Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#8821    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:31 AM

problem here zoser.. your still not offering any proof to the claims you make.. what your showing is the finished product.. nothing to how it was made.. how it was done.. the tools used..

so.. again.. you need to show proof before you can call it fact.


#8822    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:33 AM

to be honest.. I think all AA'ers should go into politics ..

they are very good at avoiding direct questions.. giving factual examples etc..

reading the stuff you post on here zoser and how you duck and weave.. reminds me of watching parliament question time..


#8823    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:35 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:

problem here zoser.. your still not offering any proof to the claims you make.. what your showing is the finished product.. nothing to how it was made.. how it was done.. the tools used..

so.. again.. you need to show proof before you can call it fact.

Morning Dingo.

(or evening in Aus).

The problem is that no primitive system of drilling is going to drill those holes and leave behind that evidence.

Just like I have been saying.

The evidence fits ultra sonics.

I have the evidence.

Posted Image


#8824    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Mainly Spherical in Shape

  • Member
  • 25,060 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:18 AM, said:

See above post on drilling please.

Random unsubstantiated claims will not do.
I don't think you really understand. Random unsubstantiated claims will not do, you say. Don't you understand that insisting that ETs must have done it is a Random unsubstantiated claim? Do you understand that, or do you have difficulty understanding that? You do realise that there's nothing to substantiate the claim that ETs must have done it?

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#8825    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:37 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:35 AM, said:

Morning Dingo.

(or evening in Aus).

The problem is that no primitive system of drilling is going to drill those holes and leave behind that evidence.

Just like I have been saying.

The evidence fits ultra sonics.

I have the evidence.

no you dont have the evidence zoser.. the evidence would be a example of the tool used.. no matter how you try to twist it.. use warped logic.. its not evidence..

we have posted tools you say are not good enough.. it is up to you to prove that they are not.. basically the same that you ask us to do.. it also applies to you as well..

and evening mate.. sorry been busy packing today.. moving to queensland in a month ..


#8826    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:37 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

to be honest.. I think all AA'ers should go into politics ..

they are very good at avoiding direct questions.. giving factual examples etc..

reading the stuff you post on here zoser and how you duck and weave.. reminds me of watching parliament question time..

Ducking and weaving how?

I am submitting evidence of ancient high technology.

Straight cuts, holes, precision fitting, vitrification and moulding.

It's all in the stones.

I have stuck to the subject.

Posted Image


#8827    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:41 AM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 12 March 2013 - 10:36 AM, said:

I don't think you really understand. Random unsubstantiated claims will not do, you say. Don't you understand that insisting that ETs must have done it is a Random unsubstantiated claim? Do you understand that, or do you have difficulty understanding that? You do realise that there's nothing to substantiate the claim that ETs must have done it?

Very easy.  Primitive man couldn't do it.  It was all done by unknown high technology although the evidence is now pointing to sound as the method.  

The ancients spoke of visitors.  They portrayed this in their art and their folkore.

I've said it before but we don't need spaceships in the sand.

If you think otherwise then please explain 0.1 inch depth cuts in granite per revolution.

If you say ancient high tech visitors didn't do it than you have to say who did.

Simple.

Posted Image


#8828    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:42 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:

Ducking and weaving how?

I am submitting evidence of ancient high technology.

Straight cuts, holes, precision fitting, vitrification and moulding.

It's all in the stones.

I have stuck to the subject.

no.. what you have submitted is pictures saying it was done by this.. without showing how..

its like this..

you want to get a gov grant to polish granite using hi tech gear..

you can just go.. here is the stone.. see this is what it looks like with our ancient alien tech..

nope.. you have to actually prove that the gear works.. show the equipment.. show data.. practical demonstrations.. that kind of thing..

and you are failing each and every time to do that.. that is a duck and weave.. when we ask for proof you cant give it.. when you ask us for it.. we can.. see where I am getting at here ?

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

Very easy.  Primitive man couldn't do it.  It was all done by unknown high technology although the evidence is now pointing to sound as the method.  

The ancients spoke of visitors.  They portrayed this in their art and their folkore.

I've said it before but we don't need spaceships in the sand.

If you think otherwise then please explain 0.1 inch depth cuts in granite per revolution.

If you say ancient high tech visitors didn't do it than you have to say who did.

Simple.

the ancients did it.. using the same tools they always used..

simple..


#8829    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:44 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:

no you dont have the evidence zoser.. the evidence would be a example of the tool used.. no matter how you try to twist it.. use warped logic.. its not evidence..

we have posted tools you say are not good enough.. it is up to you to prove that they are not.. basically the same that you ask us to do.. it also applies to you as well..

and evening mate.. sorry been busy packing today.. moving to queensland in a month ..

Queensland.  Very nice.  Sub tropical climate?

The tools are not with us but the evidence of what did it is.

See previous post.

http://www.unexplain...05#entry4695850

We now have vitrification, moulding, precision saw cuts, precision hole cuts with inexplicable feed rates, and precision fitting even fusion of blocks.

Looks pretty convincing to me.

If not high tech visitors then who?

Posted Image


#8830    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Mainly Spherical in Shape

  • Member
  • 25,060 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:45 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

Very easy.  Primitive man couldn't do it.  It was all done by unknown high technology although the evidence is now pointing to sound as the method.  

The ancients spoke of visitors.  They portrayed this in their art and their folkore.

I've said it before but we don't need spaceships in the sand.

If you think otherwise then please explain 0.1 inch depth cuts in granite per revolution.

If you say ancient high tech visitors didn't do it than you have to say who did.

Simple.
No, i'm afraid that's the "you prove it's not" argument, which isn't a legitimate argument I'm afraid. It's up to people who insist that it must have been something to prove that it was that something, not for others to prove that it wasn't. I'm really sorry about this. :-)

Edited by Lord Vetinari, 12 March 2013 - 10:45 AM.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#8831    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:45 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:42 AM, said:


no.. what you have submitted is pictures saying it was done by this.. without showing how..

its like this..

you want to get a gov grant to polish granite using hi tech gear..

you can just go.. here is the stone.. see this is what it looks like with our ancient alien tech..

nope.. you have to actually prove that the gear works.. show the equipment.. show data.. practical demonstrations.. that kind of thing..

and you are failing each and every time to do that.. that is a duck and weave.. when we ask for proof you cant give it.. when you ask us for it.. we can.. see where I am getting at here ?



the ancients did it.. using the same tools they always used..

simple..

The evidence says that they couldn't have without high technology.

The explanation for the feed rate?

Posted Image


#8832    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:46 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:44 AM, said:

Queensland.  Very nice.  Sub tropical climate?

The tools are not with us but the evidence of what did it is.

See previous post.

http://www.unexplain...05#entry4695850

We now have vitrification, moulding, precision saw cuts, precision hole cuts with inexplicable feed rates, and precision fitting even fusion of blocks.

Looks pretty convincing to me.

If not high tech visitors then who?

love it over in queensland :)

Ok lets see what we have..

The tools are with us and the evidence of what did it is.

We now have vitrification precision saw cuts, precision hole cuts with inexplicable feed rates, and precision fitting even fusion of blocks.

Looks pretty convincing to me.

If not our ancient ancestors then who?

yup.. that is all evidence that ancient man did it with now help from a advanced race at all..


#8833    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,103 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:48 AM

View Postzoser, on 12 March 2013 - 10:45 AM, said:

The evidence says that they couldn't have without high technology.

The explanation for the feed rate?

what evidence?

your putting modern day drilling methods into ancient drilling tech..

it wont mix..

yes we can drill 50 meters into hard granite in about 25 mins using modern day tech..

the ancients did it a lot slower.. but you will still have the same effect..

what your saying does not wash at all..

the evidence you put up to say advanced high tech.. is really evidence of it being done with low tech..


#8834    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:50 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:46 AM, said:

love it over in queensland :)

Ok lets see what we have..

The tools are with us and the evidence of what did it is.

We now have vitrification precision saw cuts, precision hole cuts with inexplicable feed rates, and precision fitting even fusion of blocks.

Looks pretty convincing to me.

If not our ancient ancestors then who?

yup.. that is all evidence that ancient man did it with now help from a advanced race at all..

Proof by trace evidence.

There is no other argument.

Did the ancients have high speed rotary cutters?

No.

Then the other alternative has to be high weight bearing down on the tool.  It would need to be in the order of say 0.5 tonne - 1 tonne, with the obvious result that a copper tube would collapse instantly it hit the granite.

It wouldn't even do 1 rev.

No material hard enough to stand the load.

I cannot see how this one can be argued otherwise.

Hypothesis proved.

Posted Image


#8835    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 12 March 2013 - 10:52 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 12 March 2013 - 10:48 AM, said:


what evidence?

your putting modern day drilling methods into ancient drilling tech..

it wont mix..

yes we can drill 50 meters into hard granite in about 25 mins using modern day tech..

the ancients did it a lot slower.. but you will still have the same effect..

what your saying does not wash at all..

the evidence you put up to say advanced high tech.. is really evidence of it being done with low tech..

Your missing the trace evidence.

Think about it.

0.1 inch of depth per revolution.  That's 2.5mm in granite.

Posted Image