Jump to content


- - - - -

Does sea flood hold key to new medications ?


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1    Saru

Saru

    Site Webmaster

  • 18,874 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male

  • "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious." - Albert Einstein

Posted 31 January 2013 - 12:26 PM

Creatures living at the bottom of the sea could provide powerful new ways to fight infection and disease.

Phys.org said:

Sea life studies aid researchers in several ways, including the development of new medications and biofuels. Because many of these ocean animal species have existed in harmony with their bacteria for millions of years, these benign bacteria have devised molecules that can affect body function without side effects and therefore better fight disease.

Posted Image Read more...


#2    sergeantflynn

sergeantflynn

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 144 posts
  • Joined:20 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:EARTH (temporary)

  • WHY WORRY ?

Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:25 PM

Nature provides..

#3    ancient astronaut

ancient astronaut

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 214 posts
  • Joined:23 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:31 spooner street

  • It Is What It Is.

Posted 31 January 2013 - 04:12 PM

and we take away. The taking is definitely disproportionate to the giving.

Edited by ancient astronaut, 31 January 2013 - 04:15 PM.


#4    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,504 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2013 - 04:38 PM

I remember they found living sea sponges that would break bacteria's super resistence to modern antibiotic drugs. No one ever talks about that anymore though.

#5    sergeantflynn

sergeantflynn

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 144 posts
  • Joined:20 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:EARTH (temporary)

  • WHY WORRY ?

Posted 31 January 2013 - 05:52 PM

Wolverine , I agree . It will be stowed away by military/government to be used when they think fit . That means you and me have no chance .

#6    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,504 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2013 - 07:00 PM

Yeah, discovered in 2009: http://www.scienceda...90226110743.htm

#7    sergeantflynn

sergeantflynn

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 144 posts
  • Joined:20 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:EARTH (temporary)

  • WHY WORRY ?

Posted 31 January 2013 - 08:18 PM

View PostWoIverine, on 31 January 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:

Yeah, discovered in 2009: http://www.scienceda...90226110743.htm
Very good link .

#8    pallidin

pallidin

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,603 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 31 January 2013 - 08:24 PM

You know, I saw something on TV recently(sorry, can't remember where) which said that it can take 10-15 years before a new therapeutic drug can hit the market be it derived from nature or man-made entirely.

This was respect to the US and FDA approval, I think, whereas the "active ingredients(s)" are isolated, tested, re-tested, multi-year human trials, side-effect characterizations, etc... Yes, it was in relationship to how the "Big Pharms" do things under US Law.

Don't hit me for mentioning Big Pharm !! I know most of us hate them.
I'm just relaying a TV story I heard...

#9    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,504 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2013 - 08:46 PM

View Postpallidin, on 31 January 2013 - 08:24 PM, said:

You know, I saw something on TV recently(sorry, can't remember where) which said that it can take 10-15 years before a new therapeutic drug can hit the market be it derived from nature or man-made entirely.

This was respect to the US and FDA approval, I think, whereas the "active ingredients(s)" are isolated, tested, re-tested, multi-year human trials, side-effect characterizations, etc... Yes, it was in relationship to how the "Big Pharms" do things under US Law.

Don't hit me for mentioning Big Pharm !! I know most of us hate them.
I'm just relaying a TV story I heard...

It wouldn't surprise me. I don't remember which agency it was, but I read that getting new electronics to market is a process as there's testing for radioactivity, and other miscellaneous things as well. I mean...really, we need to test a nintendo for radioactivity? This wasn't the wifi enabled nintendos either. lol

Edited by WoIverine, 31 January 2013 - 08:51 PM.


#10    paperdyer

paperdyer

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 136 posts
  • Joined:04 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Carolina

  • "The place where optimism flourishes the most is the insane asylum."

Posted 31 January 2013 - 08:52 PM

Perhaps the sponges' abilities could not be easily mimiced or only worked if you would filter the person's blood through the sponge.  Interesting concept though.

#11    pallidin

pallidin

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,603 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:08 PM

View PostWoIverine, on 31 January 2013 - 08:46 PM, said:

It wouldn't surprise me. I don't remember which agency it was, but I read that getting new electronics to market is a process as there's testing for radioactivity, and other miscellaneous things as well. I mean...really, we need to test a nintendo for radioactivity? This wasn't the wifi enabled nintendos either. lol

Funny you should mention that!

It's the "planar boards" in question. Planar boards are the multi-layered substrate for the electronics... the "board" itself without any electronics.
For consumer electronics it's now 2-3 layers when it use to be 5. Not sure what the military does. I think 5 or 7(for strength)

Anyway, it is true that some planar boards emit radioactivity from ingredients in construction.. Not harmful to humans at all, I do know that.

However, radioactivity can be very harmful to the functional integrity of the semiconductor electronics placed on-top, especially memory chips.

In other words, potential data corruption, as the radioactivity switches a "0" to a "1" or the other way around.


Anyway, sorry for off-topic...

#12    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,504 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:54 PM

Very cool, thanks for the info. :tu:

#13    Yamato

Yamato

    puppy kisses!

  • Member
  • 4,320 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:17 AM

View PostWoIverine, on 31 January 2013 - 08:46 PM, said:

It wouldn't surprise me. I don't remember which agency it was, but I read that getting new electronics to market is a process as there's testing for radioactivity, and other miscellaneous things as well. I mean...really, we need to test a nintendo for radioactivity? This wasn't the wifi enabled nintendos either. lol
We should probably test everything coming out of Japan for radioactivity.
Everything you need to know about my politics, wrapped up in a song:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JSBhI_0at0

#14    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,504 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:12 PM

View PostYamato, on 01 February 2013 - 01:17 AM, said:

We should probably test everything coming out of Japan for radioactivity.

Agreed, we should definitely test now, more than ever.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users