4
Marks_Thoughts, on 08 October 2012 - 04:08 AM, said:
I once had a professor who was a specialist on political assassinations. His theory, as explained before he died at a very young age of heart failure, with his research unpublished:
JFK, following in the footsteps of FDR was a closet socialist. His campaign and his personal wealth were partly the result of funds sent to him and the democrats, a small group at the top, who were determined to eventually impose the kind of rule found in the Soviet Union.
Cuba fell apart prior to JFK coming into office, but during his tenure the CIA decided to invade. The US Navy had aircraft with all markings painted over that were to support the invasion. The initial bombing of Cuba by the CIA actually accomplished what was expected, which was not the total destruction of the Cuban airforce. The Navy air cover was essential. Kennedy refused the order to fly in support of the Bay of Pigs and a debacle ensued.
Interestingly, the professor stated that he had found that large sums of money flowed from Cuba to Caribean banks, to the US and US banks, and gone at just that time. He was searching for the final landing of the money. He believed it went into a secret democrat-controlled account.
The CIA determined that the president was, in fact, not working for the benefit of the American people and was part of the Leftist opposition they faced all over the globe.
The Cuban missile crisis followed. Again, the sides were clear in the eyes of the CIA and again the American people were short-changed. Why? Because the US made it clear they would never invade or work to remove the Castros from power. The Soviets viewed this result as a huge victory that made the Monroe Doctrine null and void. Hence, they could do what they wanted all over Central and South America, which has been the clear result.
Kennedy dies in Dallas, Texas.
What tied the whole thing together for the professor was that the Watergate Burglary was so tightly controlled and executed by the same group that had planned and executed the Bay of Pigs. They risked their lives and reputations on the chance that they could find the real accounting ledgers of the democratic party at the location they were caught. Ever notice that no real specifics of what they were really after ever came out? What else would cause a group of paper-pushers essentially to keep this so closed that they included not one real professional thief to help them?
Remember, this was only possible because LBJ was out of office. He was fine with the death of JFK, he benefited greatly from the event and was certainly part of it. However, he would almost certainly not have been fond of his party being tainted with close ties to Cuban and Soviet communists who were contributing to democrat elections and activities.
JFK, following in the footsteps of FDR was a closet socialist. His campaign and his personal wealth were partly the result of funds sent to him and the democrats, a small group at the top, who were determined to eventually impose the kind of rule found in the Soviet Union.
Cuba fell apart prior to JFK coming into office, but during his tenure the CIA decided to invade. The US Navy had aircraft with all markings painted over that were to support the invasion. The initial bombing of Cuba by the CIA actually accomplished what was expected, which was not the total destruction of the Cuban airforce. The Navy air cover was essential. Kennedy refused the order to fly in support of the Bay of Pigs and a debacle ensued.
Interestingly, the professor stated that he had found that large sums of money flowed from Cuba to Caribean banks, to the US and US banks, and gone at just that time. He was searching for the final landing of the money. He believed it went into a secret democrat-controlled account.
The CIA determined that the president was, in fact, not working for the benefit of the American people and was part of the Leftist opposition they faced all over the globe.
The Cuban missile crisis followed. Again, the sides were clear in the eyes of the CIA and again the American people were short-changed. Why? Because the US made it clear they would never invade or work to remove the Castros from power. The Soviets viewed this result as a huge victory that made the Monroe Doctrine null and void. Hence, they could do what they wanted all over Central and South America, which has been the clear result.
Kennedy dies in Dallas, Texas.
What tied the whole thing together for the professor was that the Watergate Burglary was so tightly controlled and executed by the same group that had planned and executed the Bay of Pigs. They risked their lives and reputations on the chance that they could find the real accounting ledgers of the democratic party at the location they were caught. Ever notice that no real specifics of what they were really after ever came out? What else would cause a group of paper-pushers essentially to keep this so closed that they included not one real professional thief to help them?
Remember, this was only possible because LBJ was out of office. He was fine with the death of JFK, he benefited greatly from the event and was certainly part of it. However, he would almost certainly not have been fond of his party being tainted with close ties to Cuban and Soviet communists who were contributing to democrat elections and activities.
Whew....the imagination runs utterly kook fringe!
Edited by MID, 11 October 2012 - 12:54 AM.
