31 replies to this topic

[linttrap]

Someone posted "bent minds" with an unclear reference. I took it as a personal reference. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted who it was directed at.

Nevertheless, my point stands.

If you want to educate people, don't sneer at them. Give them the facts.

[SwampgasBalloonBoy]

seeder, on 02 February 2013 - 08:45 PM, said:

OK its a crap vid! Faked, BS...amateur

why doesn't the cam follow the ufo? Because it wasn't filming ufo's, they were added later. Any donut on earth would follow the filming of a ufo

Want more opinion!  






.

Because it wasn't filming UFOs somehow make it fake is poor reasoning. It was filming the freaking Moon and capture the UFOs accidentally?

I like to advise anyone before making a claim of fake to provide at least some technical aspects of why the video is fake. Then maybe the opinion would actually worth something more than bs.

[Tesla II]

Independance day here we come!

[seeder]

SwampgasBalloonBoy, on 02 February 2013 - 11:05 PM, said:

I like to advise anyone before making a claim of fake to provide at least some technical aspects of why the video is fake

Likewise, kindly provide me with evidence its actually real?  You never know, if..you can do that..I might eat my words. Go ahead please?

[freetoroam]

That video is weird, if you watch carefully at the start of the "original footage" either they forgot to clean the lens or they have something attached on the front of it, it moves with the camera and does not stay still on the moon.

I would very much doubt the "aliens" would go to the moon without paying us a visit from time to time, very rude.

[seeder]

Rafterman, on 02 February 2013 - 07:38 PM, said:

Considering there's nothing on the Earth that could image objects coming and going on the moon in that kind of detail, I think that answers the question.

repost

[SwampgasBalloonBoy]

seeder, on 02 February 2013 - 11:13 PM, said:

Likewise, kindly provide me with evidence its actually real?  You never know, if..you can do that..I might eat my words. Go ahead please?

The claimant needs to provide evidence to back up the claim. Notice I haven't made any claim regarding this particular video. Please go back and read again.

[seeder]

linttrap, on 02 February 2013 - 11:03 PM, said:

Someone posted "bent minds" with an unclear reference. I took it as a personal reference. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted who it was directed at.

Nevertheless, my point stands.

If you want to educate people, don't sneer at them. Give them the facts.

better yet, if you 'really'  want to educate...just point the way...let them discover for themselves

feed a man for a day....or teach him how to fish?

you have to know how to look at both sides

[linttrap]

Did I say I thought it was real? I had no opinion. I was looking for people to give me some facts to judge what I was seeing.

Why do you assume that people believe one way or another, when asking a question?

Sometimes people just want another or several others viewpoint to help them evaluate something.

Facts. Logic.

I have no investment in what I posted, I was curious, that is all.

[Mealtime101]

seeder, on 02 February 2013 - 08:15 PM, said:

I like to advise anyone before posting a vid, to read the comments under the actual video to get a sense of what it is...your posting here!

Just click the title on top left of the vid, thats takes you to YT and scroll down for comments!





.

you ignored the fact that I pointed out that you advised someone even though you clearly said you did no such thing

[linttrap]

Do you not understand the concept of factual response?

THIS is not a factual response:

You said:
I like to advise anyone before posting a vid, to read the comments under the actual video to get a sense of what it is...your posting here!
Just click the title on top left of the vid, thats takes you to YT and scroll down for comments!

What facts did I get from that? Why do you assume I didn't do that already?

THIS is a factual response:
Rafterman said:
Considering there's nothing on the Earth that could image objects coming and going on the moon in that kind of detail, I think that answers the question.

[freetoroam]

Will have to agree with linttrap here, he/she was only asking for opinions or advise. But do not feel disheartened at all Linttrap, this is the reaction you will get with many  youtube videos, because so many are just naff.

[Mealtime101]

freetoroam, on 03 February 2013 - 12:11 AM, said:

Will have to agree with linttrap here, he/she was only asking for opinions or advise. But do not feel disheartened at all Linttrap, this is the reaction you will get with many  youtube videos, because so many are just naff.

I agree with this, you tube is so full of so much crap. I saw the video linttrap posted a while ago and thought it was very cool. Simply saying it is fake proves nothing.

[Realm]

Looks like a few bats, if you look closely you see wings flapping, at least I think so. Probably flying in front of moon, and it looks like they come out of that crater.

[bison]

Granted, the objects would need to have been at least a couple of kilometers across at the distance of the Moon, or extremely bright, or both. I doubt these are bats, as the objects make steady progress along straight lines. Bats, as I know from personal observation, typically dart about, this way and that, very quickly. Large migrating birds, at a substantial distance, are a possibility, though the shapes of the objects don't look even remotely birdlike to me. Could be something of intermediate size at an intermediate distance. Using the same geometric logic, as above, they could have been ~1000 feet in diameter, and ~24,000 miles away, or 100 feet in diameter and 2400 miles distant, or 10 feet across at 240 miles.