1834 replies to this topic

[Little Fish]

Gummug, on 15 February 2013 - 07:12 PM, said:

Is this link trustworthy?

Jonathan cole is a widely respected researcher, you'll notice the case he presents in the video is based on logic, evidence and experiment and proves the debunkers wrong (again) when they repeatedly state thermite "cannot melt steel", "cannot cut horizontally", and all their other unevidenced dismissals. so who presents a better case? the anonymous internet personality skyeagle's unevidenced dismissals, or Joanthan Cole who shows you it is possible and furthermore consistent with the damage reported in the fema appendix c report? not that these experiments were even necessary since the world has known for a long time the temperatures generated by thermite are far in excess of the melting point of steel.

Edited by Little Fish, 15 February 2013 - 07:55 PM.

[skyeagle409]

Gummug, on 15 February 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:

OK Skyeagle, how about this one though? I mean, I had heard before about trucks arriving after everyone left and leaving about 5 am before anyone got there. Workers, but working on what?

That whole video is shrouded is lies and disinformation. Simply amazing. The woman spoke of trucks coming in the early morning hours but that is an optimal time to conduct heavy maintenance on large buildings. Furthermore, it took about half a year to prepare a bridge in Corpus Christi for demolition and that was at ground-level, yet we are being led to believe by the video that crews prepared the WTC buildings at high levels of those buildings for demolition in 10 to 11 days! What a joke!! It takes months to prepare buildings much smaller than the WTC buildings for demolition.

At time line; 3:50, I guess the guy was unaware that falling elevators were responsible for the sounds of explosions, which firefighters later admitted.  Time line 6:40 and afterward, does not depict molten steel by any means. The sound of constant explosions at time line 8:00 and afterward, are lies because there is no evidence of explosions in any of the WTC videos. Around time line 9:00, it is stated there were flashes, but looking at the videos, there are no demolition flashes. At time line 9:11, they mention  horizanal ejections, but since most of the interior of a building is air, the ejects were nothing more than air. At time line 13:50 and onward, it is very clear the guy is not telling the truth and he knows it. He sees his audience as nothing more than a bunch of suckers who can be easily duped with lies and disinformation.

Beginning at time line 21:00 it is very clear they are lying through their teeth. One woman says it didn't look like a commercial airliner, but let's take a look at the photo.





The video is full of lies and disinformation and cannot be taken seriously.

Edited by skyeagle409, 15 February 2013 - 08:56 PM.

[skyeagle409]

Little Fish, on 15 February 2013 - 07:53 PM, said:

Jonathan cole is a widely respected researcher, you'll notice the case he presents in the video is based on logic, evidence and experiment and proves the debunkers wrong (again) when they repeatedly state thermite "cannot melt steel", "cannot cut horizontally", and all their other unevidenced dismissals. so who presents a better case? the anonymous internet personality skyeagle's unevidenced dismissals, or Joanthan Cole who shows you it is possible and furthermore consistent with the damage reported in the fema appendix c report? not that these experiments were even necessary since the world has known for a long time the temperatures generated by thermite are far in excess of the melting point of steel.

Reality time!! Thermite cannot demolish buildings the size of the WTC Towers and is not widely used by the demolition industry for demolition implosions because it is not effective. In addition, there were no thermite cuts noted on any of the steel columns recovered from ground zero.

Edited by skyeagle409, 15 February 2013 - 09:10 PM.

[skyeagle409]

Little Fish, on 15 February 2013 - 07:53 PM, said:

Jonathan cole is a widely respected researcher, you'll notice the case he presents in the video is based on logic, evidence and experiment and proves the debunkers wrong (again) when they repeatedly state thermite "cannot melt steel", "cannot cut horizontally", and all their other unevidenced dismissals. so who presents a better case? the anonymous internet personality skyeagle's unevidenced dismissals, or Joanthan Cole who shows you it is possible and furthermore consistent with the damage reported in the fema appendix c report? not that these experiments were even necessary since the world has known for a long time the temperatures generated by thermite are far in excess of the melting point of steel.

It is all very simple to understand why thermite is not used for demolition implosions by the demolition industry. It is incapable of bringing down buildings the size of the WTC towers and all it takes is to look at the construction of the WTC buildings to understand why.

Quote

WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory

Indications of the Imminent Collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings Disprove Explosives Theory

http://www.represent...Explosives.html

Edited by skyeagle409, 15 February 2013 - 09:07 PM.

[Little Fish]

skyeagle409, on 15 February 2013 - 08:59 PM, said:

Reality time!!

in your opinion, can thermite cut through steel beams horizontally?

[frenat]

Babe Ruth, on 15 February 2013 - 06:30 PM, said:

Yes, Frenat, you know I don't fly, and you know that there was a Boeing at Shanksville and the Pentagon.  I do understand sir.  The conscious exclusion of painful desires or thoughts from awareness is a common trait amongst humans.  It is more important to be happy than it is to acknowledge the truth.

And yet AGAIN you do not address the topic.  Is this your way of conceding that the stories of hijackers supposedly still being alive all stopped after the FBI released the official list?  Or are you just avoiding it because you know you don't have a leg to stand on?

[Gummug]

Stundie, on 15 February 2013 - 02:34 PM, said:

Lets look at what those at GZ actually had to say about the molten metal....

!

• Firefighters say they saw molten steel, the guy in the background is nodding his head in agreement and there are other firefighters who are not in the shot, one is heard saying "yeah" off camera and not a single person disgrees with his assertions. They obviously have all witnessed it.
  
• Another guy says molten beams/steel was being dug up.
  
• 2 people talking about the fusion of molten steel and concrete on the piece that is known as the meteorite
  
• Guys looking at the horseshoe I beam says it takes thousands of degrees to bend this piece without any cracks.
  
• Another person says he saw big pieces of iron being pulled out of the rubble which will litterally being on fire.
  
• Move big pieces of steel to reveal these fires, these fires of hell.
  
• A person speaking says it's been like this since day one and 6 weeks when they look insides its a bright red/orange inside.
  
• Another talks about the diggers opening up the pockets and that at point, he think they were about 2800 degrees.
  
• A persons talks about these 2 seperate steel beams metled together to form a cross.

Conclusion, it was molten aluminium.

At the very end of this video, one man says he was going to ask the investigator for his email address so he could send him thermal images from the satellite. The investigator evidently refused to give him his email address. Wow, what an investigator. When you have people like that, and people who act like they're trying to hide something, no wonder there are so many CTers...

[Gummug]

skyeagle409, on 15 February 2013 - 07:32 PM, said:

I wouldn't trust that video because It is full of disinformation and misinformation and is as worthless as an $8.00 bill. There have been claims that this photo was proof that thermite brought down the WTC buildings.




Apparently, 911 conspiracist were unaware that clean-up crews cut the steel column.




Just another case where 911 conspiracist had turned something as mundane as a clean-up operation into an unfounded conspiracy.

OK, I'm willing to accept that the bottom photos were cuts done by clean-up crews. That seems fairly evident and acceptable. I think, however, that that is a separate issue from the video under discussion...
Also, if you watch the whole video, he mentions using thermate (a mixture of thermite, barium nitrate and sulfur), not thermite.
eta: because nano-thermite was not available. Also, what does it mean that the mythbuster's website said the 9/11 theories will not be allowed to be debated or discussed? Do they mean mythbusters are not allowing it, or the government is not allowing mythbusters to discuss or debate it?

Edited by Gummug, 16 February 2013 - 03:32 AM.

[skyeagle409]

Little Fish, on 15 February 2013 - 11:14 PM, said:

in your opinion, can thermite cut through steel beams horizontally?

Depends what kind of a beam. Let's take a look.



Note that 175 pounds of  thermite did not damage the steel column and did not leave behind molten steel. I don't think 911 conspiracist understand that thermite was not capable of bringing down the WTC buildings, another hint why thermite is not widely used by the demolition industry for demolition implosions.

The WTC buildings remained standing despite the fact they were struck by B-767s, but the demise of the WTC buildings began when they began to buckle due to fires. The stage for the collapse was set when the buildings began to buckle.

[skyeagle409]

Gummug, on 16 February 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

OK, I'm willing to accept that the bottom photos were cuts done by clean-up crews. That seems fairly evident and acceptable. I think, however, that that is a separate issue from the video under discussion...
Also, if you watch the whole video, he mentions using thermate (a mixture of thermite, barium nitrate and sulfur), not thermite.

Thermate is also incapable of bringing down the WTC buildings. RDX, which is used by the demolition industry, is also incapable of bringing down the WTC buildings and why the use of RDX for demolition implosion requires structural pre-weakening and the use of explosives such as dynamite, otherwise, the building will remain standing because structural loads will be redistributed as was the case when the two B-767s struck WTC1 and WTC2.

Conspiracist got the wrong idea that placing thermite on the steel columns will bring down the WTC buildings, but that is definitely not the case and would not have happened especially when both buildings suffered serious impact damage as was the case with WTC7 and yet they remained standing.

The process to prepare of building for demolition implosion is a long process that involves many people  and a range of specialties, which requires many months to complete. Conspiracist need to get out that Hollywood mentality because much of what is produced in Hollywood is fictional. A case in point, the movie; "Interceptor" did not depict the KC-10, C-5 in accurate details nor events in the air force as accurate and yet people thought that is how things were.

The same can be said when conspiracy websites present highly flawed conspiracy videos on the Internet. I've reviewed many of those videos and was amazed how easily people were duped by flawed and inaccurate information, disinformation and just plain outright lies presented by those videos, especially those relating to aircraft, ACARS, transponders and radar technology, which explains why many conspiracist were duped by that hoaxed video of WTC7.

Edited by skyeagle409, 16 February 2013 - 04:08 AM.

[Gummug]

Skyeagle I know you have referenced the Windsor fire in Spain. Here's a short video (don't worry, it's less than a minute long) of that fire:

That doesn't look anything like the fire in WTC7. To be honest, I can't even SEE the fire in WTC7.

[Gummug]

Even controlled demolitions don't always work, but all the fires worked perfectly:

[skyeagle409]

Gummug, on 16 February 2013 - 03:06 AM, said:

At the very end of this video, one man says he was going to ask the investigator for his email address so he could send him thermal images from the satellite. The investigator evidently refused to give him his email address. Wow, what an investigator. When you have people like that, and people who act like they're trying to hide something, no wonder there are so many CTers...

Perhaps, he was looking for these images.

[skyeagle409]

Gummug, on 16 February 2013 - 04:12 AM, said:

Even controlled demolitions don't always work, but all the fires worked perfectly:

You have to understand the process of demolition implosions. If the job of pre-weakening and placement of explosives is not properly done, the result can be an unsuccessful demolition operation.

Edited by skyeagle409, 16 February 2013 - 04:26 AM.

[skyeagle409]

Gummug, on 16 February 2013 - 03:55 AM, said:

Skyeagle I know you have referenced the Windsor fire in Spain. Here's a short video (don't worry, it's less than a minute long) of that fire:

That doesn't look anything like the fire in WTC7. To be honest, I can't even SEE the fire in WTC7.

That was the Windsor building on fire. The upper steel structure completely collapsed due to the fire, leaving only the concrete core standing. You might want to review this on WTC7.

Quote

Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.

http://www.firehouse...e/gz/boyle.html

http://www.911myths....tc7_damage.html

Edited by skyeagle409, 16 February 2013 - 04:24 AM.