Ra, I have no idea where you got the idea that I'd suddenly 'become' a skeptic.
It's not something that just happens one fine morning where you wake up, greet the sun and say "Today, I am a skeptic."
It takes years of exposure to, in particular, those believers who seem to think that by virtue of possessing an empty head, they somehow are more open-minded than the general population (who incidently seem to, themsleves/emptyheads, make up what constitutes as ufology/paranormalia's general population).
The sad truth is that an empty head doesn't equate to an open mind, it just means there's a hell of a lot more space in the attic to clutter up with useless junk.
Which usually comes tumbling out in a big ol' mess whenever the subject of ufooz'n'graliens comes up. And it generally ends with reference to some kind of audio-visual media, that if I'd just watch, would change my life in x number of minutes. Interestingly I've heard similar claims from Time-Share salesmen and door-to-door missionaries...
As for Bragalia, I'm well aware of his work. Suffice to say as entertaining as his articles are, he really doesn't provide much by way of proof. Particularly when mentioning pictures and paintings, done by famous photographers, that have conveniently gone missing many years ago. Yes, the sad truth is Bragalia is just another guy with extraordinary claims and no actual proof -
"A year long effort was made by this author to locate Battelle's First and Second Progress Reports on memory metal. Though footnotes have been located to the reports in military sponsored studies on memory metal, access to the actual reports remains impossible."
How convinient. I wonder how the studies from 1939 - 1947, into titanium nickel alloys fit into this then? Obviously, for the sake of Bragalia's story, they don't. Start at wikipedia
Link
And follow the bouncing ball from there. Luckily I was researching something sort of related, so I won't ask for the 2 hours of my life back, but instead of doing whatever it is that usually leads you to youtube and here, perhaps you might like to try something different for a change
As for what I wrote, I didn't write it, I was merely quoting from a 30 year old flying saucer magazine, a good point made by one of its readers. So no mistakes made by me.
He does make a good point that all this aliens and spaceships stuff is entirely based on how we humans would go about travelling into space with the aid of our machines.
What's to say that a spacefaring race of ET explorers even has need for what we'd consider a physical form, if they had advanced their technology so far as to no longer be bound by the laws of reality?
Given that it is a valid point that lightspeed is still too slow to make intergalactic travel feasible or viable, without totally abandoning your home planet and resources.
Of course the counter argument well always be advanced tech=prolonged lifespans=generational space travel (as long as they've discovered the secret to free energy). But then what's the point? A spaceship can only carry a finite amount of crew, supplies and resources, no matter how 'advanced' you are. And if you're that advanced that you're creating something out of nothing, why would you be dependent on physical technology then?
Edited by Evangium, 07 August 2009 - 03:21 PM.