karl 12 Posted February 1, 2009 #1 Share Posted February 1, 2009 NASA photograph pyramid on moon. Image found at 6:53. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw Apollo 17 NASA Lunar photograph AS17-136-20680 which purportedly shows a sunstruck over-exposed frame has now been reexamined with new contrasting techniques and appears to show a pyramid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isis-999 Posted February 1, 2009 #2 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I've seen this before i just don't think it's anything made by aliens in fact it looks like a natural land mark to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertoIlias Posted February 1, 2009 #3 Share Posted February 1, 2009 wow thats fuzzy. Probably nothing at all. Its to perfect to be a natural land formation though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimly Posted February 1, 2009 #4 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Looks like somebody crumpled the photo up and set it on fire? I can't make anything out of that. Potentially sort of interesting to see straight lines in a picture of the moon's surface, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czero 101 Posted February 1, 2009 #5 Share Posted February 1, 2009 NASA photograph pyramid on moon. Image found at 6:53. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw Apollo 17 NASA Lunar photograph AS17-136-20680 which purportedly shows a sunstruck over-exposed frame has now been reexamined with new contrasting techniques and appears to show a pyramid. Typical case of conspiracy theorists cherry picking one picture out of literally thousands, ascribing their own delusions to it, then manipulating the image until what they want to be there shows up. First things first. The photo number is wrong. The image shown is actually AS17-135-20680. If you can't even get the number right, what else about your theory is wrong...? Secondly, did you or the "YouTube researcher" (note the use of the oxymoron here) look at any of the photos before this one? I'm guessing not... http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20679.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20678.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20677.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20676.jpg What we have here is a series of pictures taken at the end of roll 135 before it was changed out and a different film magazine attached to the camera. Both 20679 and 20680 are listed as "sunstruck" which means that sunlight go into magazine 135 and "struck" those two frames of film. Note that 20680 is completely washed out, and 20679 is only partially washed out, since it would have been mostly on the take-up roller inside the film magazine. So, as usual, no mystery here, except of course, why some people are gullible enough to fall for this kind of claptrap and why some others are deluded enough to make this crap up and claim it to be "legitimate research". "Moon pyramid" indeed... Cz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted February 1, 2009 #6 Share Posted February 1, 2009 "Reexamined with new contrasting techniques" .... KS15, is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted February 1, 2009 #7 Share Posted February 1, 2009 http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw Thanks for that.... Interestingly...the angle of the base/slope of the 'Moon Pyramid' appears (as near as dammit, I've just checked with a protractor) to be the same as the Great Pyramid at Giza. Mmmmmmmm. Secondly, did you or the "YouTube researcher" (note the use of the oxymoron here) I seem to remember that 3 days ago you were rather impressed with a certain YouTube video and described it as 'Awesome'. look at any of the photos before this one? I'm guessing not... http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20679.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20678.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20677.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20676.jpg If you are trying to imply that the 'pyramid' in the OP pictures was one of the above pictures, washed out/sunstruck..? I've just looked and there aren't any angles that correspond to the 'Moon Pyramid'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUCKUS Posted February 1, 2009 #8 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The image below was taken by the lunar orbiter and can be found at the address below. This is from Arizona State University Space Exploration Resources pages. This location is roughly 1/4 of the page up from the bottom of the image you have to search the image but you can find it. UAZ A few odd looking formations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czero 101 Posted February 1, 2009 #9 Share Posted February 1, 2009 If you are trying to imply that the 'pyramid' in the OP pictures was one of the above pictures, washed out/sunstruck..? I've just looked and there aren't any angles that correspond to the 'Moon Pyramid'. Perhaps you missed this, Bee: The photo number is wrong. The image shown is actually AS17-135-20680. ... http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680.jpg So no, I'm not implying anything... I'm coming right out and stating it as a fact. Link to the high resolution version of the above image: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680HR.jpg Cz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KS15 Posted February 1, 2009 #10 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Hello all. I decided to take a look at this image. First, As I keep saying over and over, I work with original image detail. Either the information is there or it is not. I do not change the details of an image…..I do not create images….Only reveal what is original to the image….. All images are a superposition of multiple frequencies (colors), light intensities, and noise….The goal is to selectively filter these colors. depending on the filtering, various levels of image detail can be revealed. It takes experimenting….. The image itself is horribly over-exposed….But I was able to make out this pyramid shape….even if slightly… http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...35-20680KS1.jpg http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...5-20680KS31.jpg http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...5-20680KS41.jpg I can not say if this a natural or artificial structure. I can say this is not apart of the spacecraft…but apart of the lunar landscape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUCKUS Posted February 1, 2009 #11 Share Posted February 1, 2009 You can still see the the Lunar surface through the shape it looks like a shadow to me or a double exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KS15 Posted February 1, 2009 #12 Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) Hello karl12. I have found one intriguing item of this pyramid.. This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm Edited February 1, 2009 by KS15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted February 1, 2009 #13 Share Posted February 1, 2009 This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry………Hmmmmmmm I know I did a mmmmmmmmm earlier in the thread.....(I will explain it, if anyone dares to ask) But could you say a bit more about what your mmmmmmmmm means... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KS15 Posted February 1, 2009 #14 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I know I did a mmmmmmmmm earlier in the thread.....(I will explain it, if anyone dares to ask) But could you say a bit more about what your mmmmmmmmm means... Artificial or "not of a natural origin".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbrahamVanHelsing Posted February 1, 2009 #15 Share Posted February 1, 2009 That looks like a regular rock formation to me, a rocky peak of some description I'd say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skeptic Eric Raven Posted February 1, 2009 #16 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Why is there such a desperation to find something in nothing? I will never understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzard Posted February 1, 2009 #17 Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm Pixel? In digital imaging, a pixel (or picture element) is the smallest item of information in an image. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixels Edited February 1, 2009 by hazzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted February 1, 2009 #18 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Artificial or "not of a natural origin".... Ah ha!! Mmmmmmmmmmm maybe the ancient egyptians did have a presence/base on the moon then.... How exciting!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimly Posted February 1, 2009 #19 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Ah ha!! Mmmmmmmmmmm maybe the ancient egyptians did have a presence/base on the moon then.... How exciting!!!!!!!!! Or maybe... both Egypt and the moon were populated with time-traveling leprechaun vampires! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starchy Posted February 1, 2009 #20 Share Posted February 1, 2009 This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm Good spot KS15, could it be made of blocks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KS15 Posted February 1, 2009 #21 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Pixel? In digital imaging, a pixel (or picture element) is the smallest item of information in an image. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixels NO....It is a shape consisting of many pixels.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KS15 Posted February 1, 2009 #22 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Hello all. “Why is there such a desperation to find something in nothing? I will never understand.” I am a casual observer…This image shows a block with flat surfaces and right angle geometry.... A link to the Apollo 17 images…both B&W (grayscale) and color……I will be looking at these images….especially the color images…need some work… http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/ An example.. Original as posted on the website..Blah… Better….Tried to enhance the colors of the Moons surface…. I will be working with the smaller images. The high resolution images are misleading….both small and large images are 300 pixels per inch resolution. Their larger images are NOISY….difficult to work with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted February 1, 2009 #23 Share Posted February 1, 2009 [...] I will be working with the smaller images. The high resolution images are misleading….both small and large images are 300 pixels per inch resolution. Their larger images are NOISY….difficult to work with. Oh man, its priceless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombi Posted February 1, 2009 #24 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Even if it is a Pyramid on the moon, what's the point of it"?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted February 1, 2009 #25 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Even if it is a Pyramid on the moon, what's the point of it"?! The bit at the very top? But, on a more serious note.... the same point as the Giza Pyramid, I surpose....which is all very mysterious and a hotly debated deep subject. ( I don't think it's a tomb). Just to throw an idea in....perhaps the pyramid facilitates inter-dimensional travel from pyramid to pyramid...which could be very handy when going from the earth to the moon and back.....or to other pyramids situated in other places. (like Cydonia, Mars for example.. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now