synchronomy, on 10 October 2012 - 06:27 PM, said:
Interesting.
I have often wondered what life would be like today if we had never been plagued by warfare, but had always resolved conflict through diplomatic means.
Or, what about if disease was non-existant, and never had been?
How would this change the way we are today?
For one thing, there would be a helluva lot more people around I think.
Well, one of the worlds biggest problems right now is overpopulation. The resources simply aren't there to provide a good quality of life to everyone out there. Disease is a result of this, I think of it as a part of the natural order.
Disease strikes where there is high amounts of squalor, most likely as a result of having more mouths than you can feed.
I also think two sides of the argument must be experienced when you mention warfare and diplomatic means before making a decision. Obviously, as we see it now, war is not a logical means of solving any problem right now. Though maybe thousands of years ago that thought would simply not have been considered.
Even though we have gone through all these population hindering phases, we still have this problem of overpopulation. Maybe if there wasn't war it could had led to more open minded thinking, I believe violence is a negative trait to a human being and has hindered in decision making that could have led to a better world.
These days everyone wants a car, their own house etc. Something earth can't support for the current population. Something needs to be done and I think something will be.