Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#1306    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:44 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:37 PM, said:

Sorry but the people at GZ do not refer to it as compressed air...

Apparently, you haven't been paying attention nor reading the reports of compressed air and look what you have posted. You are not paying attention at all.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1307    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:49 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:44 PM, said:

Apparently, you haven't been paying attention nor reading the reports of compressed air and look what you have posted. You are not paying attention at all.
Apparently you think you know better than those at GZ again. :rolleyes:

Firefighter Schroeder made it all the way up to the 23rd floor before barely hearing on the failing radios that another plane was coming in. That plane would hit the South Tower though for some reason “We were tossed like a rag doll by another explosion in our building. People were making there way down the stairwells burnt like you couldn’t believe. We were all shocked because it seemed as if there was fire everywhere, on so many floors. It just didn’t make sense”.

So according to Skyeagle logic, compressed air burns people and set fires of everywhere does it :blink:....lol

So the explosions are now elevators falling, manhole explosions and now compressed air, but definitely not explosives?? lol

Such great pantomime debunking....ol

Edited by Stundie, 27 March 2013 - 04:50 PM.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1308    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:49 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:37 PM, said:

Sorry but the people at GZ do not refer to it as compressed air..

You might want to read this report.


What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York

http://www.civil.nor...ot Cause It.pdf

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1309    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:50 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:49 PM, said:

You might want to read this report.


What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York

http://www.civil.nor...ot Cause It.pdf
I've read it but it's flawed, just like your logic....lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1310    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:52 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:49 PM, said:

Apparently you think you know better than those at GZ again.


If you want to bring people who were at ground zero into the debate, lets add the demolition experts, structural, civil engineers and investigators who were at ground zero have stated they found no evidence of explosives.

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:50 PM, said:

I've read it but it's flawed, just like your logic....lol

You didn't read it at all because I just posted it!! :lol: So once again, I caught you trying to mislead the readers. Now, go back and read it.

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 04:53 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1311    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:55 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:51 PM, said:

If you want to bring people who were at ground zero into the debate, lets add the demolition experts, structural, civil engineers and investigators who were at ground zero have stated they found no evidence of explosives.
Sorry I didn't realise that bringing evidence from people who were at GZ into the debate to prove that it was not compressed air was against the rules...lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1312    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 04:58 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:55 PM, said:

Sorry I didn't realise that bringing evidence from people who were at GZ into the debate to prove that it was not compressed air was against the rules...lol

Apparently, you are not up-to-speed as to what has been reported, or are you just trying to mislead the readers again?

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1313    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:06 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 04:55 PM, said:

Sorry I didn't realise that bringing evidence from people who were at GZ into the debate to prove that it was not compressed air was against the rules...lol

Let's take a look.


Puffs Of Dust

Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report.

Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air—along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse—was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."

Read more: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center - Popular Mechanics

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 05:09 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1314    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:10 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 04:58 PM, said:

Apparently, you are not up-to-speed as to what has been reported, or are you just trying to mislead the readers again?
Sorry was compressed air reported by the eyewitnesses at GZ?

And does compress air burn people and set fire to everywhere?? lol

The only person try to mislead readers is you, by avoiding question like the ones above. All it does is highlight that you haven't got a god damn clue and exposes the lies your sprout from behind your keyboard while claiming to know better than those at GZ.

The problem is that you are fooling absolutely no one but yourself. lol

Keep up the pantomime....lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1315    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:18 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:

Sorry was compressed air reported by the eyewitnesses at GZ?


Let's take another look, because I have posted this before, which once again, proves that you are trying to mislead the readers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We heard the explosion and within a matter of seconds after that impact, I heard – and as well as everybody else heard – this noise, this increasing sound of wind. And it was getting louder and louder. It was like a bomb, not quite the sound of a bomb coming down from a bomber. It was a sound of wind increasing, a whistling sound, increasing in sound.

I’m looking from the lobby up to a mezzanine area or the second floor where they lined up all the people to go up to the rooftop, and I’m looking up expecting something, building parts to be coming down, because I wasn’t quite sure what that noise was.

But I found out later, when the plane came through the building, it cut the hoist ropes, the governor ropes, of (the) 6 and 7 cars, which was the observation cars.

What we heard was 6 and 7 car free-falling from the 107th floor and they impacted the basement at B-2 Level. And that’s the explosion that filled the lobby within a matter of two or three seconds, engulfed the lobby in dust, smoke.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, what was that  you were saying?? You just got caught again conducting another deception attempt.

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 05:19 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1316    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:20 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:06 PM, said:

Let's take a look.


Puffs Of Dust

Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report.

Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air—along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse—was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years."

Read more: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center - Popular Mechanics

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is same popular mechanics who says that structures can't be demolished by thermite, even though they had reported structures being demolished by thermite many years before...lol

Is this the same popular mechanics that is owned by yellow journalism outfit Hearst?? lol

is this same popular popular mechanics that got owned by AZ Radio host Charles Goyette back in 2006? lol

Sorry but until they explain how and why this compressed air/ puffs of smoke travel up and down the building as it collapses and some of them before it collapses, then you might as well post a picture of a turd as evidence.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1317    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:27 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 05:20 PM, said:

This is same popular mechanics who says that structures can't be demolished by thermite,...

Which thermite cannot do. Ever wondered why thermite is not widely used by the demolition industry for the implosion of buildings?

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1318    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:47 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

Which thermite cannot do.
Oh but it can, it's been shown to bring down 600ft steel structures and Jon Cole showed you it cutting a steel beam.

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

Ever wondered why thermite is not widely used by the demolition industry for the implosion of buildings?
Cause explosives are better.

Ever wondered why fires are not widely used the by the demolition industry for the implosion of buildings even though by your own logic, they appear to be very good at bringing down buildings, especially toy factories and overpasses.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#1319    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,711 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 March 2013 - 05:49 PM

View PostStundie, on 27 March 2013 - 05:47 PM, said:

Oh but it can,...

Thermite can't, which is why demolition companies do not use thermite for demolition implosions of buildings. Even RDX, which is much more effective than thermite, requires help in demolishing a building by structural pre-weakening the buildings and the use of dynamite, or other explosives and remember, thermite is not an explosive.

Edited by skyeagle409, 27 March 2013 - 06:02 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1320    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 27 March 2013 - 06:07 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 March 2013 - 05:49 PM, said:

Thermite can't, which is why demolition companies do not use thermite for demolition implosions.
They don't use it because explosives are more effective. Doesn't mean they couldn't use it as it was used back in 1935 to bring down 2 600ft structures.

Ever wondered why they don't use fires though? Lets look at benefits for fires over explosives....
  • Saves time as there is no need to empty building contents and leaving them makes the fires more effective.
  • Save time on pre-weakening as with fires, there is no need to pre-weaken as it will do the job itself.
  • No need to spend time rigging the building with explosive
  • No need for wiring the building with explosives
  • No need for planning or setting detonation timings.
  • Cost effective as it save demolition crews all that time.
  • A storey building can be demolished in around 7 hours, all in a days work.
  • Leaves the debris in a nice neat pile, just like it was done with explosives.
  • Can be started with a match.
Makes you wonder why the demolition industry spends all the weeks and months when a fire will suffice....lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.