Naomi Wolf on False Flags

[Professor Buzzkill]

It's a wonder why so few people in the West consider opinions like Naomi's. Clip highlight the motivations behind major events in our world. Also touches on how history is full of false flags, but they are only recognized when the perpetrators are no longer in a position to be held accountable.

[Likely Guy]

Naomi Wolf has apparently "lost it". How is she an authority on the subjects that she currently speaks of? In my opinion she 's scrambling to remain valid to an ever diminishing audience.

Edit to add "currently".

Edited January 16, 2015 by Likely Guy

[preacherman76]

Of course you think she "lost it" Guy. Cause if she didn't, then you are wrong about nearly your entire world view. I understand how that must be defended at all costs. Even if you don't actually say anything to prove her wrong other then personal attacks.

[Rafterman]

She's a total nutter and has found a happy home (and a paycheck) from the InfoWars crowd. I found this review especially poignant.

Charles C. W. Cooke observed at the National Review Online, "Over the last eight years, Naomi Wolf has written hysterically about coups and about vaginas and about little else besides. She has repeatedly insisted that the country is on the verge of martial law, and transmogrified every threat—both pronounced and overhyped—into a government-led plot to establish a dictatorship. She has made prediction after prediction that has simply not come to pass. Hers are not sober and sensible forecasts of runaway human nature, institutional atrophy, and constitutional decline, but psychedelic fever-dreams that are more typically suited to the InfoWars crowd."^[73] Under the headline "Naomi Wolf Went Off the Deep End Long Ago," The American Spectator advised, "Her words must be taken not just with a grain of salt, but a full shaker's worth."^[74]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf

[Rlyeh]

Of course you think she "lost it" Guy. Cause if she didn't, then you are wrong about nearly your entire world view. I understand how that must be defended at all costs. Even if you don't actually say anything to prove her wrong other then personal attacks.

Isn't that what more or less you do?

[Mr.United_Nations]

Read the wiki on her, she is one strange woman

"In October 2014, Wolf again aroused controversy, with a series of Facebook posts questioning the authenticity of videos that purported to show beheadings of two Americans and two Britons by the Islamic State, implying that they had been staged by the U.S. government and that the victims and their parents were actors. Wolf also charged that the U.S. was dispatching troops not to assist in treating the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa but to carry the disease back home to justify a military takeover of America. She further said that the Scottish independence referendum, in which Scots voted to remain in the United Kingdom, was faked.^[71]Speaking about this at a demonstration in Glasgow on October 12, Wolf said, "I truly believe it was rigged."^[72] "

[Rafterman]

Read the wiki on her, she is one strange woman

"In October 2014, Wolf again aroused controversy, with a series of Facebook posts questioning the authenticity of videos that purported to show beheadings of two Americans and two Britons by the Islamic State, implying that they had been staged by the U.S. government and that the victims and their parents were actors. Wolf also charged that the U.S. was dispatching troops not to assist in treating the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa but to carry the disease back home to justify a military takeover of America. She further said that the Scottish independence referendum, in which Scots voted to remain in the United Kingdom, was faked.^[71]Speaking about this at a demonstration in Glasgow on October 12, Wolf said, "I truly believe it was rigged."^[72] "

Exactly. Basically anything and everything in the news is a false flag of one sort or another.

Giver her credit, though, she knows what plays - vaginas and crazy talk.

[quiXilver]

I have no idea who you're all talking about, but man, it just blows my mind that anyone would ever quote, or believe Wiki as a source of anything other than 'some random person's opinion'...

[Empty Garden]

Naomi Wolf has apparently "lost it". How is she an authority on the subjects that she currently speaks of? In my opinion she 's scrambling to remain valid to an ever diminishing audience.

Edit to add "currently".

Have you ever read any of her books? I have read only one, "Disaster Capitalism", and it was excellent. Very well researched and documented. Footnotes all over the place.

If you are suggesting that false flags are not a traditional military or political tactic, you are wrong. False flags serve a valid purpose in achieving deception.

[Likely Guy]

Have you ever read any of her books? I have read only one, "Disaster Capitalism", and it was excellent. Very well researched and documented. Footnotes all over the place.

If you are suggesting that false flags are not a traditional military or political tactic, you are wrong. False flags serve a valid purpose in achieving deception.

You're thinking of Naomi Klein.

Of course there have been false flags but just because there has been doesn't mean that every event is a false flag.

[Mr.United_Nations]

I have no idea who you're all talking about, but man, it just blows my mind that anyone would ever quote, or believe Wiki as a source of anything other than 'some random person's opinion'...

I have no idea who you're all talking about, but man, it just blows my mind that anyone would ever quote, or believe Wiki as a source of anything other than 'some random person's opinion'...

http://www.vox.com/2014/10/5/6909837/naomi-wolf-isis-ebola-scotland-conspiracy-theories

it's all there

[Likely Guy]

I have no idea who you're all talking about, but man, it just blows my mind that anyone would ever quote, or believe Wiki as a source of anything other than 'some random person's opinion'...

'Some random person's opinion', just like Naomi Wolf?

[Likely Guy]

The wiki article has 76 footnotes, please feel free to contest anyone of them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf

Edited January 17, 2015 by Likely Guy

[quiXilver]

No, I'm not knocking Ms. Wolf. I'm knocking information on Wiki.

[Rlyeh]

No, I'm not knocking Ms. Wolf. I'm knocking information on Wiki.

A bit of a double standard. At least the wiki usually cites sources.

[Likely Guy]

No, I'm not knocking Ms. Wolf. I'm knocking information on Wiki.

Sure, you can add whatever you want and go to [need citation] to being bounced out of the site within an hour. They actually have editors and fact checkers, and that is actually real journalism.

Edited January 17, 2015 by Likely Guy

[preacherman76]

Isn't that what more or less you do?

No. Not at all. In fact I hardly come to this section anymore cause its turned into a attack the conspiracy theorist free for all. Ive spent more time trying to get people to stay on topic and not personally attack others, then our mods have done.

Edited January 17, 2015 by preacherman76

[Rlyeh]

No. Not at all. In fact I hardly come to this section anymore cause its turned into a attack the conspiracy theorist free for all. Ive spent more time trying to get people to stay on topic and not personally attack others, then our mods have done.

Maybe you should spend more time reading because his comment was on Naomi Wolf, sure he attacked her but like I said, you do the same thing; attacking sources you can't refute. Edited January 17, 2015 by Rlyeh

[preacherman76]

Well I cant say I have never attacked a source, but its not like that's all I do. I also spend plenty of time refuting the source I attack, so I don't know what you are talking about. I choose to try and stay on the offense rather then defense.

Why don't you point that high powered finger of perception at yourself? You not only attack source, but personally attack members who post here all the time. Often unprovoked. Just cause you disagree with a opinion directly related to the OP.

edit to add- just look at this thread for example, all you have done is personally attack people. Saying little to nothing about the OP at all. You seem to do this in every thread where we are both in on the conversation. Every time unprovoked. Its like you don't seem to have the ability to talk about any given subject

Edited January 17, 2015 by preacherman76

[Rlyeh]

Why don't you point that high powered finger of perception at yourself? You not only attack source, but personally attack members who post here all the time. Often unprovoked. Just cause you disagree with a opinion directly related to the OP.

edit to add- just look at this thread for example, all you have done is personally attack people. Saying little to nothing about the OP at all. You seem to do this in every thread where we are both in on the conversation. Every time unprovoked. Its like you don't seem to have the ability to talk about any given subject

That's right, I attack people unprovoked, even on this thread. Is there anything else you'd like to accuse me of while having another of your "victim" episodes?

[preacherman76]

Victim??? You think Im pointing out your bitterness and anger cause Im hurt by it? No no no. I feel sorry for you. You are the victim, of your own self doubt. Its why you feel the need to constantly point out perceived flaws of others. But hey if it makes you feel better about your self, you can say whatever you want about me. Honestly Im not gonna lose a second of sleep over it.

[Empty Garden]

You're thinking of Naomi Klein.

Of course there have been false flags but just because there has been doesn't mean that every event is a false flag.

Thank you for pointing that out--yes, the wrong Naomi.

But false flag operations are rather a standard tool in the military toolbox, aren't they?

[regeneratia]

I really liked Ole Dammogard's instructions on how to spot a false flag. He is remarkable on this assessments.

http://lightonconspiracies.com/

http://www.redicecre.../RIR-150223.php

I am super-tired of the dumbed down.

People, it is time to Smart Up.

Edited February 26, 2015 by regeneratia