10148 replies to this topic

[seeder]

AMARUKHAN111666888, on 19 January 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

• The region was flooded by tsunami that reached over 4000 meter high.

REALLY?   A tsunami 2.5 miles high?  Would you mind telling me where that info comes from, perhaps give me a link to it?

I was under the impression the tallest tsunami ever recorded is the 1958 Lituya Bay mega tsunami, which had a record height of 524 m (1740 ft).

http://en.wikipedia....hest_or_tallest

Mind you, as Im not a fan of Tsunami's I had to look that one up.

So yes please, post your source/link. Id like to know more

[Slave2Fate]

zoser, on 19 January 2013 - 09:49 AM, said:

Try it with clay.  The block can still be extracted even if the tool doesn't penetrate right into the corner.  I've tried it and it still works.  That's not the flaw I'm getting at.

But it is still a flaw and throws the 'super precision' claim into question. You say the slabs might have been further finished after extraction however if they (aliens) have the ability to cut stone like that then why weren't they 'super precise' with the extraction so the slabs didn't need to be finished? It certainly seems like a very strange method to suddenly get sloppy with.

Edit to add: Furthermore, I'm not convinced that any slabs were even extracted from that area. Look at the shape of the rock, any slabs would not have been square along all of the edges anyway. The 'cuts' weren't deep enough into the rock.

Edited by Slave2Fate, 19 January 2013 - 06:42 PM.

[zoser]

Slave2Fate, on 19 January 2013 - 06:36 PM, said:

But it is still a flaw and throws the 'super precision' claim into question. You say the slabs might have been further finished after extraction however if they (aliens) have the ability to cut stone like that then why weren't they 'super precise' with the extraction so the slabs didn't need to be finished? It certainly seems like a very strange method to suddenly get sloppy with.

I would have thought that depends on the original shape of the outcrop.  Maybe later extractions were perfect cuboids once they were deep into the outcrop. Who knows?


Edit to add: Furthermore, I'm not convinced that any slabs were even extracted from that area. Look at the shape of the rock, any slabs would not have been square along all of the edges anyway.

The 'cuts' weren't deep enough into the rock.


Bear in mind that we don't know how high the outcrop originally was.  The blocks may have been several feet in height or much more.  We are only looking at what stone is left.  Look at my previous images that show these extractions several feet in height:

http://www.unexplain...85#entry4626077

I'll share my reservation with you about the block extraction in soft stone idea because I still haven't solved it yet:

There is no sign of over-cutting.  

Imagine how you would cut a cuboid out of clay with a knife.  On at least one side you would be bound to cut in deeper than required.  The images show no such sign of over cuts and I'm having difficulty coming up with how they would have extracted a block without doing this.  It's not a deal breaker but I would be happier if there was a feasible answer to this.

Edited by zoser, 19 January 2013 - 07:01 PM.

[Abramelin]

Zoser,

You will never really respond to what I posted about the Romans, right?

Like you will never really respond to what I posted about the Inca style buildings constructed during colonial times.

You said they used mortar, and I explained to you and I showed you they didn't.

[sslama]

The Inca's didn't use morta and their huge granite stones fit together so completely a needle won't fit between them.  It's a mystery how they cut these huge stones.   It's impossible to cut them without using laser.  None of these buildings used mortor, yet these rocks seemed fused together.  Studies done in Peru said the limestone is subjected to high temperatures and pressures and other compounds found on the surface of the stones were not natural so it has been added.  The question still remains....how was the heat produced to treat these structures?  The amt of heat used to fire these huge stones would have enormous.  They just don't know yet!

[seeder]

sslama, on 20 January 2013 - 01:36 AM, said:

The Inca's didn't use morta and their huge granite stones fit together so completely a needle won't fit between them.  It's a mystery how they cut these huge stones.   It's impossible to cut them without using laser.  None of these buildings used mortor, yet these rocks seemed fused together.  Studies done in Peru said the limestone is subjected to high temperatures and pressures and other compounds found on the surface of the stones were not natural so it has been added.  The question still remains....how was the heat produced to treat these structures?  The amt of heat used to fire these huge stones would have enormous.  They just don't know yet!

oh dear. They know alright. we know too. You just havent read much of this thread.. there is no mystery

[musk]

Alphamale06, on 17 November 2012 - 06:04 AM, said:

I have been a devoted Christian for many years, however, when you add the Ancient Alien Theory to the Biblical story... It all starts to make complete sense... These ancient people had no reference points to accurately describe what they were witnessing. Anyone who lived in those times would have referred these aliens to being gods and angels...

http://www.bibliotec...es.htm#contents

check this site out and see if it helps or if it confuses you more

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

Abramelin, on 19 January 2013 - 11:37 PM, said:

You will never really respond to what I posted about the Romans, right?

"Show me where there is precision stonework in Greece/Rome, and then we can talk".
We both know that he's not going to engage with Rome et al because it doesn't fit with his view of history.

[psyche101]

AMARUKHAN111666888, on 19 January 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

• The region was flooded by tsunami that reached over 4000 meter high.

I beg your pardon?? 4 Kilometers high?

I don't think so.

[Myles]

zoser, on 18 January 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

The technology was not available to the Aymara indians.  Plus on the AA documentary they made the obvious point that such an endeavour would need planning, blueprints, language, logistics writing, number skills, and this is something the Aymara were known not to possess.
.

It's not smart to use an entertainment show as your proof.
Also it is not a documentary.

[Myles]

zoser, on 19 January 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:

I can't answer that.  For now I'm just trying to make sense of the pictorial evidence and read what it tells us.

Yes, yes we remember how you said that if it is on video than it is true.

[psyche101]

sslama, on 20 January 2013 - 01:36 AM, said:

The Inca's didn't use morta and their huge granite stones fit together so completely a needle won't fit between them.  It's a mystery how they cut these huge stones.   It's impossible to cut them without using laser.  None of these buildings used mortor, yet these rocks seemed fused together.  Studies done in Peru said the limestone is subjected to high temperatures and pressures and other compounds found on the surface of the stones were not natural so it has been added.  The question still remains....how was the heat produced to treat these structures?  The amt of heat used to fire these huge stones would have enormous.  They just don't know yet!

Copied and pasted from another site into a new thread instead of completing the conversation we already have going? That seems a shame.


LINK - The Dumbasses Guide To Knowledge The Evidence For Ancient Stone Cutting

[psyche101]

Abramelin, on 19 January 2013 - 11:37 PM, said:

Zoser,

You will never really respond to what I posted about the Romans, right?

Like you will never really respond to what I posted about the Inca style buildings constructed during colonial times.

You said they used mortar, and I explained to you and I showed you they didn't.

He does not respond to questions that have been answered to my experience.

He will post a dozen more Youtube clips, call them documentaries (on purpose I understand to annoy critical thinkers for the hell of it), ask some equally basic questions, and then after a few pages when it seems safe, the same question will reappear. Same in every thread, same for every question, That is why earlier I expressed such amazement at your seemingly never-ending patience with this particular troll. If I had a hat on right now, I would tip it to you.

Edited by psyche101, 20 January 2013 - 03:35 AM.

[psyche101]

Slave2Fate, on 19 January 2013 - 06:36 PM, said:

But it is still a flaw and throws the 'super precision' claim into question. You say the slabs might have been further finished after extraction however if they (aliens) have the ability to cut stone like that then why weren't they 'super precise' with the extraction so the slabs didn't need to be finished? It certainly seems like a very strange method to suddenly get sloppy with.

Edit to add: Furthermore, I'm not convinced that any slabs were even extracted from that area. Look at the shape of the rock, any slabs would not have been square along all of the edges anyway. The 'cuts' weren't deep enough into the rock.

What I find the most astounding is things like unfinished examples, broken core holes and the like.

If that is not outright proof that man used our principals to do that, and that we not only did it, but thought up the method ourselves, I do not know what could be considered direct evidence. It's virtually our thumbprint on the work.

[AMARUKHAN111666888]

psyche101, on 20 January 2013 - 02:23 AM, said:

I beg your pardon?? 4 Kilometers high?

I don't think so.

seeder, on 19 January 2013 - 05:42 PM, said:

REALLY?   A tsunami 2.5 miles high?  Would you mind telling me where that info comes from, perhaps give me a link to it?

I was under the impression the tallest tsunami ever recorded is the 1958 Lituya Bay mega tsunami, which had a record height of 524 m (1740 ft).

http://en.wikipedia....hest_or_tallest

Mind you, as Im not a fan of Tsunami's I had to look that one up.

So yes please, post your source/link. Id like to know more

• I came to the conclusion about the tsunami based on the remains of sea animals  scattered around the high land of  the Andes, fish bones in Atacama desert and Arica, dolphins'  skeletons en Arequipa, sea shell on the peaks of the Andes,  Ancient coral present. muscles found in Tiwanaku soil, sea horses living in lake Titikaka.or
  
• the highland of the Andes was on sea level and it rose up with its ancient cities.