor, the discrediting game is not a good way to objectivly look at the subject matter.

I may have to stop coming to forums like UM or ATS for that reason. I'm naturally curious about the phenomenon but other people, you know, have problems with ETs or what other people believe in.

If there wasn't debunkers about, all the silly stories and gobbledygook would be simply believed wouldn't it?  There is so much crap in the field of ET/UFO, and its only increased with the internet, photo-shop, cgi and similar. Debunkers, or skeptics may be the better word, look at the angles believers don't. I became a skeptic thru my ignorant acceptance of ET visitations, abductions and the many UFO tales and sightings. etc. Because I wanted to know the FACTS about ET for myself, I trudged thru 12 years now of information, going from an avid, but ill-informed believer, to arriving at a skeptic view point. Id love there to be aliens, but there just isnt ANY evidence.

There are some intriguing stories for sure, some old crackers that dont go away, but we need as always, evidence

The England team visited an orphanage in Brazil today. “It’s heartbreaking to see their sad little faces with no hope” .....said Jose, age 6.
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#224    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,539 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hammerfest

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:40 PM

View PostDBunker, on 05 April 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:

What the hell are we talking about here!!!! This has to be the silliest among stupid stories I have ever heard. :clap:
I have to say, the artists' impressions that were helpfully provided to boost the case don't really help the case, do they.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#225    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,539 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hammerfest

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:40 PM

View PostDBunker, on 05 April 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:

What the hell are we talking about here!!!! This has to be the silliest among stupid stories I have ever heard. :clap:
I have to say, the artists' impressions that were helpfully provided to boost the case don't really help the case, do they.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users