62 replies to this topic

[monk 56]

Dear Medium Brown,

There are problems regarding your links regarding myself, i hope they are unintentional, i value the Titanic sinking as only Captain error, obviously as they thought Titanic unsinkable, there wasn't enough life boats on board, this was quickly remedied after Titanic!

I value you as a Titanic Buff, please note many could not swim in 1912, regardless who was rich or poor, the captain should have had a thought...we don't have enough lifeboats?

The Iceberg wasn't sunk by the Titanic, it was opposite!

I have no idea which iceberg sank Titanic, obviously some will try to show as below:-

The picture below only shows one side of iceberg, many think this is the "ICEBERG", think again we are not sure, even if we were sure it doesn't show both sides, was there a gentle slop on the other side?

http://www.foxnews.c...t-sank-titanic/

[monk 56]

Looking at all iceberg shapes can be valued below:-

http://www.earthlyis...com/iceberg.htm

I'm not available to any saying that i expressed a view that the the Titanic was any other than "Captain Mistake" we will never know the shape of the iceberg that hit the Titanic, but error is not thinking that some passengers couldn't have been put on this iceberg to await rescue!

Wanna argue?

Captain error has nothing to do with conspiracy, like the other sinking that i have already mentioned regarding the period 1912-1915, very suspicious!

Captain error is valued with Concordia, link below:-

http://en.wikipedia....cordia_disaster

[monk 56]

As said before i feel the sinking of "Luitania" Suspicious, link below:-

http://en.wikipedia....i/RMS_Lusitania

I feel the sinking of Titanic only Captain error, if any want to mess with me regarding conspiracy of W.W.1. be my guest, i'm waiting!!!!

[preacherman76]

Czero 101, on 01 February 2013 - 12:40 AM, said:

, since you have to pay Alex Jones for the "privilege" of listening to his show - and isn't it telling how those who those who are usually the most vocal and controversial about making sure that you know The Truth™ want you to pay them to tell you what they say should be free to anyone who wants it -

You dont have to pay anything to listen to his show. You only have to pay if you want to see the show. I listen for free all the time. In fact I have never seen any media invest in themselfs and give out things for free the way Alex does. Ive have watched every single documentary he has ever done for free. I listen to his show near daily, and have never given him a dime. Heck even the people who choose to pay to watch are allowed to have 11 others use the same password at the same time for free. If you held any other media source to the same standard, Alex would be the most free by FAR. Who do you know that waves the copy rights of every single thing They produce, and encourage people to make copies and hand them out for nothing?

[G Donnelly]

I'm going to down tools after this post....

I read a book called "The Titanic Secret" by James Steel last year.It's about a British intelligence agent who's task was to eliminate this guy and his bodyguards on the Titanic before the guy stirred something up by forming an alliance between the States and Germany.So this pre- emptied America's involvement in World War One by five years.If the guy and his bodyguards had made it to New York it wouldn't have been the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand that would have been the catalyst.If the intelligence agent has failed or lost touch they had a submarine patrolling the surrounding waters just in case.So that's what happened and the Titanic ended up being torpedoed.Even though our hero went down with the ship he managed to get on board the lifeboat that was capsized in the confusion and panic of bailing ship.It sounds like speculative fiction but it's more or less what happened.

This is as close as I've seen to an actual conspiracy involving the Titanic.You can discuss the manufactured plight of the Lituahinia with other like- minded people but I'm beat.

[Czero 101]

Medium Brown, on 04 February 2013 - 08:15 PM, said:

I'm going to down tools after this post....

I read a book called "The Titanic Secret" by James Steel last year.It's about a British intelligence agent who's task was to eliminate this guy and his bodyguards on the Titanic before the guy stirred something up by forming an alliance between the States and Germany.So this pre- emptied America's involvement in World War One by five years.If the guy and his bodyguards had made it to New York it wouldn't have been the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand that would have been the catalyst.If the intelligence agent has failed or lost touch they had a submarine patrolling the surrounding waters just in case.So that's what happened and the Titanic ended up being torpedoed.Even though our hero went down with the ship he managed to get on board the lifeboat that was capsized in the confusion and panic of bailing ship.It sounds like speculative fiction but it's more or less what happened.

This is as close as I've seen to an actual conspiracy involving the Titanic.You can discuss the manufactured plight of the Lituahinia with other like- minded people but I'm beat.

You DO realize that the book you are referring to is a WORK OF FICTION, right...?

Based on the reviews I've seen so far, it seems to have been intended more for an adolescent rather than adult audience and was written with predictable plot elements, not very well developed characters.

And please, for the love of whatever deity you follow, its L U S I T A N I A.





Cz

[G Donnelly]

Czero 101, on 04 February 2013 - 08:56 PM, said:

You DO realize that the book you are referring to is a WORK OF FICTION, right...?

Based on the reviews I've seen so far, it seems to have been intended more for an adolescent rather than adult audience and was written with predictable plot elements, not very well developed characters.

And please, for the love of whatever deity you follow, its L U S I T A N I A.






Cz

Well pardon me for breathing.

For the love of god I did  describe it as speculative fiction.
When I said "more or less" I was referring to the plot.
There was no way I was making it out as fact.
If there was any confusion it wasn't intentional on my part.
I pointed it out because it's the closest to an Illuminati plot be it fact or fiction.
It was my unique way of ripping the original premise of the thread to shreds.
I can't see why you were getting annoyed at my spelling mistake there.
It's just one of those things because I'm usually top notch.

Now I've truly done with this thread and in all likelihood this forum.

Edited by Medium Brown, 04 February 2013 - 09:16 PM.

[Czero 101]

Medium Brown, on 04 February 2013 - 09:14 PM, said:

Well pardon me for breathing.

No apologies required.

Quote

For the love of god I did  describe it as speculative fiction.

Actually, you said this:

Medium Brown, on 04 February 2013 - 08:15 PM, said:

It sounds like speculative fiction but it's more or less what happened.

Which to me translates to you saying that its sounds like its fiction, but it is really what happened, in your opinion.

Quote

When I said "more or less" I was referring to the plot.
There was no way I was making it out as fact.

Then you need to be a bit more clear, because sometimes in these types of discussions, it becomes difficult to figure out when someone is being serious or not when they aren't clear on what their position is.

Quote

If there was any confusion it wasn't intentional on my part.

Fair enough...

Quote

I pointed it out because it's the closest to an Illuminati plot be it fact or fiction.

It was my unique way of ripping the original premise of the thread to shreds.

Fair enough, too...

Quote

I can't see why you were getting annoyed at my spelling mistake there.
It's just one of those things because I'm usually top notch.

I pointed it out BECAUSE the rest of your posts appeared "top notch"... maybe I should have included a ...?

Quote

Now I've truly done with this thread and in all likelihood this forum.

Your choice, unfortunate as it may be....






Cz

Edited by Czero 101, 04 February 2013 - 09:45 PM.

[The New Richard Nixon]

I blame the iceburg for 9/11

[ali smack]

I don't think the illuminati were responsible for the sinking of the titanic to be frank

[G Donnelly]

ali smack, on 07 February 2013 - 08:27 PM, said:

I don't think the illuminati were responsible for the sinking of the titanic to be frank

Quoted for truthery!

[Dracos Nightwolf]

Ok... I actually liked this... Not so much the 9-11 part, but the thinking that one way or another it COULD of been a plot to be rid of many of the top tier holders. Not that I believe it in the slightest... But it is food for thought... Who knows, The hull could of been have been weaken during construction in one way or another and the iceburg hitting it first was just a fluke...

[musk]

wasnt the titanic full of rich people? illuminati dont kill the rich they kill the poor so the rich can have more

[Zaphod222]

Firestone66, on 28 January 2013 - 05:25 AM, said:

This is Chess, not checkers...

Actually, this sort of demented conspiracy nonsense is neither chess nor checkers but more on the IQ level of tic-tac-to.

[Likely Guy]

Zaphod222, on 25 February 2013 - 07:26 AM, said:

Actually, this sort of demented conspiracy nonsense is neither chess nor checkers but more on the IQ level of tic-tac-to.

I disagree, more like 'snakes and ladders'.