Rather poor fake, there are some good points made in the forum about the credibility of the photo. Two men wouldn't beable to carry something weighing 500 to 600 pounds, and the position of the man in the middle is all wrong, his legs are at odd angles. Other comments can be read by clicking on the forum link found on the main page that Al links too.
Edited by Magikman, 16 April 2003 - 12:22 AM.
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. ~ Carl Sagan
"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler
fakes. how the hell are they going to have time to snap a pic of bigfoot with its back to them and one of them pointing at it (as if pointing is necessary)? also, the point was made about how heavy it would be to carry.
i would also add that the 'bigfoot' i saw looked totally different- much more human and had long white hair. that just may be a local variation though.
if there was a meteor,
adrift amongst space,
set about on a collision course
not with Earth, but my face...
i wonder if id even know,
at what time i might,
be passed off like an old style
and by the meteor be smite?
I agree with KC I don't believe the photo's are even of the same creature. The lower part of the Limb in the first photo is roughly the same us the upper part . However in the second photo the lower part of the limb is longer .