Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Noah's Ark Found? Company Claims Satellite Proof


Triniant

Recommended Posts

user posted imageSatellite photos of Mount Aratat, Turkey taken by commercial imaging satellite company Digital Globe released today are said to contain proof of the existence of the biblical Noah's Ark.The images, revealed at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. (see left), are said to reveal a man-made structure at the site where the Bible states the vessel came to rest.The claim was made by Daniel P. McGivern, president of Shamrock -- The Trinity Corporation, who according to a press release has been searching for the Ark for several years.The first pictures of the site were taken by the U.S. Air Force in 1949. The images allegedly revealed what seemed to be a structure covered by ice, but were held in a confidential file labeled “Ararat Anomaly” for years. In 1997, the government released several of these images, but experts deemed them inconclusive.McGovern's is not the first satellite search for the Ark. In 2002, Porcher Taylor, a senior associate (nonresident) at the prominent think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C., also requested satellite imagery of the area to see if the mythical vessel truly existed.The summer of 2003 provided a great opportunity to take a new series of photographs, according to the release, because it was the hottest summer in Europe since 1500. This caused a massive meltdown on Mount Ararat. McGivern used DigitalGlobe’s Quick Bird satellite to collect a new set of satellite images.According to the press release, McGivern has put together a team of scientists, archaeologists and forensic experts to excavate the object and collect samples beginning in August of this year.

“These new photos unequivocally show a man made object,” McGivern is quoted as saying. “I am convinced that the excavation of the object and the results of tests run on any collected samples will prove that it is Noah’s Ark.”The field manager for the excavation will be Dr. Ahmet Ali Arslan, a native of Turkey who has traveled up Mount Ararat 50 times in 40 years and formerly worked in the Turkey Prime Minister’s office. According to the release, Arslan plans to discuss the details of the excavation with the Prime Minister next week.

user posted image View: Full Article | Source: space.com

Edited by SaRuMaN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Skela

    2

  • Scorpius

    2

  • DC09

    2

  • Weebumbar

    1

Looks more like a giant dog poop to me. People see what they want to see. Today it was dog poop, tomorrow a wooden donkey. Cmon it can be anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it.

Looks like part of the mountain to me...

yep - BIG Rock.

But as looks can be deceiving, we will have to wait until their team get there, I hope it isn't a wasted journey.

All that way..... to discover IT IS A BIG ROCK!!

whistling2.gif

maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a web search for Daniel P. McGivern, Shamrock, and The Trinity Corporation, but I didn't get any relevent hits other than the exact same article quoted over and over again. I wonder if they exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think it is the Trojan horse. rolleyes.gif *coughrockcoughformationcough*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure I saw this on panorama years ago...

I remember that - long-winded program which ended with them saying "it's probably a rock....but we don't know."

If I remeber correctly they spent most of the time convicing the autorities they weren't spies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what evidence that they have to prove that it is Noah's Ark and why Noah's?? Can't it be just an Ark made by someone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could this great flood have covered Atlantis which drove a man to build an ark and gather as much animals as he can... whistling2.gif

Does the story of Noah's Ark hold some truth afterall?

We'll have to wait and see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a programme on BBC2 bout a month ago discounting this picture, which was strangely enough originally covered up by the CIA years ago.

They had experts on saying that anything like an ark wouldve been pushed down the mountain due to glacier movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or crushed by the pressure.

Btw I was correct... today it's a wooden donkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that this is a great discovery... this anomaly has brought out many opinions. i believe that it is the ark, and if it is proven to be the ark this would confirm all judeau christian beliefs, and inturn would begin a big change in the world as we know it today. of course there would always be skepticism, but for the most part would have a big impact on this worlds outcome... who knows it might spark a judeau christian revolution and be the beginning of the end of the world as prophecised in the bible.

refuse the mark of the beast...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the story of Noah's Ark, about a man and his family gathering the many animals of this earth into one huge ship--the ark. Then the family stayed in the Ark until the great flood of earth, that wiped out any other living thing on land, slowly died down. A raven and a dove were flown out to find land. The raven never returned but the dove came back with a twig. So, then Noah sailed his Ark towards land.

This is how it goes, right?

How can one man gather all the animals on earth into this Ark? There are thousands, if not millions, of species of animals on this earth. How can he have done this? He's no Charles Darwin. Unless he sailed across the flood onto other lands to rescue other animals... huh.gif

Anyways, if he did not rescue all the animals on earth, that one bit of the story, is false and overexaggerated, which truly makes it a tall-tale.

====

On a more convincing note...

This story can be true to a point. If not all the land on earth was overwhelmed by the waters of the ocean, there may have been other lands that have been left alone. The people who would have only been struck by the great flood were those living in Europe, Africe, and Asia. This leaves parts of North America, South America, and Australia alone.

The Natives (people) of these lands would have been left alone to survive; they were not part of the chaos and destruction that was held in the other three main continents.

Brennan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.