Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

WTC 911 EyeWitness~Hoboken


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3683 replies to this topic

#346    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 12:38 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 12:23 AM, said:

Weakness of my claims? haahaha!! That Blanchard hasn't demolished a building? There is nothing on the Protec website that says they or Brent do demolitions.

LOL!! I have been in touch with demolition experts and his companies via emails which have confirmed that Brent Blanchard has been involved in many demolitions with well over 20 years experience and look what you posted :yes:

I told you to check because I had already done so,  but you failed to do so and the rest is now history.  :w00t:  BTW, the demolition process involves many people, so is it any wonder why I have stated that claims of 911 conspiracist are based on pure ignorance?

I have conveyed the message to you that demolition experts around the world look up to Brent Blanchard for advice and detailed information on demolitions, but unfortunately, you failed to place the pieces of the puzzle in their proper places. :no: You don't become one of the world's top demolition experts by watching TV or reading articles on the Internet; you have to have many years of experience to become a world leader in demolition implosions.

What do you do when you feel there is more information that cannot be found on the Internet? I've learned to contact people and companies over the years when I want to find out more about a particular story and I even invited you to do the same but you failed to do so. You didn't even understand the significance of what I have been conveying, especially in regards to Brent Blanchard and implosion.com.

You know the old story; "You reap what you sow."

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 01:35 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#347    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:29 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 12:27 AM, said:

Nope!! Science and common sense have already proven my case. :yes:



How amusing!! Now, for my admission. I have been in touch with demolition experts and his company, and they have confirmed that Brent Blanchard has personally been involved in demolition implosions. How many buildings demolition did they confirm for Brent  Blanchard?

A. 1 demolition

B. 100 demolitions

C. 500 demolitions

D. Well over 1 thousand

Answer: D.

Now, you know one reason why Brent Blanchard is one of the top demolition experts in the whole world! :yes:
Evidence of this?? lol

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#348    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:37 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 01:29 AM, said:

Evidence of this?? lol

Apparently, you didn't understand a word as far as my contacts are concerned. You see, it is like this, I am not afraid to use emails and the telephone to ascertain the rest of the story. What did I invite you to do the other day as far as using the telephone?

I know from experience that not everything can be found on the Internet.

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 01:43 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#349    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:46 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 01:37 AM, said:

Apparently, you didn't understand a word as far as my contacts are concerned. You see, it is like this, I am not afraid to use emails and the telephone to ascertain the rest of the story.
Not sure what you are on about here?? :blink:

Protec are a documentation company, maybe the worlds best demolition documentation company, but they do not perform demolitions.

When you find evidence of this thousands of demolitions Protec/Blanchard have performed, then let me and the forum know.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#350    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:49 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 01:46 AM, said:

Not sure what you are on about here?? :blink:

Protec are a documentation company, maybe the worlds best demolition documentation company, but they do not perform demolitions.

When you find evidence of this thousands of demolitions Protec/Blanchard have performed, then let me and the forum know.

Apparently, you failed to understand that Protec, Inc. is made up of demolition experts and Brent Blanchard has more than 20 years of demolition experience, which is evident by the fact that he is one of the top demolition experts in the whole world. :yes:

You've searched the Internet, but I went straight to the demolition sources using the telephone and emails to get to the rest of the story.Now, answer my question I posed to you the other day.

Is Brent Blanchard a leading world expert on demolition implosions? Yes, or No.

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 01:54 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#351    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:56 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 01:49 AM, said:

Apparently, you failed to understand that Protec, Inc. is made up of demolition experts and Brent Blanchard has more than 20 years of demolition experience, which is evident by the fact that he is one of the top demolition experts in the whole world. :yes:
Why would guys who you claim are demolition experts and demolish buildings give it up to work for a documentation company? lol

Protec are a documentation company, they do not do demolitions, they specialise in documenting and recording demolitions. Do you understand this part yet?? lol

It is not evident by the fact he is one of the top demolition experts in the world, it is evident by the fact that you can't cite us any evidence any of these imaginary 1000 demolitions you claim he or his company have done.

If his company had done 1000's of demolitions, don't you think they would mention it on their companies website?? :blink: :yes:

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#352    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:59 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 01:56 AM, said:

Why would guys who you claim are demolition experts and demolish buildings give it up to work for a documentation company? lol

You failed to read my post, and since you missed this post, here it is again.

Quote

Protec, Inc.

Posted Image

Protec Documentation Services is recognized as an international leader in the field of vibration studies, field monitoring and structure inspection services. Our exceptional reputation has earned us the responsibility of overseeing many of the most challenging high-profile construction, demolition and blasting projects ever undertaken, and we look forward to putting that experience to work for you.

Industry Memberships:

Protec and its Engineers and Field Representatives are active members of the following organizations:
  • National Demolition Association (NDA)
  • Institute of Explosive Engineers (IEE)
  • International Society of Explosive Engineers (ISEE)
  • Utility & Transportation Contractors Association (UTCA)

Now, answer my question.

Is Brent Blanchard a leading world demolition expert and a leading world authority on demolition implosions? Yes, or No.

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 02:07 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#353    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 02:10 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 01:59 AM, said:

You failed to read my post, and since you missed this post, here it is again.



Now, answer my question.

Is Brent Blanchard a leading world expert on demolition implosions? Yes, or No.
Sorry but whereabouts does it say that Brent Blanchard has demolished thousands of buildings?? :blink: hahahahahahaha!! It doesn't!

I think that Brent Blanchard might well be an international leader in the field of vibration studies, field monitoring and structure inspection services but he is not a leading expert on demolition implosions due to the fact there isn't any evidence that he has performed one before.

So that's a no.

Edited by Stundie, 06 February 2013 - 02:11 AM.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#354    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 04:54 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

Sorry but whereabouts does it say that Brent Blanchard has demolished thousands of buildings?? :blink: hahahahahahaha!! It doesn't!

You missed the point. I gave you the numbers that were provided to me by his company and other demolition experts and look what you posted. :w00t:

Quote

I think that Brent Blanchard might well be an international leader in the field of vibration studies, field monitoring and structure inspection services but he is not a leading expert on demolition implosions due to the fact there isn't any evidence that he has performed one before.

It takes a high-ranking demolition expert to lead such a company and to become a world authority on demolition implosives, which is why demolition companies around the world depend upon Brent Blanchard. In addition, Brent Blanchard has top knowledge on every aspect of demolition implosives, but you would have known that if you had contacted demolition experts and his company as I have.

So once again , you find  yourself in a lame position as always. :yes:

Now tell us, what has been told as far as how many buildings Brent Blanchard has demolished? Tell what has been said from time line: 0: 53 to 0:56 in the video.



Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 05:02 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#355    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 05:07 AM

View PostStundie, on 06 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

Sorry but whereabouts does it say that Brent Blanchard has demolished thousands of buildings??

Check the video at the reference given. In addition;

Quote

August 8, 2006: No Explosives Used in WTC Collapse, Says Demolition Industry Leader

Brent Blanchard, a leading professional and writer in the controlled demolition industry, publishes a 12-page report that says it refutes claims that the World Trade Center was destroyed with explosives. The report is published on ImplosionWorld.com, a demolition industry website edited by Blanchard.

Blanchard is also director of field operations for Protec Documentation Services, Inc., a company specializing in monitoring construction-related demolitions. In his report, Blanchard says that Protec had portable field seismographs in “several sites in Manhattan and Brooklyn” on 9/11. He says they did not show the “spikes” that would have been caused by explosions in the towers.

Blanchard also takes aim at the claim that Building 7 of the WTC was demolished, writing: “Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00 pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 within a few hundred feet of the event.

We have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in demolition, and all reported hearing or seeing nothing to indicate an explosive detonation precipitating the collapse.”

http://www.jod911.co...hard 8-8-06.pdf


Brent Blanchard is THE man of demolition implosions.

Brent Blanchard (February 2002). "A History of Explosive Demolition in America". Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. International Society of Explosives Engineers.


How Building Implosions Work

According to Brent Blanchard, an implosion expert with the demolition consulting firm Protec Documentation Services, virtually every building in the world is unique. And for any given building, there are any number of ways a blasting crew might bring it down. Blanchard notes the demolition of the Hayes Homes, a 10-building housing project in Newark, New Jersey, which was demolished in three separate phases over the course of three years.

"A different blasting firm performed each phase," Blanchard says, "and although all of the buildings were identical, each blaster chose a slightly different type of explosive and loaded varying numbers of support columns. They even brought the buildings down in different mathematical sequences, with varying amounts of time factored in between each building's collapse."

http://science.howst...g-implosion.htm

Spoken like a true leading world demolition expert that he is. :yes:

Now, for the record, are you claiming that Brent Blanchard is not a world-class demolition expert? Yes, or No.

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 05:49 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#356    flyingswan

flyingswan

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,819 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:44 AM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 05 February 2013 - 10:20 PM, said:

This was not a normal building fire Swan.  Normal building fires do not bring the buildings down at nearly free fall rates, do not create molten metal, and do not leave simmering pools of molten metal.  There are many other characteristics of these particular events never experienced before.  That is a very poor choice of words, normal building fire.
What makes you so irritating to debate is the way you either don't bother to read any links I provide or misunderstand them if you do.  I've just provided a link when fire caused a steel structure to collapse, I've just provided you a link showing molten aluminium in a building fire test and you just reply that normal fires "do not bring buildings down" and "do not create molten metal".

I've also shown that their is nothing unusual about iron microspheres, yet you are still claiming you need boiling steel to produce them.  You cannot use commonplace phenomena to suggest that something is suspicious.

As to free-fall speed, that depends on the type of structure and the way that it fails.  Slim  steel columns provide little resistance once they have begun to buckle, hence rapid collapse is not suspicious either.

Quote

I'm perfectly happy to accept that it might have been molten aluminum, if only you could make the case.  If only you could validate your theory.  So far, you have not.  You do not even attempt to discuss what ratio of iron to aluminum might have been present, so that your theory might take its first step.  So far Swan, all you offer is maybe this or maybe that.
If you have a mixture of substances exposed to fire, those with the lowest melting points will naturally melt first.  When they become liquid, they will naturally flow to the lowest point they can reach.  This process is all you need to get a pool of molten aluminium, lead, etc from a mixture that is 90% (or 99%, or whatever) steel.  If the aluminium is there to start with, and the facade alone provided thousands of tons, molten aluminium is just a matter of the fires being hot enough.

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true" - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
In which case it is fortunate that:
"Science is the best defense against believing what we want to" - Ian Stewart (1945- )

#357    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,307 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 06 February 2013 - 06:51 PM

Swan

Sorry, I do not see much similar between WTC and a warehouse, really.  Do you?

Some experts, including Cahill I think, claim that the only way iron particles can be released is when the metal is at boiling point.  I don't know, and neither you nor I have the luxury of being able to ask him whether welding or cutting steel can release such particles.  You are probably right on that point, but we have no way to quantify how much welding or cutting was going on.  I do not know if the data collected plotted time periods of high and low samples.

I am willing to entertain that aluminum might have been the culprit metal, and I think a good way to get started on that analysis is to determine the ratio of steel to aluminum or other metals involved in the construction of the buildings.  You seem to have walked away from that theory of yours.

The notion advanced by Sky that the aluminum fuselage provided sufficient metal to have pools is ludicrous.  How could that aluminum, shredded by the steel of the buildings and representing a very small number of the total weight, migrate down to the basement level in a neat package?  That is absurd to propose, and IMO, a sign of how desperate the position is.

Further, you also walk away from the energy source to keep metal molten for many weeks.

Face it--under close scrutiny the official story falls apart.  It cannot be proved, and the evidence works against it.


#358    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,155 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 06 February 2013 - 08:00 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 06 February 2013 - 06:51 PM, said:

I am willing to entertain that aluminum might have been the culprit metal,...

The silvery droplets painted a clear picture.

Quote

The notion advanced by Sky that the aluminum fuselage provided sufficient metal to have pools is ludicrous.  How could that aluminum, shredded by the steel of the buildings and representing a very small number of the total weight, migrate down to the basement level in a neat package?  That is absurd to propose, and IMO, a sign of how desperate the position is.

How many tons of aluminum was used in the contruction of the B-767 and in the facade of the WTC buildings?

Quote

Face it--under close scrutiny the official story falls apart.  It cannot be proved, and the evidence works against it.

One the contrary, it has been proven the metal was not steel and that fire, not explosives, brought down the WTC buildings.

Edited by skyeagle409, 06 February 2013 - 08:20 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#359    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:41 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 04:54 AM, said:

You missed the point. I gave you the numbers that were provided to me by his company and other demolition experts and look what you posted. :w00t:
I haven't missed a thing....lol

There are no numbers because you have invented it, this is why there is no mention of Protec or Blanchard having done thousands of demolitions. :w00t:

If he or his company were demolishing buildings, then they would mention it wouldn't they? :blink:

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 04:54 AM, said:

It takes a high-ranking demolition expert to lead such a company and to become a world authority on demolition implosives, which is why demolition companies around the world depend upon Brent Blanchard.

Not for his expertise on demolition because as we know, he has never done a demolition. They depend on him for his documentation skills.....lol

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 04:54 AM, said:

In addition, Brent Blanchard has top knowledge on every aspect of demolition implosives, but you would have known that if you had contacted demolition experts and his company as I have.

So once again , you find  yourself in a lame position as always. :yes:
Yeah, cause I'm the one whose claiming that Protec or Blanchard have demolished thousands of builings without evidence of any of them, not even a single one is mentioned on their website, yet you STILL believe they have performed thousands. :w00t:

What a lame position I am in? hahahahaha!!

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 04:54 AM, said:

Now tell us, what has been told as far as how many buildings Brent Blanchard has demolished? Tell what has been said from time line: 0: 53 to 0:56 in the video.
What is said in the video.....Hilarious!
The commentator Andrew Maxwell who is also the man standing with Blanchard says...

"Brent Blanchard as performed thousand of demolitions on buildings."

That is your evidence??........Excuse me but......hahahahahahaha!! Oh come on, you can't be serious? A comedian who says Blanchard has performed thousand of demolitions when there isn't a single documented demolition of a building he has done, anywhere on the internet or his website is EVIDENCE and must mean  that he TRULY has demolished thousands of buildings.  

You're almost a good comedian as Andrew Maxwell..... :w00t:

Unless you have some better evidence other than hearsay, I would you suggest you think about your position.

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.

#360    Stundie

Stundie

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,541 posts
  • Joined:03 Oct 2009

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:47 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 06 February 2013 - 08:00 PM, said:

One the contrary, it has been proven the metal was not steel and that fire, not explosives, brought down the WTC buildings.
Please feel free to expand on why you think you know better than those at GZ who claimed they saw molten steel and how it has been proven its not steel?

There is no such thing as magic, just magicians and fools.