Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
Attaturk guaranteed to conserve benefits of imperialists, deported all members of Ottoman, built up his domination, and created the country named Turkey. Attaturk was one of supporters of imperialism and after he won turkish war of independence, he applied the rules of imperialists, in line with benefits of imperialist western civilization, under cover of revolution, he changed his country's alphabet, clothes..and so on and under name of modern turkey he created a freak of nature.
What would have been your alternative Turkey? After all, most Turks want to be part of the "imperialist" EU.
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
Whenas israel and egypt never were rival countries) and until 80s Iran) just aimed at something: It is blocking that Soviets reach mediterranean sea and oil sources of arabs. After split of Soviet Union Turkey and Israel lost their important roles. Today, Kissinger said about Israel: "In 10 years, there will be no more Israel" and a whole lot of western sources mention that Turkey borders will be changed anymore.
Well Israel didn't even exist until the end of WWII and Egypt were against the creation of Israel from the start. They only accepted it's existence after Camp David. Turkey and Israel lost their important roles? I don't think so. Have you got a source where it's says Turkey's borders will change?
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
In fact by imperialist landlords Turkey was founded as a country against The Soviet Union.
It was the Ottoman's Empire "imperialistic" ambitions that caused them to side with the Germans and the Asburghs during WWI. They lost and Turkey was created. Turks can only blame themselves.
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
Today, global dominant powers exploit Syrian civil war to change Turkey’s borders and they encourage Turkey to enter the war in Syria.
If Turkey fights with Syria, they plan that borders of Turkey bound again at end of regional war, but if Turkey does not fight with Syria, this time President Erdogan will lose his power, I think this condition makes it all the more weird.
I was under the impression western powers wanted to stay out of the civil war in Syria? My gut feeling but probably because there's no oil there. So I'm not sure anyone's trying to exploit anything there.
I was also under the impression that Turks may have been pleased to receive the "extra protection" from NATO?
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
Because nineties of Turkey were planned as a transition period to the big middle east project and in 2000s Erdogan and his party were put into power for imperialists’ the big middle east project (libya, syria, iran operations..and so on).
Really, Turks want to be part of the ME, instead of Europe??! It's going to be hard to convince anyone of this.
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
Back in the day, if Turkey had been a socialist state, Turkey would have joined The Soviet Union.
If only we joined Soviet Union , everything would be very different. But unfortunately because of imperialists and their fascist collaborators we lost this opportunity and today sadly we became a country of ignorant religionists and nationalists, came out as a poor quality country that is lackey of USA and NATO.
I suppose having commie ideals is ones choice but you've got to be realistic as well. Look at what happened to the Soviet Union. Look at how China has ended up and what the hypocrates at the head of the Communist Party are doing? Look at how malnourished the North Korean population is?
Muzzybluezzy, on 07 December 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:
In short; the fate of my country was really ****ed up!
that's about it!
It will be ****ed up if it doesn't join the EU. The ME or becoming a Communist regime isn't the answer IMO.
Edited by BlackRedLittleDevil, 07 December 2012 - 11:39 PM.