psyche101, on 14 February 2013 - 05:12 AM, said:
The how do you view the Griffith University Innocence Project that has direct evidence that contradicts your ideal with regards to personal testimony? Ever since I mentioned it, you refuse to answer me based on that you think I am dismissive yet what are you doing to a bonafide study by a recognised group who are the foremost in this field?
I think you have an idea, and you believe anyone who may find a problem or error in it is "dismissed". Your entire claim contradicts itself. So much for the truth huh?
I apologize. I meant to reply to your post, which was quite thoughtful. I went on a "post and reply" spree in which I quickly wrote random thoughts. Your message deserved more time.
You mentioned one study, and that didn't serve as a good proxy for events that took place over a wide swath of space and time. If varied people experienced the same events, independent of each other, they likely took place. This was especially true when they had no idea about the common event before they experienced it. Added to that, I believed people, who experienced paranormal events, because I trusted them. Their nonverbal communication was as convincing as their words. Some of them had no knowledge or understanding of the events before they experienced them. They had no references from which to draw ideas that might skew their interpretations of them. Experiments often are beneficial to understanding human nature, but many of them are poor substitutions for real life.
There is one reality with billions of versions.