Yinarchy Posted March 16, 2016 #1 Share Posted March 16, 2016 The imprisoned splendor that dwells in every human is becoming liberated. The Supreme Being exists at the razor's edge of energy and matter. Light. All things consist of Light, which is neither a particle or a wave, but both. There is no difference between the Light of consciousness, and physical Light consisting of electromagnetic radiation. Light is consciousness itself. Einstein imagined the psycho=active nature of the universe. There is a unifying force, a basic stuff of the cosmos! Everything is consciousness! I am talking about relativity-- E=MC2. Energy equals Mass times the Speed of Light, squared. Albert was looking at it relatively. He didn't put the squared Light in the right place. The C2 belongs in between E and M, reflecting both. The absolute equation should read M=C2=E. Or any combination of the three factors. MCE3, or Mass, Energy and the Speed of Light cubed. Mass and Energy are the same thing, they always have an equal reaction, a mirror-image. The object, process and the speed of Light taken to the third power makes them relevant to each other. Thought travels at the speed of light which is NOW. The only way to understand the self is in relationship to other. It can be mathematically proven: 1 and 1 are 2, which proves a third, or 1 and 1 wouldn't have a relationship. In spiritual terms, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. In philosophy, the experiencer, the experienced and experience, itself. The dreamer and the dream. Energy and Mass are two sides of one whole that includes a third to reunite and reconcile the opposites. Light reflects them both. This formula exercises the Triangle, the (w)holistic symbol for it is the only geometric design where three straight lines-- representing the thesis, the antithesis, and the synthesis, intersect and make a whole. The Now consists of the point where future time intercepts past experience. This is where an energy transfer-- a reflection-- takes place. Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt -- All we are is light made solid. Light is the basis of everything; the first sentence of the Bible: Let there be light. The universe is light. Light is neither a particle or a wave. MC= E Squared. The Big Mc. Light can be either matter or energy... It depends on the reflection... Let me reflect on this! It can be both. mirror-image What does that say about the universe? It's a Youniverse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 16, 2016 #2 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Aren't you being quite dishonest by making something up and using Einstein to promote it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinarchy Posted March 16, 2016 Author #3 Share Posted March 16, 2016 He wouldn't mind, his mind was limitless. He just didn't put Light in the right place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 16, 2016 #4 Share Posted March 16, 2016 (edited) He wouldn't mind, his mind was limitless. He just didn't put Light in the right place You've taken the equation for mass–energy equivalence and turned it into some uneducated gibberish. You can't even prove this new equation.The equation "M=C2=E" doesn't make sense, are you saying the energy and mass are always C (speed of light in a vacuum) squared? So a firecracker has the same energy as a 50-megaton nuke. Edited March 16, 2016 by Rlyeh 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted March 16, 2016 #5 Share Posted March 16, 2016 You've taken the equation for mass–energy equivalence and turned it into some uneducated gibberish. You can't even prove this new equation. The equation "M=C2=E" doesn't make sense, are you saying the energy and mass are always C (speed of light in a vacuum) squared? So a firecracker has the same energy as a 50-megaton nuke. I have a feeling that Yinarchy doesn't understand that C is a constant, while E and M are variables. In any event this is probably just a strange attempt to use science to prove god. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habitat Posted March 16, 2016 #6 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I think I understand this part of the lesson: I got confused after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinarchy Posted March 16, 2016 Author #7 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Light is a constant, while E and M are variables Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 16, 2016 #8 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Light is a constant, while E and M are variables If E and M both equal C2 they can't be variable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinarchy Posted March 16, 2016 Author #9 Share Posted March 16, 2016 It is like Yin/Yang. Yin is the feminine, creative, psychic, spiritual aspect of our individual personalities. Yang is the active male cosmic element. These two primal opposite but complimentary forces, found in all things in the universe, cannot exist without the other, as death cannot exist without life. Yin/Yang: When they reach their extremes they actually become their opposite. Same as energy and matter. Think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonopahRick Posted March 16, 2016 #10 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I think I should go back to bed after this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted March 16, 2016 #11 Share Posted March 16, 2016 It is like Yin/Yang. Yin is the feminine, creative, psychic, spiritual aspect of our individual personalities. Yang is the active male cosmic element. These two primal opposite but complimentary forces, found in all things in the universe, cannot exist without the other, as death cannot exist without life. Yin/Yang: When they reach their extremes they actually become their opposite. Same as energy and matter. Think about it. You're trying to use science to bolster your spiritual / religious beliefs without even bothering to try and understand it first. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted March 16, 2016 #12 Share Posted March 16, 2016 We have hit a new low on stupid threads. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted March 16, 2016 #13 Share Posted March 16, 2016 We have hit a new low on stupid threads. And that low is low indeed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinarchy Posted March 16, 2016 Author #14 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Experiments that went one way for one researcher turn out very differently when another researcher tries it. Science has proved that the observer influences the observed. Consciousness has a physical impact on matter. The famed double-slit experiment shocked physicists when it showed that photons (light particles) act differently when they are observed than when no one is watching.Essentially, the observer can cause the photons to take either the particle or the wave form by the very act of measuring; they aren’t fixed in one form as expected. Particles exist as potential and the observer determines what form they take. He noted that the influence of a researcher’s mind on his or her experiment has serious implications: “If a skeptic wants to replicate what a ‘believer’ found in their experiment, the skeptic can’t do it, because … [it’s going to go the way that guy wants to see it and not the way the other guy wants to see it. Human consciousness influences physical phenomena. Light = Thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 17, 2016 #15 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Particle detectors are conscious then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted March 17, 2016 #16 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Experiments that went one way for one researcher turn out very differently when another researcher tries it. Science has proved that the observer influences the observed. Consciousness has a physical impact on matter. The famed double-slit experiment shocked physicists when it showed that photons (light particles) act differently when they are observed than when no one is watching.Essentially, the observer can cause the photons to take either the particle or the wave form by the very act of measuring; they aren’t fixed in one form as expected. Particles exist as potential and the observer determines what form they take. He noted that the influence of a researcher’s mind on his or her experiment has serious implications: “If a skeptic wants to replicate what a ‘believer’ found in their experiment, the skeptic can’t do it, because … [it’s going to go the way that guy wants to see it and not the way the other guy wants to see it. Human consciousness influences physical phenomena. Light = Thought This thread = a gross misunderstanding of physics 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted March 17, 2016 #17 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Light is a constant, while E and M are variables As Riyeh and others have pointed out - in that hideous word salad of an OP, YOU said that they were all equal. So apart from making no sense whatsoever and using Einstein's name to get people to look, one of those statements is UTTERLY wrong. Hint - it's the one about them all being equal. Which, like the rest of your original post, is just meaningless waffle. But you're right, Einstein wouldn't have minded at all - in the sense he would have turned his back and ignored this complete rubbish. This thread does NOT belong in this section of the forum. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted March 17, 2016 #18 Share Posted March 17, 2016 This thread = a gross misunderstanding of physics This thread = a gross misunderstanding of elementary mathematics. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yinarchy Posted March 17, 2016 Author #19 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Can't prove anything... Can't prove me wrong. The observer and observed are the same is proved by quantum mechanics. See split hole experiment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted March 17, 2016 #20 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Can't prove anything... Can't prove me wrong. The observer and observed are the same is proved by quantum mechanics. See split hole experiment A constant is not equal to two variables. You have been proven wrong. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Posted March 17, 2016 #21 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Can't prove anything... Can't prove me wrong. The observer and observed are the same is proved by quantum mechanics. See split hole experiment The way you perceive different concepts is highly flawed. You really need to be able to explain your thinking mathematically. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted March 17, 2016 #22 Share Posted March 17, 2016 (edited) Human consciousness influences physical phenomena. Nope. This is a complete misreading of the science. And a very common one as well. It simply isn't true. Edited March 17, 2016 by Emma_Acid 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielost Posted March 17, 2016 #23 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I have a feeling that Yinarchy doesn't understand that C is a constant, while E and M are variables. In any event this is probably just a strange attempt to use science to prove god. you can't prove god, because he doesn't want to be proven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted March 17, 2016 #24 Share Posted March 17, 2016 you can't prove god, because he doesn't want to be proven. How convenient. This brings up an interesting question: How do you know what god wants ? In any event this was about the opening post, so what is you opinion on that ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted March 17, 2016 #25 Share Posted March 17, 2016 you can't prove god, because he doesn't want to be proven. No, it's because the idea of god is unfalsifiable. Even your statement is unfalsifiable, so can be completely dismissed scientifically. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now