2nd point: Yes! That is correct and I fixed it a long time ago. I only learned afterwards how to put a superscript 2. I have only been seriously typing this past year and am improving all the time. I am still typing with one and two fingers and my eyesight is also diminishing. 16 hours plus a day and over fifty pages; there is bound to be errors. Thanks for this positive contribution. To clarify; it was more a lack of typing knowledge than a mistake.
1. ok, so if you want to have people laughing about your mistake, fine. The diagram itself is also wrong because the colours are mixed up and the origin or fate mentioned in the title is not represented at all. But it's your choice
2. So someone who has been researching this for decades is ignorant of the fact that the notation x/2 means "the variable x divided by 2"? And you make the claim that you have fixed it? Where? Not here. Look for yourself: http://www.unexplain...15#entry4538963
Ag shame, your eyes are failing you now. That's why you can't see your mistakes?