83 replies to this topic

[Saru]

Footage taken over Italy that shows two objects moving in the sky has been doing the rounds this week.

Gather.com said:

Although the videographer fiddles with the focus a bit too much, it's readily obvious that the multiple objects are not moving like any known aircraft. But it's how they behave aerodynamically which is the most confounding.

Read more...

[Eldorado]

They seem to be floating, like kites or dare I say it... the infamous lanterns.  Sure is strange though.

[Scepticus]

Do i dare say reflection from the window?

Yes I do  

[quillius]

Eldorado, on 09 January 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:

They seem to be floating, like kites or dare I say it... the infamous lanterns.  Sure is strange though.

Scepticus, on 09 January 2012 - 11:15 AM, said:

Do i dare say reflection from the window?Yes I do    

come on guys, really? Or are they both sarcastic responses  

[Jeffertonturner]

100% reflection on the window.

Next.

[Eldorado]

Scepticus, on 09 January 2012 - 11:15 AM, said:

Do i dare say reflection from the window?

Yes I do  

I never thought of that one.  Good call!  

[angi chiesa]

not aliens

[chainsawcam]

ffs - amateur time again

[FlyingAngel]

reflection of what? and where's the window?

[mandyks]

these are not reflections from some window, come on guys, why are you even here, it seem's to me as though you want to find faults in all, if you don't rearly believe then i suggest you go elsewhere for your entertainment.

Edited by mandyks, 09 January 2012 - 01:55 PM.

[Hazzard]

FlyingAngel, on 09 January 2012 - 01:11 PM, said:

reflection of what? and where's the window?

Its between the guy holding the camera and the outside of the house. The lightsource (white dots) is behind the fotographer reflecting on the window.

I say reflections aswell.

[Hazzard]

mandyks, on 09 January 2012 - 01:55 PM, said:

these are not reflections from some window, come on guys, why are you even here, it seem's to me as though you want to find faults in all, if you don't rearly believe then i suggest you go elsewhere for your entertainment.

Are you saying that only the gullible can be at this forum?

[Consumer]

I would, also, say ligthsource...but IMO and experienced filming out a window and the act of zooming in and out seems to shift the location of the reflected lightsource, keeping it from looking this valid.  Not saying it isn't, but personally I wouldn't feel right ruling anything out on that basis.  Plus the one filming seems to be fairly close to the window, if he/she zoomed in as much as they did wouldn't the light, anomally, look a lot bigger than that??? just throwing some questions and suggestions out there.

[Englishgent]

mandyks, on 09 January 2012 - 01:55 PM, said:

these are not reflections from some window, come on guys, why are you even here, it seem's to me as though you want to find faults in all, if you don't rearly believe then i suggest you go elsewhere for your entertainment.

It isnt a question of believing or not believing. Personally I believe in UFO's, having seen things in the past that I could not explain rationally but when presented with so called 'evidence' one must look at all the possiblilities of what it could be before stating that it is definitely a UFO....ie,,,unidentifed. It is not a question of finding faults and it certainly is not entertainment.
It is the gullible people of this world that make things more difficult due to their insistance, or refusal to believe,  that something does not have a natural explanation.
The whole point of this forum is to get opinions from different people in order to try and establish what an incident, or object in a film, photograph etc might actually be.

[quillius]

seems as though the suggestions of reflection or lanterns were not sarcastic.

One would have thought that any zooming would either remove the reflection, increase it in size and/or change position....none of these happened as far as I could tell, hence why I think it cannot be a reflection.

As for lanterns, well...not sure what to say apart from asking again...really?

edit to add: reading back it seems that the lanterns was not actually a suggestion, apologies.

Edited by quillius, 09 January 2012 - 02:25 PM.