Lava_Lady, on 02 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
Anyway, Jesus aka Joshua bin Joseph never wrote anything down so, we'll never know FOR SURE what he referred to himself as... could have been Homey the Clown for all we know.
True that Jesus himself never wrote anything down (at least, we don't have any evidence that he ever wrote any parchments). But that's not surprising since most of the people Jesus hung around with couldn't read. FYI, Jesus/Joshua is just a matter of whether you want to translate
Yeshua into Greek (Jesus) or Hebrew (Joshua).
Lava_Lady, on 02 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
The bible is just a collection of testimonies from various people and all of these writings happened hundreds of years after Jesus's death.
Incorrect. The Bible is NOT just a collection of testimonies written hundreds of years after Jesus' death. First there's the Old Testament, written 400 years and more before Jesus. Then there are the writings of some of the early apostles (Paul being the most common). His writings appear as early as fifteen years after the death of Jesus. Then there are the gospels (perhaps it is to these that you referred to when you spoke of "the Bible") - the gospels included in the Bible were all written 40-90 years after Jesus' death, not even 100 years after Jesus.
Your claim that hundreds of years passed is just wrong. Though if you have evidence saying otherwise, I'd be happy to hear it. If you're interested in looking at it,
THIS SITE is a good start.
Lava_Lady, on 02 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
They were put together into one book, SELECTIVELY, by King Constantine and his henchmen.
Emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea, and there was a selective process, but if you look at the history of it, the sinister overtones you suggest are not there.
Lava_Lady, on 02 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
And as we all know the dang thing has been translated, paraphrased & diluted so many freakin times that you have your pick of hundreds!
True we have hundreds of translations to choose from, but they all come from the same source material, the earliest Greek texts (for the New Testament) and the earliest Hebrew and Aramaic texts for the Old Testament. It's not a case of translating from one language into another into another into another into another. Most Christians don't care which translation is used, most translations say the same thing in slightly different words. There are some Christians who are KJV-only, and some of these believe that the KJV is the only authorised English translation, and this group represents a small but vocal minority. But they are not the norm, at least not nowadays.
Lava_Lady, on 02 January 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:
The interpretation is what causes all the arguments and wars, factions don't agree, they split up, fight, kill each other.
And here I must disagree again. Religion is used as an excuse to cause wars in order to satisfy a greed for power, wealth, land, etc. Or it is used as an excuse to perpetuate racial hatred which also causes wars. Either way, the underlying cause is ethnicity or greed. If Religion didn't exist these people would just use other methods of perpetuating their hatred and violence.
Edited by Paranoid Android, 03 January 2013 - 01:17 AM.