For example; you stated that the wholly undocumented "species" under discussion is (purportedly) "far more savvy than given credit" (LDJ #325). Could one then presume that you have at hand the credible documentation to support this statement? If so, providing said documentation would be an asset to your own credibility and the viability of your position.
I'm sorry Swede.. I didn't get the memo that said the existence of Bigfoot relied solely on passing your subjective analysis.. while I generally enjoy a friendly joust and often encourage it, I am thinking that in this case it would just end up petty and less than satisfactory for both of us.. best wishes..