Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

The Wedding of Jesus


  • Please log in to reply
208 replies to this topic

#1    Ben Masada

Ben Masada

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,986 posts
  • Joined:06 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:30 PM

THE WEDDING OF JESUS

Now, please, hold on unto the stones, and no throwing at least until you hear what I have to say. Besides, that's not my final word. I am still researching the matter. I am partially submitting this topic for some second thoughts to make sure it remains no doubt in my mind.

Jesus was a Rabbi and here are the proofs: Matthew 23:7; Luke 7:37-39; John 1:38; 3:2; 20:16. In many other instances he was addressed as Master which means the same. The point is that a Rabbi in Israel, then and today, had to be a married man or about to get married. Otherwise, he could not be "ordained" as such. According to Judaism, after the proper procedure, the Jewish prospect would undergo the ceremonial "mikveh" or immersion in waters and, if not married yet, to take care of that before "ordination."

After Jesus' immersion in the Jordan River by Yonathan the Immerser, Jesus was seen during the next two days recruiting his disciples and on his way to Galilee. (John 1:35,43) Then on the third day after his mikveh, the family and friends were celebrating his wedding in Cana with Mary Magdalene. Wait! Put down the stones! I'll explain. First of all, and according to the custom, usually the mother of the Bride would be in charge of the celebrations, but probably Mary's parents had passed away because she used to live with her sister Martha and brother Lazarus in Bethany. I mean, they used to live with Mary who was the one well-to-do. Martha would pay her room-and-board as a maiden servant, and Lazarus... well, I think he was a loafer boy taking advantage of his rich sister. He was probably a sick man anyway.

Okay, but back to the wedding, Jesus' mother Mary had to do the host job; and she did it quite well, by giving orders around to the servants. Also, according to the custom, the  Bridegroom was in charge to provide the guests, especially with the wine, which Jesus, mind you, made sure it was of the best quality. The tale of the miracle was interpolated much later to deviate the probing attention of those who have a mind of their own from finding out what was really going on in Canah.

After Jesus' wedding, you can check for yourselves, all Jesus' come-and-goes were from and to Bethany, the home of Mary Magdalene. It must have been a very spacious and beautiful home since Mary had the means to maintain it. Mind you that she would also take the tab for the expenses of Jesus' group of the Twelve, along with some other women of course who would pitch in from time to time. (Luke 8:2,3)

Whenever Jesus would return from his missionary campains throughout Israel, the address was Bethany. To his wife obviously, although most the time Mary Magdalene would follow Jesus as his beloved disciple; but never like one of the Twelve. The Church later interpolated John as the "beloved disciple" for the same reason to get the mind of the readers away from the thought that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. But it's not helping because the evidences are just too shouting.

Do we have any hint to pick up as evidence for any romantic approach prior or after their wedding? Of course, we do! After Jesus exorcized seven demons from Mary she must have fallen in love with him.(Luke 8:1-3) The expression seven demons means only the struggle Jesus had to go through to extricate Mary from her not-so-reputable business in Magdala. Then, in Bethany - where else? - when Mary was smearing Jesus' body with that expensive pefume, we all know, although we forbid ourselves to think about, that Mary did not just throw that perfume at him from afar. Definitely not! she did smear him almost all over even in terms of massage, so much so that some of the guests thought it to be unbecoming. (Mat. 26:10-13; Luke 7:37-39)

Then, while everyone else would address Jesus as Rabbi, even his friend Nicodemus, (John 3:1,2) Mary would call him "Rabboni," a colloquial term used as an expression of love, especially by a Rabbi's wife. It also means "Master of my suffering," as Rachel named her son Benoni before she died from child birth. (Gen. 35:18) Jesus was the master of Mary's predicament to change her life style. In another occasion, when Mary went to the tomb area after the crucifixion, and saw the empty tomb, she never suffered more in her life. She wanted to take him away with her. (John 20:15) Then, she was crying without consolation. In the middle of her travails, she saw a man standing by and took him for the Gardener. "Why are you crying?" the man asked. Of course, Jesus knew why, but he wanted to enjoy the answer from his beloved's own lips. Alas! She did not identify him; it was too dark. But then Jesus tried her name the way he used to call her: "Mary...!" It's hard to say it in writing, but Mary melted all down and exclaimed" "Raboni!"

This term "Raboni", or Master of my sufferings, is such a solemn and love-tender expression in Hebrew and Aramaic that only seldom it is used out of the frame of deep love. It was then that she jumped to hug him but Jesus, probably all in bandages, forbade her to cause him any unnecessary pain. He would meet her later at more propitious circumstances. (John 20:17) Then, after some apparitions to the disciples, Jesus said goodbye and left his company. From then on, the names of these three peoples were never mentioned again; Jesus, Mary Magdalene and Joseph of Arimathea. Jesus yes, but only in connection with his teachings by the Nazarenes, a Jewish Sect organized by his Apostles. Joseph had to go along because if he had stayed, he would probably be crucified for having cheated on Pilate regarding Jesus who was not dead when he was taken off the cross.

Today, there are three speculations about their whereabouts. The first is that they settled down incognito in Talpiot, a small town not too far south of Jerusalem, where some people have claimed to have found out the graves of Yeshua, Miriam and Joseph. I went there personally but just to be told that the area could not be explored or visited by order of the local Meier for being under an Apartment building. The second speculation is that they left Israel in the direction of Cashmere, India, where a Russian Archaeologist had found the graves of Yeshua, Miriam and Joseph under the sign of the shield of David.  And the third speculation is the one of the Da Vinci Code, that the three went to Europe and settled down in the Southern part of France in a small village. And that Mary gave birth to a daughter, who eventually got married into the Merovingian nobility.

Whatever happened after Jesus said goodbye to his disciples, I don't endorse anything that has been speculated. My point is only to verify the truth about Jesus' marriage to Mary Magdalene. If that's true without the shadow of a doubt, we have only to be joyful that Jesus fulfilled also the commandment to get married and father children. Besides, a married man only adds to his honour for being so. Why deny Jesus the pleasure of being a man by experiencing the love of a woman? Obvious, don't you think so?

Okay, now you can throw the stones. Nu! I am ready! Hello! Where is everybody? Hellooo! Well, I guess they all left. They must have got the idea that they all have feelings too.

Ben


#2    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,518 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:40 PM

I think I have just had Deja vu!

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#3    Ben Masada

Ben Masada

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,986 posts
  • Joined:06 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:12 PM

View Postfreetoroam, on 23 April 2013 - 08:40 PM, said:

I think I have just had Deja vu!

Try harder and share with us what you have been reminded of.


#4    docyabut2

docyabut2

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,656 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:35 PM

Ben, when Joesph  died Jesus was the head of the family as the oldest son, the wedding at canon may have been one of his sisters, as why to he supplied the wine. Also in the tomb of Talpiot there a ossusrie Judan son of Jesus ,Judan was the youngest in the family after the sisters and Jesus may have taken the role of a father to him.



http://en.wikipedia....t_Tomb_of_Jesus

Edited by docyabut2, 23 April 2013 - 09:38 PM.


#5    fullywired

fullywired

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,116 posts
  • Joined:16 Apr 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:09 PM

View PostBen Masada, on 23 April 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:

THE WEDDING OF JESUS

Now, please, hold on unto the stones, and no throwing at least until you hear what I have to say. Besides, that's not my final word. I am still researching the matter. I am partially submitting this topic for some second thoughts to make sure it remains no doubt in my mind.

Jesus was a Rabbi and here are the proofs: Matthew 23:7; Luke 7:37-39; John 1:38; 3:2; 20:16. In many other instances he was addressed as Master which means the same. The point is that a Rabbi in Israel, then and today, had to be a married man or about to get married. Otherwise, he could not be "ordained" as such. According to Judaism, after the proper procedure, the Jewish prospect would undergo the ceremonial "mikveh" or immersion in waters and, if not married yet, to take care of that before "ordination."

After Jesus' immersion in the Jordan River by Yonathan the Immerser, Jesus was seen during the next two days recruiting his disciples and on his way to Galilee. (John 1:35,43) Then on the third day after his mikveh, the family and friends were celebrating his wedding in Cana with Mary Magdalene. Wait! Put down the stones! I'll explain. First of all, and according to the custom, usually the mother of the Bride would be in charge of the celebrations, but probably Mary's parents had passed away because she used to live with her sister Martha and brother Lazarus in Bethany. I mean, they used to live with Mary who was the one well-to-do. Martha would pay her room-and-board as a maiden servant, and Lazarus... well, I think he was a loafer boy taking advantage of his rich sister. He was probably a sick man anyway.

Okay, but back to the wedding, Jesus' mother Mary had to do the host job; and she did it quite well, by giving orders around to the servants. Also, according to the custom, the  Bridegroom was in charge to provide the guests, especially with the wine, which Jesus, mind you, made sure it was of the best quality. The tale of the miracle was interpolated much later to deviate the probing attention of those who have a mind of their own from finding out what was really going on in Canah.

After Jesus' wedding, you can check for yourselves, all Jesus' come-and-goes were from and to Bethany, the home of Mary Magdalene. It must have been a very spacious and beautiful home since Mary had the means to maintain it. Mind you that she would also take the tab for the expenses of Jesus' group of the Twelve, along with some other women of course who would pitch in from time to time. (Luke 8:2,3)

Whenever Jesus would return from his missionary campains throughout Israel, the address was Bethany. To his wife obviously, although most the time Mary Magdalene would follow Jesus as his beloved disciple; but never like one of the Twelve. The Church later interpolated John as the "beloved disciple" for the same reason to get the mind of the readers away from the thought that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. But it's not helping because the evidences are just too shouting.

Do we have any hint to pick up as evidence for any romantic approach prior or after their wedding? Of course, we do! After Jesus exorcized seven demons from Mary she must have fallen in love with him.(Luke 8:1-3) The expression seven demons means only the struggle Jesus had to go through to extricate Mary from her not-so-reputable business in Magdala. Then, in Bethany - where else? - when Mary was smearing Jesus' body with that expensive pefume, we all know, although we forbid ourselves to think about, that Mary did not just throw that perfume at him from afar. Definitely not! she did smear him almost all over even in terms of massage, so much so that some of the guests thought it to be unbecoming. (Mat. 26:10-13; Luke 7:37-39)

Then, while everyone else would address Jesus as Rabbi, even his friend Nicodemus, (John 3:1,2) Mary would call him "Rabboni," a colloquial term used as an expression of love, especially by a Rabbi's wife. It also means "Master of my suffering," as Rachel named her son Benoni before she died from child birth. (Gen. 35:18) Jesus was the master of Mary's predicament to change her life style. In another occasion, when Mary went to the tomb area after the crucifixion, and saw the empty tomb, she never suffered more in her life. She wanted to take him away with her. (John 20:15) Then, she was crying without consolation. In the middle of her travails, she saw a man standing by and took him for the Gardener. "Why are you crying?" the man asked. Of course, Jesus knew why, but he wanted to enjoy the answer from his beloved's own lips. Alas! She did not identify him; it was too dark. But then Jesus tried her name the way he used to call her: "Mary...!" It's hard to say it in writing, but Mary melted all down and exclaimed" "Raboni!"

This term "Raboni", or Master of my sufferings, is such a solemn and love-tender expression in Hebrew and Aramaic that only seldom it is used out of the frame of deep love. It was then that she jumped to hug him but Jesus, probably all in bandages, forbade her to cause him any unnecessary pain. He would meet her later at more propitious circumstances. (John 20:17) Then, after some apparitions to the disciples, Jesus said goodbye and left his company. From then on, the names of these three peoples were never mentioned again; Jesus, Mary Magdalene and Joseph of Arimathea. Jesus yes, but only in connection with his teachings by the Nazarenes, a Jewish Sect organized by his Apostles. Joseph had to go along because if he had stayed, he would probably be crucified for having cheated on Pilate regarding Jesus who was not dead when he was taken off the cross.

Today, there are three speculations about their whereabouts. The first is that they settled down incognito in Talpiot, a small town not too far south of Jerusalem, where some people have claimed to have found out the graves of Yeshua, Miriam and Joseph. I went there personally but just to be told that the area could not be explored or visited by order of the local Meier for being under an Apartment building. The second speculation is that they left Israel in the direction of Cashmere, India, where a Russian Archaeologist had found the graves of Yeshua, Miriam and Joseph under the sign of the shield of David.  And the third speculation is the one of the Da Vinci Code, that the three went to Europe and settled down in the Southern part of France in a small village. And that Mary gave birth to a daughter, who eventually got married into the Merovingian nobility.

Whatever happened after Jesus said goodbye to his disciples, I don't endorse anything that has been speculated. My point is only to verify the truth about Jesus' marriage to Mary Magdalene. If that's true without the shadow of a doubt, we have only to be joyful that Jesus fulfilled also the commandment to get married and father children. Besides, a married man only adds to his honour for being so. Why deny Jesus the pleasure of being a man by experiencing the love of a woman? Obvious, don't you think so?

Okay, now you can throw the stones. Nu! I am ready! Hello! Where is everybody? Hellooo! Well, I guess they all left. They must have got the idea that they all have feelings too.

Ben

What's that old saying " never let the truth get in the way of a good story "

    fullywired

Posted Image  



"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
-------Buddha (563 - 483 BC)

#6    IamsSon

IamsSon

    Unobservable Matter

  • Member
  • 11,870 posts
  • Joined:01 Jul 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

  • ďIf you canít explain it simply, you donít understand it well enough.Ē ~ Albert Einstein

Posted 24 April 2013 - 03:20 PM

View Postfullywired, on 24 April 2013 - 03:09 PM, said:

What's that old saying " never let the truth get in the way of a good story "

fullywired

... and if there's a few things you can throw in to make the story better, go ahead and do so.

Edited by IamsSon, 24 April 2013 - 03:21 PM.

"But then with me that horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?" - Charles Darwin, in a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881

#7    fullywired

fullywired

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,116 posts
  • Joined:16 Apr 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 24 April 2013 - 06:43 PM

View PostIamsSon, on 24 April 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:

... and if there's a few things you can throw in to make the story better, go ahead and do so.
No., there are those on here with much more fertile imaginations than I,   who will no doubt oblige you  .Whilst I will content myself by  sitting at the feet of the master

fullywired

Posted Image  



"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
-------Buddha (563 - 483 BC)

#8    Ben Masada

Ben Masada

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,986 posts
  • Joined:06 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel

Posted 24 April 2013 - 08:41 PM

View Postdocyabut2, on 23 April 2013 - 09:35 PM, said:

Ben, when Joesph  died Jesus was the head of the family as the oldest son, the wedding at canon may have been one of his sisters, as why to he supplied the wine. Also in the tomb of Talpiot there a ossusrie Judan son of Jesus ,Judan was the youngest in the family after the sisters and Jesus may have taken the role of a father to him.

http://en.wikipedia....t_Tomb_of_Jesus

Well, hypothetically every thing is possible but why all that, just to safeguard him from having been a married man? There are more contradictions to deal with if Jesus was a single man than if he was married.

Ben


#9    StarMountainKid

StarMountainKid

    Cheese

  • Member
  • 4,121 posts
  • Joined:17 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Star Mountain, Corporate States of America

  • We have problems because we stray from what is innocent and pure.

Posted 25 April 2013 - 01:36 AM

I'm not an expert in these matters, but why not the OP's conjecture? I think Jesus as a married man would not be compatible with the idea of Jesus as Messiah, so his marriage would have been suppressed.

The acceptance of authority does not lead to intelligence.
A mind untouched by thought...the end of knowledge.
My credentials: http://www.unexplain...ic=87935&st=225

#10    White Crane Feather

White Crane Feather

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,512 posts
  • Joined:12 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Potter: " is this real or is this in my mind?"

    Dumbledore: " Of course it's in your mind....., but that dosn't mean it's not real."

Posted 25 April 2013 - 04:42 AM

There seems to be more circumstantial evidence that he was maried than him being resurected. It's much more plausible to say the least.

"I wish neither to possess, Nor to be possessed. I no longer covet paradise, more important, I no longer fear hell. The medicine for my suffering I had within me from the very beginning, but I did not take it. My ailment came from within myself, But I did not observe it until this moment. Now I see that I will never find the light.  Unless, like the candle, I am my own fuel, Consuming myself. "
Bruce Lee-

#11    MasterFlint

MasterFlint

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 83 posts
  • Joined:17 Apr 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NC

Posted 25 April 2013 - 04:46 AM

View PostBen Masada, on 23 April 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:


Jesus was a Rabbi and here are the proofs: Matthew 23:7; Luke 7:37-39; John 1:38; 3:2; 20:16.


After Jesus' wedding, you can check for yourselves, all Jesus' come-and-goes were from and to Bethany, the home of Mary Magdalene. It must have been a very spacious and beautiful home since Mary had the means to maintain it. Mind you that she would also take the tab for the expenses of Jesus' group of the Twelve, along with some other women of course who would pitch in from time to time. (Luke 8:2,3)


Do we have any hint to pick up as evidence for any romantic approach prior or after their wedding? Of course, we do! After Jesus exorcized seven demons from Mary she must have fallen in love with him.(Luke 8:1-3) The expression seven demons means only the struggle Jesus had to go through to extricate Mary from her not-so-reputable business in Magdala. Then, in Bethany - where else? - when Mary was smearing Jesus' body with that expensive pefume, we all know, although we forbid ourselves to think about, that Mary did not just throw that perfume at him from afar. Definitely not! she did smear him almost all over even in terms of massage, so much so that some of the guests thought it to be unbecoming. (Mat. 26:10-13; Luke 7:37-39)

Then, while everyone else would address Jesus as Rabbi, even his friend Nicodemus, (John 3:1,2) Mary would call him "Rabboni," a colloquial term used as an expression of love, especially by a Rabbi's wife. It also means "Master of my suffering," as Rachel named her son Benoni before she died from child birth. (Gen. 35:18) Jesus was the master of Mary's predicament to change her life style. In another occasion, when Mary went to the tomb area after the crucifixion, and saw the empty tomb, she never suffered more in her life. She wanted to take him away with her. (John 20:15) Then, she was crying without consolation. In the middle of her travails, she saw a man standing by and took him for the Gardener. "Why are you crying?" the man asked. Of course, Jesus knew why, but he wanted to enjoy the answer from his beloved's own lips. Alas! She did not identify him; it was too dark. But then Jesus tried her name the way he used to call her: "Mary...!" It's hard to say it in writing, but Mary melted all down and exclaimed" "Raboni!"

This term "Raboni", or Master of my sufferings, is such a solemn and love-tender expression in Hebrew and Aramaic that only seldom it is used out of the frame of deep love. It was then that she jumped to hug him but Jesus, probably all in bandages, forbade her to cause him any unnecessary pain. He would meet her later at more propitious circumstances. (John 20:17) Then, after some apparitions to the disciples, Jesus said goodbye and left his company. From then on, the names of these three peoples were never mentioned again; Jesus, Mary Magdalene and Joseph of Arimathea. Jesus yes, but only in connection with his teachings by the Nazarenes, a Jewish Sect organized by his Apostles. Joseph had to go along because if he had stayed, he would probably be crucified for having cheated on Pilate regarding Jesus who was not dead when he was taken off the cross.

Ben

Goodness gracious...  where to start?  lol.

First off there's no scriptural evidence that Jesus was an ordained Rabbi.  What is more likely and can be inferred from the scriptures is that because Jesus taught the Word of God and did so while performing miracles and teaching it from a position of authority, all those who believed on him called him Rabbi or Master out of respect.  Those who believed on him were already believing him to be the prophesied Messiah and heir to the Throne of David.  Therefore it is for those reasons that he was called Rabbi, not because of him ever being ordained...

First off, in Math 23:7 Jesus is talking about OTHERS liking to be called Rabbi because of the prestige that comes with it, HE'S NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT HIMSELF OR IS ANYONE ELSE CALLING HIM RABBI!!  Further on in that chapter he says that you have only ONE MASTER, even Christ!  And we all know that He IS Christ, therefore he's giving you the reason right there as to why He is called Rabbi......because He is the prophesized Christ, He is Rabbi by his very nature, NOT because he was ordained, as Christ, he was ordained by GOD!

In Luke 7:37-39  Simon ( the phairasee that invited Jesus into is house) calls Jesus Master after people were upset he let a sinner touch him and Jesus begins to tell him a parable to justify what's happening....once again, as it states in verse 39: 36 And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.  This Pharisee was different from the others there, he perceived Jesus was Teaching the True Word of God and he desired him to eat with him, it is out of respect and belief that Jesus's words are true that Jesus is called Master, not because he was an ordained Rabbi....  You will never see any of Jesus's enemies call him Rabbi to the best of my knowledge, and that's because only his followers and believers called him Rabbi or Master.

John 1:38  again, Jesus isn't called Master here because of any formal ordination, he was called Master because the disciples heard John The Baptist call Jesus The Lamb of God!  Since they overheard this from John The Baptist they believed Jesus was a Master and Teacher.
35 Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;
36 And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!
37 And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.
38 Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?

I will rest my case on the reason Jesus was called Rabbi,Rabboni, Master, ect was because his followers simply believed on Him and His Teachings as coming from God and not because he was an ordained Rabbi with this (which you attempted to use to argue the opposite) :  John 3: 1-2:
1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.


You have not quoted any scripture that backs up your claim that Jesus kept going to Bethany and staying at Mary Magdalen's house, nor is there any truth to Mary Magdalene being the sister of Martha or lazarus...  There is also nothing that says Mary Magdalene was the one who anointed Jesus's head with oil, and also your lieing about it being some sort of sexual massage act and the others there being upset by it, the scripture states they were upset that the whole box of oil was used for the anointing because it could have been sold to make money to give to the poor...
Mathew Chp 26:
6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper,
7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.
8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?
9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.
10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.
11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.

Not only do these verses show the real reason they were angry, but also show Jesus in Bethany in Simon the leper's house, not Mary's as you have made up...

Lastly, Rabboni was just another way of saying Master as it states in the scripture.  Also Jesus did die on the cross and rose again on the third day from the dead.  All I can really say about your ridiculas topic post and attempt to use scripture to back up your Ludacris claims.....is that satan tries to use scripture to his advantage too, but just like how Jesus shut him up by using it the correct way, you and your crazy stories have also been shut up by the actual scriptures...


#12    Jor-el

Jor-el

    Knight of the Most High God

  • Member
  • 7,812 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal

  • We are the sum of all that is, and has been. We will be the sum of our choices.

Posted 27 April 2013 - 08:47 AM

View PostBen Masada, on 23 April 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:

THE WEDDING OF JESUS

Now, please, hold on unto the stones, and no throwing at least until you hear what I have to say. Besides, that's not my final word. I am still researching the matter. I am partially submitting this topic for some second thoughts to make sure it remains no doubt in my mind.

Jesus was a Rabbi and here are the proofs: Matthew 23:7; Luke 7:37-39; John 1:38; 3:2; 20:16. In many other instances he was addressed as Master which means the same. The point is that a Rabbi in Israel, then and today, had to be a married man or about to get married. Otherwise, he could not be "ordained" as such. According to Judaism, after the proper procedure, the Jewish prospect would undergo the ceremonial "mikveh" or immersion in waters and, if not married yet, to take care of that before "ordination."

......

Okay, now you can throw the stones. Nu! I am ready! Hello! Where is everybody? Hellooo! Well, I guess they all left. They must have got the idea that they all have feelings too.

Ben

Just a small question but not inconsequential if you think about it...

How many prophets totally accepted by the Jews and whose books are part of the Tanakh were actually married?

Even further, John the Baptist, highly respected by the Jews even if not part of the Tanakh since he wrote no book, was he married?

The mistake you make is in thinking that Rabbi is a title. It is but it is not a formal title, it merely means teacher. In later centuries, it did become a formal title with a specific ordination, just as a priest.

There is no evidence that a teacher of the Law, just as aprophet of the law, had to be married. That it became accepted practice in later centuries is not in doubt, but it was not so at the time of Jesus.

It was certainly very common, but I can't find a requirement in the talmud, and I find two talmudic examples to indicate that such as not neccessary.

Sotah 4b says that Ben Azzai was unmarried and we know that he was called a Rabbi, although the title was never conferred to him officially. But the fact that many called him Rabbi anyway, demonstrates that the title is not needfully connected to  a married man.

On Kiddushin 71b R. Yehudah of Pumbeditha is asked why his son, R. Yitzchak, is not yet married (and is an adult).

Kiddushin 82a does argue that an unmarried man cannot teach children, but this appears to be a concern about the appearance of impropriety, not a question about his ability or knowledge.

According to Rambam, getting married is highly recommended, even for a rabbi, but is not an absolute requirement. Perhaps in today's society it is less acceptable, but Halachically it is permitted, albeit not recommended.

http://judaism.stack...d-to-be-married

Edited by Jor-el, 27 April 2013 - 08:53 AM.

Posted Image


"Man is not the centre. God does not exist for the sake of man. Man does not exist for his own sake."

-C. S. Lewis


#13    Ben Masada

Ben Masada

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,986 posts
  • Joined:06 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel

Posted 29 April 2013 - 08:41 PM

View PostStarMountainKid, on 25 April 2013 - 01:36 AM, said:

I'm not an expert in these matters, but why not the OP's conjecture? I think Jesus as a married man would not be compatible with the idea of Jesus as Messiah, so his marriage would have been suppressed.

And I agree with you. Jesus' marriage was suppressed indeed but by the Church when the NT canon was organized. They had realized that to get "the son of God" as a married man on earth would be a serious complication to establish his divinity.


#14    Jor-el

Jor-el

    Knight of the Most High God

  • Member
  • 7,812 posts
  • Joined:12 Oct 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal

  • We are the sum of all that is, and has been. We will be the sum of our choices.

Posted 29 April 2013 - 08:47 PM

View PostBen Masada, on 29 April 2013 - 08:41 PM, said:

And I agree with you. Jesus' marriage was suppressed indeed but by the Church when the NT canon was organized. They had realized that to get "the son of God" as a married man on earth would be a serious complication to establish his divinity.

Why would that be the case?

Posted Image


"Man is not the centre. God does not exist for the sake of man. Man does not exist for his own sake."

-C. S. Lewis


#15    Ben Masada

Ben Masada

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,986 posts
  • Joined:06 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel

Posted 29 April 2013 - 08:48 PM

View PostSeeker79, on 25 April 2013 - 04:42 AM, said:

There seems to be more circumstantial evidence that he was maried than him being resurected. It's much more plausible to say the least.

And you can say that again. The idea that Jesus had resurrected came about only 30 years after he had been gone. The one who fabricated the idea was Paul as he himself confessed to his disciple Timothy that the resurrection of Jesus was according to his gospel. (2 Tim.2:8) It means that obviously there was another gospel being preached at the time in whose agenda resurrection never happened to Jesus. Besides, Jesus was Jewish and Jews do not believe in resurrection.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users