Nigel Farage challenged to a sword dual

[Still Waters]

Polish Prince John Zylinski has challenge Ukip leader, Nigel Farage to a sword duel in Hyde park over his comments on immigration - failing that, he has challenged Mr Farage to a "duel of words" on a TV debate.

The prince slammed the Ukip leader's "idiotic" blaming of immigrants for traffic jams on the M40.

http://www.telegraph...n-comments.html

[Kenemet]

I love the idea! Let them settle it like gentlemen!

[back to earth]

More of this please ... sword duel that is.

I wish people that had issues with me would challenge me to a sword duel, instead of what they seem to come up with.

Only one person has so far (we used wooden swords). He was one of my sword instructors who seemed to have a bit of an issue with some of my techniques (as his wasnt the only style / school I practised in) . Eventually he shut up the school as he was moving on. On the last day, after everyone else had left, he "See if you can kill me." And rushed at me with a blow. I just stepped forward and to the side and did a one hand extension, he ran into the tip, and I drew it back a bit not to hurt him, it stopped with the tip sideways pressing between his ribs just over the heart. he looks down and goes "Oh .... yeah .... that would have done it. "

(I also got him once before by flipping my sandal into his face as I moved in, cut up through both his arms as I passed to his side and then down through his back )

Maybe I should look up this Prince John and give him some tips .

Prob end up a boring verbal debate though .... ho hum ... that wont solve nuthin

[Shayde]

What a pity that duelling is banned. It would make the selection of either party leaders or indeed Prime Ministers a tad interesting. After all, Miliband informed us all during that Paxman interview that he is indeed "Tough enough." If he hates Cameron that much, then he really ought to strike the Tory leader with a glove, and demand satisfaction!

[Space Commander Travis]

If Mr. Z is such a patriot, why doesn't he ask why so many of his countrypersons are apparently so keen to leave Poland at the first opportunity they get? Doesn't it rather say something about hos successful the Polish government has been? Surely they can't still blame Communism. is it because the weather's better?

[spud the mackem]

If Mr. Z is such a patriot, why doesn't he ask why so many of his countrypersons are apparently so keen to leave Poland at the first opportunity they get? Doesn't it rather say something about hos successful the Polish government has been? Surely they can't still blame Communism. is it because the weather's better?

The Poles are good hard working people and very pleasant, but the reason they leave is because their Country is in a financial mess,the wages being about a quarter of U.K. wages, so they peacefully invade the U.K to earn money to send home to their families.They are not Communists and most of them are Christian. Their Gov't just has no money to better their infrastructure.

[stevewinn]

The Poles are good hard working people and very pleasant, but the reason they leave is because their Country is in a financial mess,the wages being about a quarter of U.K. wages, so they peacefully invade the U.K to earn money to send home to their families.They are not Communists and most of them are Christian. Their Gov't just has no money to better their infrastructure.

I cant label All - and im not saying what you wrote is wrong. but i can speak from personal experience, and want to put across a reality that is never mentioned. Its not politicaly correct to do so. Well, the Hard working pole notion has well and truly gone out the window where my mum lives, and where i grew up. I've witnessed the change first hand, and i can state from personal observation we are importing far from professional workers - in fact i'll go one further and say riff-raff. The road i grew up in and where my mum still lives is now at least 50% Polish. (im being conservative here) - Now a good five years after the influx started i can state without fear of contradiction the vast majority NO LONGER WORK. but the common dominator is all, and i repeat all with no exception have had a child born here. - this not only secures their right to remain status indefinitely , it also ensures state financial security for life as well.

Make no mistake about it, we had our own fairshare of riff-raff, before the influx started, but make no mistake about it, and be under no illusion we've added to it, Here im talking - the dregs of society. drug use, Alcohol abuse and anti social behaviour. The neighbours are fed up to the back teeth with the goings on and so are the police.

:edit to remove part of reply.

Edited April 14, 2015 by stevewinn

[Duke Wellington]

Polish Prince John Zylinski has challenge Ukip leader, Nigel Farage to a sword duel in Hyde park over his comments on immigration - failing that, he has challenged Mr Farage to a "duel of words" on a TV debate.

The prince slammed the Ukip leader's "idiotic" blaming of immigrants for traffic jams on the M40.

http://www.telegraph...n-comments.html

Meanwhile Poland is like a ghost town. All the youth have moved to France, Germany and the UK.

[stevewinn]

Nigel in a speech six years ago, when the wheels started gathering traction. I believe if he modified this speech for the final closing statement in the last TV debate. giving it his all, putting his passion and belief on display im sure it would convince a hell of a lot of people vote UKIP and give them a spin.

Edited April 14, 2015 by stevewinn

[Mr.United_Nations]

I used to work with Polish people, they are hard working and no one really talked to them about immigration. Compared to some other British workers i saw one who couldn't be bothered to work always moaning and that. The strange thing is people didn't mind working with different backgrounds, sometimes you here just a full on conversation

[stevewinn]

Well UKIP's Manifesto is out.

The UKIP Manifesto 2015

May 7th presents the people of Britain with an incredible opportunity.

For the first time in 100 years, there is real change on the horizon. All you have to do is vote for it.

Political party manifestos are usually filled with arbitrary, over-ambitious targets and pledges to some special interest group here or there. UKIP is different.

In this document, which should inform your choice at this election, you will find serious, fully-costed policies that reflect what our party is all about: believing in our country.

On the major issues of the day - immigration, the economy, our health service and living standards – the establishment parties have repeatedly and knowingly raised the expectations of the public, only to let us down, time and time again.

In many ways, this is where UKIP came from: a feeling that successive governments were no longer representing the will of the British people.

Now, there is something to vote for, if you believe in Britain.

If you believe that we are big enough to make our own laws, in our own parliament; if you believe we should have the sovereign right to control our own borders; if you believe that we should be fiscally responsible, and stop adding to our national debts and expecting our children and grandchildren to pay the bill, then we are the party for you.

If you believe in these things and that in this year, the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta, you believe we should seize the opportunity for real change in our politics; rebalance power from large corporations and big government institutions and put it back into the hands of the people of this country, then there really is only one choice.

If you believe in Britain, vote UKIP on May 7th.

Nigel Farage MEP

PDF https://d3n8a8pro7vh....pdf?1429096952

[Space Commander Travis]

I wouldn't mind picking up a copy of that, I'll have to see if I can pick one up. They've got an office in town, I'm sure they'll be pleased to see a potential customer.

[stevewinn]

I wouldn't mind picking up a copy of that, I'll have to see if I can pick one up. They've got an office in town, I'm sure they'll be pleased to see a potential customer.

You'd be better off just reading the PDF, Its a decent Manifesto. page 73 onwards outlines spending. I like the fact its a credible plan. because unlike the other parties they are using money that's already collected by government. The Foreign Aid budget is currently £11.4Billion a year. and this government coalition have written it into law that 0.7% of GDP has to be spent every year. to put that £11.4Billion into perspective, we are looking at a funding crisis in the NHS of £4Billion over the next four years and Defence £2Billion a year UKIP - propose to reduce Foreign Aid budget to 0.2% of GDP. that is the same level as the USA and the combined contribution of Spain and Italy.

If we reduce our Foreign Aid budget to 0.2% of GDP that's a total of £4Billion a year. Meaning we now have £7Billion to spend elsewhere. £4Billion could go to the NHS. £1Billion could go to Defence meaning we keep to the 2% of GDP (NATO) and £2Billion left for other departments. these figures are not one off payments but continued investment annually.

UK membership payment to the European Union in 2014. £13.Billion - are we really prepared to keep handing over this amount of money to a project we will ultimately leave. because there is absolutely no way the UK will be part of a Federation. and im sure we could use this money here at home to benefit the nation.

To remain in the EU free trade area would cost us £0.8Billion a year in membership as opposed to the £13Billion we pay now as full members for which we receive the square root of F-all in return. We are continually out voted by a majority consensus which is limiting our power. - at least outside of the EU we would be able to negotiate our own trade deals. instead of the watered down EU version we have to accept today as part of the EU. The EU has become the debt Union. and as such demand in the coming years will decline, Britain needs to take advantage of the situation, while the EU is busily handicapping itself in a bid of self-preservation. We should vote to leave the EU and expand our overseas trade with the ability to negotiate our own terms and conditions we can get a great deal for Great Britain.

It was Winston Churchill who said - Great Britain could never be part of such a union because: “we have our own dream and our own task. We are with Europe, but not of it. We are linked, but not comprised. We are interested and associated, but not absorbed.” If Britain must choose between Europe and the open sea, She must always choose the open sea”

Wise words, and its these words we should be following.

Edited April 15, 2015 by stevewinn

[stevewinn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju7RE25LyLg

[Harry_Dresden]

Polish Prince John Zylinski has challenge Ukip leader, Nigel Farage to a sword duel in Hyde park over his comments on immigration - failing that, he has challenged Mr Farage to a "duel of words" on a TV debate.

The prince slammed the Ukip leader's "idiotic" blaming of immigrants for traffic jams on the M40.

http://www.telegraph...n-comments.html

Nigel should thank his lucky stars that its some Pole and not a Arab sheik that's offended by his politics... otherwise poor Nigel would end up looking like a shish kebab.

[Space Commander Travis]

I think Nige seems to have one of the more rational policies regarding Middle Eastern politics; that is, try not to get involved at all. I'm sure there are many, many people in Iraq, Libya, Syria etc who'd be only too keen to show recent and current Prime Ministers just how grateful they are towards them.

[stevewinn]

I think Nige seems to have one of the more rational policies regarding Middle Eastern politics; that is, try not to get involved at all. I'm sure there are many, many people in Iraq, Libya, Syria etc who'd be only too keen to show recent and current Prime Ministers just how grateful they are towards them.

On my travels around the Internet i came across a piece, which i found interesting. a test was done at a University where they put all the different political parties proposals to a test audience. they done this without letting the people know which policies belonged to which party at the end the result was in UKIP came out top by a big margin. Yet when they redone the test but linking the policies to the parties. UKIP came in a poor third place. - It shows how negative publicity and influence can impact upon peoples judgement.

Edited April 18, 2015 by stevewinn