TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:
they are only outrageous to someone who doesn't understand certain 'atmospheres' and MO's of particulur groups/individuals. I haven't even scatched the surface.
You haven't scratched the surface because you've brought nothing to the table except for accusations. You can accuse all day if you want. You can accuse until you're blue in the face.
Until you bring some substantial evidence to the table, it will just be meaningless babble.
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:
Do you have any questions regarding 9/11?
As in, questions that you can answer? Not really no.
Or do you mean, do I think that there are unanswered questions about certain details of that day? Sure. There will always be unanswered questions.
Am I satisfied with the amount of investigation that was done? Yes, as a matter of fact I am. Not only the official investigation, but also all of the diligent work that has followed that in answer to baseless truther claims.
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 06:41 PM, said:
Ignorance is bliss

So are you ever going to inform any of us about whatever it is that you claim you know and back it up with something verifiable?
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 06:45 PM, said:
The most outrageous thing about 9/11 is that after watching 3,000 of their fellow Americans being savagely murdered and the ones who are screaming for a thorough and complete investigation are criticised more heavily than the perps. It is truly outrageous.
You can scream all that you want, a thorough investigation has already been done. Could it have been more thorough? Sure, there is always room for improvement. That is true no matter what you do. You aren't just screaming about additional investigations though. You are accusing people of some pretty outrageous things and bringing nothing at all to back it up. Is there an echo in here? I seem to keep saying that...
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 06:45 PM, said:
I don't know how anyone believes the official investigation was thorough or adequate. Even those on the 9/11 Commission do not believe so.
And I don't know how people come up with their baseless claims about what they think happened. Nor do I understand why they continue to cling to them even after completely reasonable explanations and answers have been provided.
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 07:49 PM, said:
3,000 murdered and all you are worried about is money? DISGUSTING.......
I'm not as concerned about money as I am about the reasoning for this new investigation in the first place. None of the claims of the 9/11 truth movement have withstood scrutiny. In order to justify the expense of such a thing, we need more than tantrums and appeals to emotion. We need some real verifiable reasons to conclude that we don't already have adequate answers to the questions posed.
TrueBeliever, on 19 October 2012 - 08:11 PM, said:
how do you know another investigation will not change the 'official' story?
Any changes would likely be minor. Regardless of what you may think, the investigations that have been done have been pretty thorough. There is room for improvement, yes, but as mentioned before; this will always be the case.
The bottom line here is that the truth movement has utterly failed to make its case.