DONTEATUS Posted June 30, 2012 #1676 Share Posted June 30, 2012 THis seems like a Short Buss thread ! WHat part of Airliners Hitting the Ground,Buildings is hard to understand? THere were no Bomb`s ,No Aliens, No Cruise weapons ! THe bad guys got us that day Planes and simple! WHy dont you all Listen to What Mid`s Saying ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted June 30, 2012 #1677 Share Posted June 30, 2012 I am listening to what he's saying Don, adjust your glasses. I'm listening and commenting, just like you. I'm suggesting that the Zelikow Commission, or whatever one chooses to call it, did not see all the evidence. It was spoonfed evidence. Everybody knows it, and most of the participants talked about it on TV. The art form is in interpretation of evidence, not the exclusion of evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyeagle409 Posted June 30, 2012 #1678 Share Posted June 30, 2012 I am listening to what he's saying Don, adjust your glasses. I'm listening and commenting, just like you. I'm suggesting that the Zelikow Commission, or whatever one chooses to call it, did not see all the evidence. It was spoonfed evidence. Everybody knows it, and most of the participants talked about it on TV. If that is the case, where is your evidence that not all of the evidence was seen or was spoofed? You are making claims that you are not providing evidence for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 1, 2012 #1679 Share Posted July 1, 2012 It is beyond your perception and your comprehension Sky. You deny anything that does not fit in with your view of the OCT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyeagle409 Posted July 1, 2012 #1680 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) It is beyond your perception and your comprehension Sky. You deny anything that does not fit in with your view of the OCT. On the contrary, the fact that you lack evidence has closed the case on your argument and the available evidence has sealed the lid in that respect. Edited July 1, 2012 by skyeagle409 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 1, 2012 #1681 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Only in your tortured mind Sky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyeagle409 Posted July 1, 2012 #1682 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) Only in your tortured mind Sky. How amusing! After all, you've made the claim that a subsonic aircraft cannot penetrate terra firma, not me. Considering that you have failed to provide evidence on other things, underlines my point. Edited July 1, 2012 by skyeagle409 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted July 1, 2012 #1683 Share Posted July 1, 2012 How amusing! After all, you've made the claim that a subsonic aircraft cannot penetrate terra firma, not me. Considering that you have failed to provide evidence on other things, underlines my point. Did he really claim that? I must not have been paying full attention... However, I wonder how he'd explain the 3 foot deep and 8 foot wide crater in the tarmac that a P-51 mustang made when it crashed at the Reno Air Race last year... Certainly, a P-51 isn't super-sonic. "Bad fast", but not super-sonic, and it left a big hole in terra firma...through the tarmac! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyeagle409 Posted July 1, 2012 #1684 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Did he really claim that? Yes! Check it out. If you were under 15 on 9/11 click here Post 941 Wrecked Boeings are not rendered invisible, and they cannot bury themselves in the ground. In a crash, the energy is absorbed by the airframe and structure. Baggage and bodies are relatively protected are do not become invisible. Aluminum airframes cannot dig holes and then bury themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted July 1, 2012 #1685 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Yes! Check it out. wHEW! ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Jones Posted July 2, 2012 #1686 Share Posted July 2, 2012 It would be easy to get 300 people to swear on their mothers graves that they saw Bruce Wayne drive the batmobile into the Pentagon. Witnessess make no difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted July 2, 2012 #1687 Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) It would be easy to get 300 people to swear on their mothers graves that they saw Bruce Wayne drive the batmobile into the Pentagon. Witnessess make no difference. Welcome to UM Nathan. Out of curiosity, which side of the 911 fence do you sit on? (edit: never mind the question, the side you sit on is clear...) Edited July 2, 2012 by booNyzarC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Jones Posted July 2, 2012 #1688 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Welcome to UM Nathan. Out of curiosity, which side of the 911 fence do you sit on? I think it was an inside job because there's no proof that the government didn't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted July 2, 2012 #1689 Share Posted July 2, 2012 I think it was an inside job because there's no proof that the government didn't do it. Well with that kind of logic you should also think that I robbed the corner store because there's no proof that I didn't do it. Yep, another stellar truther performance in the waiting. You'll fit in just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lliqerty Posted July 2, 2012 #1690 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Well with that kind of logic you should also think that I robbed the corner store because there's no proof that I didn't do it. Yep, another stellar truther performance in the waiting. You'll fit in just fine. LOGOS THAT KEEP ON MOVING ARE HIGHLY DISTRACTIVE. THEY ARE, LIKE SCREAMING, VERY RUDE. YOU ARE THE PERFECT PROOF FOR THE TRUTH OF YOUR OWN ADAMS QUOTE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted July 2, 2012 #1691 Share Posted July 2, 2012 LOGOS THAT KEEP ON MOVING ARE HIGHLY DISTRACTIVE. THEY ARE, LIKE SCREAMING, VERY RUDE. YOU ARE THE PERFECT PROOF FOR THE TRUTH OF YOUR OWN ADAMS QUOTE. http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=196596&st=330#entry4349328 ROFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted July 4, 2012 #1692 Share Posted July 4, 2012 (edited) Well with that kind of logic you should also think that I robbed the corner store because there's no proof that I didn't do it. Yep, another stellar truther performance in the waiting. You'll fit in just fine. And as you can see BooNy, it only took that one two days...gone! Edited July 4, 2012 by MID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booNyzarC Posted July 4, 2012 #1693 Share Posted July 4, 2012 And as you can see BooNy, it only took that one two days...gone! Yes, though it seemed like a lot longer than that for some reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted July 4, 2012 #1694 Share Posted July 4, 2012 Yes, though it seemed like a lot longer than that for some reason... Perobably the nearly 80 trolling posts per day he accomplished. Amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lliqerty Posted July 5, 2012 #1695 Share Posted July 5, 2012 You may find this useful, a list of hundreds of eye witness reports http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 5, 2012 #1696 Share Posted July 5, 2012 We can trust only the government statements. The statements of ordinary citizens are suspect, and if they contradict the Official Conspiracy Theory, they are flat out wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyeagle409 Posted July 5, 2012 #1697 Share Posted July 5, 2012 (edited) We can trust only the government statements. The statements of ordinary citizens are suspect, and if they contradict the Official Conspiracy Theory, they are flat out wrong. It is what the evidence depicts. You have 9/11 CT folks claiming that no aircraft crashed at Shanksville nor at the Pentagon despite non-government eyewitnesses accounts of recovered aircraft wreckage and remains of human bodies from those crash sites at which point other 9/11 CT folks claimed that United 93 was shot down despite the fact that pilots had orders to conduct a CAP over Washington D.C., not over Shanksville. Edited July 5, 2012 by skyeagle409 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted July 6, 2012 #1698 Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) I think it was an inside job because there's no proof that the government didn't do it. Unfortunately, Nathan, there's no possibility of you ever satisfying your actual burden of proof in this matter. Good luck! Edited July 6, 2012 by MID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted October 14, 2012 #1699 Share Posted October 14, 2012 (edited) Unfortunately, Nathan, there's no possibility of you ever satisfying your actual burden of proof in this matter. Good luck! It apparently, I was right... That proving the government did it thing must've been too much.... It's OK, no one else has ever come close to proving that. Edited October 14, 2012 by MID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted October 15, 2012 #1700 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Nobody I'm aware of can prove the Official Conspiracy Theory. They can't even prove the airplanes were hijacked by the named critters, and they cannot prove that 77 crashed at the Pentagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now