Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

NASA photograph pyramid on moon.


karl 12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 968
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bee

    118

  • mcrom901

    106

  • badeskov

    70

  • Czero 101

    53

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've seen this before i just don't think it's anything made by aliens in fact it looks like a natural land mark to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like somebody crumpled the photo up and set it on fire? I can't make anything out of that. Potentially sort of interesting to see straight lines in a picture of the moon's surface, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NASA photograph pyramid on moon.

Image found at 6:53.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw

Apollo 17 NASA Lunar photograph AS17-136-20680 which purportedly shows a sunstruck over-exposed frame has now been reexamined with new contrasting techniques and appears to show a pyramid.

linked-image

Typical case of conspiracy theorists cherry picking one picture out of literally thousands, ascribing their own delusions to it, then manipulating the image until what they want to be there shows up.

First things first.

The photo number is wrong. The image shown is actually AS17-135-20680. If you can't even get the number right, what else about your theory is wrong...?

Secondly, did you or the "YouTube researcher" (note the use of the oxymoron here) look at any of the photos before this one? I'm guessing not...

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680.jpg

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20679.jpg

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20678.jpg

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20677.jpg

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20676.jpg

What we have here is a series of pictures taken at the end of roll 135 before it was changed out and a different film magazine attached to the camera. Both 20679 and 20680 are listed as "sunstruck" which means that sunlight go into magazine 135 and "struck" those two frames of film. Note that 20680 is completely washed out, and 20679 is only partially washed out, since it would have been mostly on the take-up roller inside the film magazine.

So, as usual, no mystery here, except of course, why some people are gullible enough to fall for this kind of claptrap and why some others are deluded enough to make this crap up and claim it to be "legitimate research".

"Moon pyramid" indeed... :rolleyes:

Cz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Reexamined with new contrasting techniques" ....

KS15, is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.... :yes:

Interestingly...the angle of the base/slope of the 'Moon Pyramid' appears (as near as dammit, I've just

checked with a protractor) to be the same as the Great Pyramid at Giza.

Mmmmmmmm.

Secondly, did you or the "YouTube researcher" (note the use of the oxymoron here)

I seem to remember that 3 days ago you were rather impressed with a certain YouTube video

and described it as 'Awesome'.

If you are trying to imply that the 'pyramid' in the OP pictures was one of the above pictures, washed out/sunstruck..?

I've just looked and there aren't any angles that correspond to the 'Moon Pyramid'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The image below was taken by the lunar orbiter and can be found at the address below. This is from Arizona State University Space Exploration Resources pages.

This location is roughly 1/4 of the page up from the bottom of the image you have to search the image but you can find it.

UAZ

A few odd looking formations

linked-image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are trying to imply that the 'pyramid' in the OP pictures was one of the above pictures, washed out/sunstruck..?

I've just looked and there aren't any angles that correspond to the 'Moon Pyramid'.

Perhaps you missed this, Bee:

The photo number is wrong. The image shown is actually AS17-135-20680.

...

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680.jpg

So no, I'm not implying anything... I'm coming right out and stating it as a fact.

Link to the high resolution version of the above image:

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680HR.jpg

Cz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all.

I decided to take a look at this image.

First, As I keep saying over and over, I work with original image detail. Either the information is there or it is not.

I do not change the details of an image…..I do not create images….Only reveal what is original to the image…..

All images are a superposition of multiple frequencies (colors), light intensities, and noise….The goal is to selectively filter these colors. depending on the filtering, various levels of image detail can be revealed. It takes experimenting…..

The image itself is horribly over-exposed….But I was able to make out this pyramid shape….even if slightly…

linked-image

http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...35-20680KS1.jpg

linked-image

http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...5-20680KS31.jpg

linked-image

http://rex-heflin-ufo-analysis.com/slide_s...5-20680KS41.jpg

I can not say if this a natural or artificial structure. I can say this is not apart of the spacecraft…but apart of the lunar landscape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can still see the the Lunar surface through the shape it looks like a shadow to me or a double exposure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello karl12.

I have found one intriguing item of this pyramid..

linked-image

This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm

Edited by KS15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry………Hmmmmmmm

I know I did a mmmmmmmmm earlier in the thread.....(I will explain it, if anyone dares to ask)

But could you say a bit more about what your mmmmmmmmm means...

:tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I did a mmmmmmmmm earlier in the thread.....(I will explain it, if anyone dares to ask)

But could you say a bit more about what your mmmmmmmmm means...

:tu:

Artificial or "not of a natural origin".... :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks like a regular rock formation to me, a rocky peak of some description I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is there such a desperation to find something in nothing? I will never understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm

Pixel?

In digital imaging, a pixel (or picture element) is the smallest item of information in an image.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixels

Edited by hazzard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artificial or "not of a natural origin".... :o

Ah ha!!

Mmmmmmmmmmm :) maybe the ancient egyptians did have a presence/base on the moon then.... :o

How exciting!!!!!!!!!

:D:yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ha!!

Mmmmmmmmmmm :) maybe the ancient egyptians did have a presence/base on the moon then.... :o

How exciting!!!!!!!!!

:D:yes:

Or maybe... both Egypt and the moon were populated with time-traveling leprechaun vampires!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This object shows flat surfaces and right angle geometry.........Hmmmmmmm

Good spot KS15, could it be made of blocks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all.

“Why is there such a desperation to find something in nothing? I will never understand.”

I am a casual observer…This image shows a block with flat surfaces and right angle geometry....

linked-image

A link to the Apollo 17 images…both B&W (grayscale) and color……I will be looking at these images….especially the color images…need some work…

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/

An example..

Original as posted on the website..Blah…

linked-image

Better….Tried to enhance the colors of the Moons surface….

linked-image

I will be working with the smaller images. The high resolution images are misleading….both small and large images are 300 pixels per inch resolution. Their larger images are NOISY….difficult to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[...]

I will be working with the smaller images. The high resolution images are misleading….both small and large images are 300 pixels per inch resolution. Their larger images are NOISY….difficult to work with.

:lol:

Oh man, its priceless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if it is a Pyramid on the moon, what's the point of it"?!

The bit at the very top? ^_^

But, on a more serious note.... :P the same point as the Giza Pyramid, I surpose....which is all

very mysterious and a hotly debated deep subject. ( I don't think it's a tomb).

Just to throw an idea in....perhaps the pyramid facilitates inter-dimensional travel from

pyramid to pyramid...which could be very handy when going from the earth to the moon and

back.....or to other pyramids situated in other places. (like Cydonia, Mars for example.. :o )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.