So using that logic may I ask if you would find Zosers beliefs more 'credible' than Mitchells on the ETH simply based on the fact that Zoser also doesnt subscribe to any of the mentioned above areas?
(apologies for using you in this example Zoser, but I am using Psyches perception of you to show my point.....it is not a perception I personally agree with but thats neither here nor there....neither is whether you really belive in religion esp etc...at least not for the hypothetical posed)
Does Zoser not subscribe to any of those? Does he not cite the Bible on a fairly regular basis? That is supernatural.
Zoserism - If you want something factual; look at the footage. We don't need text books to tell us facts; there are other ways. - LINK
I do not find one single thing that Zoser has ever typed even remotely credible. Rather than a belief, I truly consider his claims fantasy.
No, if the above was the case, which I cannot say I feel is the case, then again no, as Zoser has demonstrated no value in his ramblings, and obviously has lied about real world experience. Edgar Mitchell allows for experimentation, so at least he has attempted to find an answer, where as Zoser has not. Zoser just makes stuff up, and expects other people to believe his crazy nonsense and tries to act like an authority, when he is anything but.