By all means of respect, but how do you feel you can judge my comments if you haven't even read the full article? How can you make any qualified comments when you clearly do not understand what he is trying to convey?
The first few paragraph were what was important.
And you know this how? He asks the question what the 11 dimensions are, uses bungled up physics and then goes on to tie in mysticism. Please do elaborate on how anything in his article is important in any way.
He is trying to understand what the 11 dimensions are. He suggest that it is heat. He is probably wrong but who can say he is wrong.
Yes, he is wrong. Not only can he not describe even basic physics (bungling up heat and temperature), but heat can by the mathematical requirements to the dimensions not be a dimension.
We feel the effect of gravity that how we know it exist.
Yet, it was not defined a 1000 years ago. We don't even have a grasp of gravity today. We have theories to predict the effects of gravity, but that is about it. Same with the 11 dimensions. The M-theory explains things that other theories don't. Exactly the same thing.
You cannot do use the same idea to understand the 11 dimensions.
Yes, I can.
You are believing something that you cannot feel, touch or any of the other senses. So how do you know they existence? All we have is mathematic.
The same with Gravity. We have a mathematical theory describing gravity. It works. There is M-theory using 11 dimensions that describes other observable facts. It works.
Edited by badeskov, 08 January 2012 - 06:42 AM.