381 replies to this topic

[booNyzarC]

Angel Left Wing, on 31 July 2012 - 06:59 AM, said:

So we've seen the mascots, now let's look at the 2012 London Olympics logo:

The "puzzle piece" like shapes are meant to be the numbers 2-0-1-2 representing the year 2012.

There's nothing unusual about that, but what's the purpose of the "dot-like" block in the middle? It doesn't having anything to do with the numbers and it doesn't relate to anything about the games or London either.

Well, not only can these "puzzle piece" like shapes be looked upon as the numbers 2-0-1-2, but they can also be representitive of the letters Z-I-O-N.

That's pretty neat, wouldn't you say?

And guess what, it also makes use of that "dot-like" block in the middle of the logo that seems to serve no purpose otherwise. (It does dot the "I" in Zion pretty nicely after all, doesn't it?)

And we can also kind of make it look like the one armed man...



Somebody call Richard Kimble!

[Coffey]

The thing is if you actually read the 2012 olmpics thing in order it actually says; ZOR.... LOL

Anyway I don't know if i beleive in  the illuminati. I do know that there is somehting wrong when 1 family has enough money to feed and house the world 3 times over.....  That makes me suspicious of how they play things. (even more so when most people without the internet have never heard of this family.... LOL)

Edited by Coffey, 01 August 2012 - 07:26 PM.

[Left-Field]

I just wanted to mention that I will address the comments people have made in response to things I've stated, but it may not be until later tonight.

I also wanted to mention I have no problem with people opposing my thoughts. All I ask for is that everyone be respectful to each other in discussing them.

As for the Illuminati in general, I will state that I don't particularly care if there is a group that goes by that name or not.

What I do care about is concern over prominent individuals that hold power and influential positions working in a combined effort to achieve goals that the large majority of individuals are not aware of and would very possibly oppose if they knew of such things.

Whether you call them the "Illuminati" or "The Pink Elephants" or any other name is of little importance.

Edited by Angel Left Wing, 01 August 2012 - 07:34 PM.

[spud the mackem]

Angel Left Wing, on 01 August 2012 - 05:05 AM, said:

No, they don't.

That said, it is the fact that the three primary showpieces of the 2012 Olympic Games (the stadium, mascots, and logo) can all be seen as items associated with the Illuminati.

Regarding the stadium pyramids, it isn't that they are simply pyramids. It is the fact that they have the lights placed only within the upper portion of these pyramids making them reminiscent of the "All Seeing Eye" that sits atop a pyramid.


All these advancements you speak of makes it far easier for such an organization to influence and manipulate the way people people behave.

It makes it that much easier for them to condition all of us to certain things. It makes it that much easier for them to distract people from paying attention to the important things going on which shape the world as opposed to following the entertainment and sports industries nonstop.

It also makes it easier for them to comminicate amongst each other.

Another thing is that one could reasonably argue a group such as the Illuminati already has control over the world.

Simply because they haven't come out and said it doesn't mean they aren't already manipulating and influencing our thoughts in a contrived and well thought out manner through what we see and hear on television, the internet, radio, newspaper and magazines.

Angel Left Wing, on 01 August 2012 - 05:05 AM, said:

No, they don't.

That said, it is the fact that the three primary showpieces of the 2012 Olympic Games (the stadium, mascots, and logo) can all be seen as items associated with the Illuminati.

Regarding the stadium pyramids, it isn't that they are simply pyramids. It is the fact that they have the lights placed only within the upper portion of these pyramids making them reminiscent of the "All Seeing Eye" that sits atop a pyramid.


All these advancements you speak of makes it far easier for such an organization to influence and manipulate the way people people behave.

It makes it that much easier for them to condition all of us to certain things. It makes it that much easier for them to distract people from paying attention to the important things going on which shape the world as opposed to following the entertainment and sports industries nonstop.

It also makes it easier for them to comminicate amongst each other.

Another thing is that one could reasonably argue a group such as the Illuminati already has control over the world.

Simply because they haven't come out and said it doesn't mean they aren't already manipulating and influencing our thoughts in a contrived and well thought out manner through what we see and hear on television, the internet, radio, newspaper and magazines.

   Hi Angel, I've been and read all your theories,and I think that you are maybe taking this too serious, ie:- the lights on top of the "pyramids" are so people and tv can see whats going on, no one would see a damn thing if the lights were at the bottom of the "pyramid" (which isnt a pyramid,its a steel structure with a modern design to hold up the lights),as far as your Iluminati go, (if they exist) as a secret society, just how do you imagine that they are hell bent on a world takeover,please get serious mate,the last guy who tried that ended up in a bunker with all his friends and staff deserting him,to the effect that he lost the last world war.The next world war will result in no winners,we shall all end up looking like crispy duck,and that won't benefit any secret society because they will be the same.

[Missi NuNu]

I don't really know what to say. But I have found all those things/theories that Angel Left Wing has posted, I was just too lazy to do it myself. So thanks ALW

I don't know if I believe it or not, but such a thing still has a probability of existing in the back of my mind. Just seems like quite a bit of symbolism to have it be attributed to a coincidence or to people being paranoid/looking for signs.

Yes, the stadium lights may be productive in the way they are designed but who knows, could just be a sneaky way to promote the symbol. That extra dot? I don't see where it fits in the original design. Not exactly necessary. But for all we know, some of us may just be crazy.

[Englishgent]

I think it is plainly obvious where the dot comes in. It;s a full stop!  

2012.

[Likely Guy]

Englishgent, on 02 August 2012 - 02:08 AM, said:

I think it is plainly obvious where the dot comes in. It;s a full stop!  

2012.

Bad dog.

[Likely Guy]

Okay here's my take;

The logo:

http://theweek.com/a...-logo-resembles

The 'all seing eyes' above the stadium:

They're reminiscent of the velarium above the Roman Colliseum. Do a google image search.

The 'mascot's single eyes';

They're supposed to be representaive of 'video cameras' so that they can record all their experiences.

Okay, the last part is creepy. More 'Big Brother', than either the 'Illuminati' or 'Zionists'. And I also thought that Illumanati and Zionist conspiracy theories were mutually exclusive?

/and the 'William Blake thing', was so far out there in Left Field, I don't know where you're coming from.

Edited by Likely Guy, 02 August 2012 - 05:39 AM.

[Dragonwind]

Angel Left Wing, on 31 July 2012 - 06:59 AM, said:

You know Im begining to think there is a conspiracy to use absolute rubbish design in mascots. Sydney's were terrible, Beijings horrendously awful and London's a completely diabolical abomination of design.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

Dragonwind, on 02 August 2012 - 09:07 AM, said:

You know Im begining to think there is a conspiracy to use absolute rubbish design in mascots. Sydney's were terrible, Beijings horrendously awful and London's a completely diabolical abomination of design.

I wonder if they agree, since I don't recall seeing them anywhere.

This is what a Mascot should look like:

[Junior Chubb]

MissNuNu your are being fed a pile of crap...

I cannot be bothered to build a defence on the issue because there is nothing to disprove.

[Junior Chubb]

Dragonwind, on 02 August 2012 - 09:07 AM, said:

You know Im begining to think there is a conspiracy to use absolute rubbish design in mascots. Sydney's were terrible, Beijings horrendously awful and London's a completely diabolical abomination of design.

I was not impressed by them either, but they are for kids. To my surprise my boy loves Wenlock and ties him to the front of his bike when we go out cycling...
This has brought me round and I like them now, same with the logo.

This Olympics has been a breath of fresh air, the Logo the Mascots and the Opening Ceremony have broken the mould. Maybe we are just getting old and don't like change...

Edited by Junior Chubb, 02 August 2012 - 12:11 PM.

[Emma_Acid]

Angel Left Wing, on 01 August 2012 - 07:33 PM, said:

I just wanted to mention that I will address the comments people have made in response to things I've stated, but it may not be until later tonight.

I also wanted to mention I have no problem with people opposing my thoughts. All I ask for is that everyone be respectful to each other in discussing them.

As for the Illuminati in general, I will state that I don't particularly care if there is a group that goes by that name or not.

What I do care about is concern over prominent individuals that hold power and influential positions working in a combined effort to achieve goals that the large majority of individuals are not aware of and would very possibly oppose if they knew of such things.

Whether you call them the "Illuminati" or "The Pink Elephants" or any other name is of little importance.

Call them what you want, but I think the whole idea from the very beginning is nonsensical. Name one - one - event where a conspiracy has turned out to be true and the conspirators have gone through great lengths to advertise their existence beforehand.

Junior Chubb, on 02 August 2012 - 12:08 PM, said:

This Olympics has been a breath of fresh air, the Logo the Mascots and the Opening Ceremony have broken the mould. Maybe we are just getting old and don't like change...

If the change is not being able to get to work in the morning, then no.

[Junior Chubb]

Emma_Acid, on 02 August 2012 - 01:49 PM, said:

If the change is not being able to get to work in the morning, then no.

Lol, I travel away from Stratford to get to work so I haven't witnessed the carnage yet. Is it really that bad?

I have been cycling to the 'Live sites' (Victoria Park, Tower Bridge and Hyde Park) from East London and the road traffic doesn't seem to bad. But I am not leaving before 9am and not using the train, so miss the worst of the travel.

Edited by Junior Chubb, 02 August 2012 - 01:56 PM.

[Emma_Acid]

Junior Chubb, on 02 August 2012 - 01:56 PM, said:

Lol, I travel away from Stratford to get to work so I haven't witnessed the carnage yet. Is it really that bad?

I have been cycling to the 'Live sites' (Victoria Park, Tower Bridge and Hyde Park) from East London and the road traffic doesn't seem to bad. But I am not leaving before 9am and not using the train, so miss the worst of the travel.

Trying to get the Overground to Camden's been murder. Apparently "regulating the system" means "cancelling every other train". Odd.