keithisco Posted March 18, 2013 #1 Share Posted March 18, 2013 My first interpretation of what Boeing is proposing is that it is insufficient, does not address the core problems, and that , during an APU failure then the Battery back - up (28 - 32Vdc) does not provide a robust mitigation. In terms of Functional Safety then I remain highly sceptical of their proposals with the real potential for Catastrophic consequences in the above scenario... Read more (thanks to The New York Times) http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/business/boeing-details-its-fixes-for-787.html?_r=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now