behavioralist Posted November 12, 2012 #1 Share Posted November 12, 2012 One of the oldest clear associations in psychology is between abuse in early years and psychotic behavior. One of the clearest assumptions of the masses is that psychotic behavior is a failure-trait; that success is accordingly a rational trait, so that politics is a comprehensive aptitude rather than a narrow and obsessive-compulsive one. The following is a psychology challenge, psychology being an exceptionally clear awareness of how people and their relationships work. Which of the two people described below is more committed to all three of these institutions: family, religion and state? The man who was, as a child, first abused by his father, then abused by the local religious leader, and then abused by a ranking policeman. or, the man whose presence in the home, while growing up, at some age before he graduated from school began to titillate one of his parents who tried to keep it covert, even from the child, while exploiting it (a normal family, in other words: "forbidden fruit" to only one parent while approaching puberty, if puberty did not arrive too early to be appreciated), and who went to the religious services but never knew the clergy socially, and had no encounters with the police, but just saw them as a uniformed presence in the community? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aryannatimothy Posted November 16, 2012 #2 Share Posted November 16, 2012 I always believe that man is educated first at home. Thus, whatever value, character, and attitude he has is shaped and honed mostly at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starchild1976 Posted December 12, 2012 #3 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Yet, sometimes those who refuse to believe psychotic tendancy is a failure trait tend to do better than the so called normals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
behavioralist Posted December 13, 2012 Author #4 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Competition leads to two forms of success: servile and dominant. The determination of role is Superiority Complex: those who compete well more fairlyand therefore more overtly must serve those they would otherwise find inferior for competing poorly and counting on covert means.I get an A in science, and the guy I'll be working for gets an A in blacking my Eyes and never getting expelled for it, as I would be if I blacked his Eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now