Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Is Barack firing military leaders


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#31    SurgeTechnologies

SurgeTechnologies

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not disclosed

  • "Why not take what seems to me the only chance of escaping what is otherwise the sure destruction"

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:43 PM

More over Obama is concerned by you folks...

Quote

Violence derived from the modern anti-federalist movement appeared in full force only
in the early to mid-1990s and is interested in undermining the influence, legitimacy and
effective sovereignty of the federal government and its proxy organizations. The antifederalist rationale is multifaceted, and includes the beliefs that the American political
system and its proxies were hijacked by external forces interested in promoting a “New
World Order” (NWO) in which the United States will be absorbed into the United
Nations or another version of global government
Information written in new counter terrorism handbook of sort... from your West Point....Here is full article.

I guess hes prepairing for some sort of terrorist act ( again ) but this time from you guys.

Now why the hell would one want to suggest NWO i never believed in such stuff now it is mentioned like a guildline!
That came as shock to me...

Edited by Tesla II, 27 January 2013 - 11:45 PM.

" Technology has exceeded our humanity. "

#32    Drayno

Drayno

    Reverend Dudemeister

  • Member
  • 3,615 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:45 PM

View PostGromdor, on 27 January 2013 - 07:54 PM, said:

The need to possibly shoot fellow citizens is in the constitution.  The whole second ammendment thing we have been dicussing for the last month is one example.  Also the whole "Swearing to protect the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic", oath that all military members take that Asteroid X pointed out.

The soldiers could interpret freedom loving Americans as the domestic enemies, or the oppressive government as the domestic enemy.

That's the schism we would see in the event soldiers were told to fire upon US citizens.

As for various handbooks referring to liberty loving Americans as "right wing terrorists", this classification has obviously been implemented for a reason. The Left seem hell bent on making any one who owns a gun to be deranged, a Nazi, a terrorist, or a murderer. That seems to be their goal; so they can blame the next atrocity on gun owners and just pass them all off as terrorists. Those who throw the word "terrorist" around liberally often have an agenda.

Usually to eliminate those who would be considered political opponents.

Edited by Eonwe, 27 January 2013 - 11:48 PM.

"A belief is like a guillotine, just as heavy, just as light." - Franz Kafka

#33    Stellar

Stellar

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,579 posts
  • Joined:27 Apr 2004
  • Gender:Male

  • The objective of war is not to die for your country. It's to make the other son of a b**** die for his!
    -Patton

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:05 AM

View PostEonwe, on 27 January 2013 - 11:45 PM, said:



The soldiers could interpret freedom loving Americans as the domestic enemies, or the oppressive government as the domestic enemy.

That's the schism we would see in the event soldiers were told to fire upon US citizens.

As for various handbooks referring to liberty loving Americans as "right wing terrorists", this classification has obviously been implemented for a reason. The Left seem hell bent on making any one who owns a gun to be deranged, a Nazi, a terrorist, or a murderer. That seems to be their goal; so they can blame the next atrocity on gun owners and just pass them all off as terrorists. Those who throw the word "terrorist" around liberally often have an agenda.

Usually to eliminate those who would be considered political opponents.

Or, maybe it's in response to all those "liberty loving Americans" that keep saying theyll start a revolution.

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent."

----Seraphina

#34    SurgeTechnologies

SurgeTechnologies

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not disclosed

  • "Why not take what seems to me the only chance of escaping what is otherwise the sure destruction"

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:09 AM

So the good doctor says something in words like " Obama has set up " economic zones " throught out US for which.. China wants resourses lile coal,oil,natural gas which China doesnt have BUT US needs to repay the debt somehow.. and thus China will take the resourses. "

Now Obama is affraid that you good people of US will not agree with such decision and that is why West point officer made that guideline. They are affraid that you guys will stand up and say NO we wont give China what it wants, yet debt needs to be repaid... By the way Doctor said that such debt will never be repaid...

I hope you understood this. This is a loooong link that ends in US debt to China. There is so much more info given...that you need to see it yourself.

The firing on US citizens is just a snowball on tip of iceberg...

Edited by Tesla II, 28 January 2013 - 12:11 AM.

" Technology has exceeded our humanity. "

#35    Drayno

Drayno

    Reverend Dudemeister

  • Member
  • 3,615 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:12 AM

View PostStellar, on 28 January 2013 - 12:05 AM, said:

Or, maybe it's in response to all those "liberty loving Americans" that keep saying theyll start a revolution.


“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.” - Thomas Jefferson

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Our country was founded by revolution. That is why, in my opinion, it is inherently violent.

I do not call for senseless violence, but I recognize we created our government and we can abolish it if we need to. If you would like to argue against The Declaration of Independence you might want to consider what nationality you are and how many people have died to secure our ability as a nation to recreate a just government in the case our government starts to take our rights away; you know, like disarming the population through attrition or gun bills - trying to take away the ability of the population to abolish a bad government, aka, guns.

Edited by Eonwe, 28 January 2013 - 12:17 AM.

"A belief is like a guillotine, just as heavy, just as light." - Franz Kafka

#36    SurgeTechnologies

SurgeTechnologies

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not disclosed

  • "Why not take what seems to me the only chance of escaping what is otherwise the sure destruction"

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:24 AM

Anyways the bottom point of all this is will you guys give China what it wants or stand up for no .. and overcome your current administration. That is why they need generals which will be able to supress any civil ressistance.

China does not want WAR ... they stated that too, but they are concerned by population armed to teeth.. face it after Sandy hook people are probably more armed than army, gun sale skyrocketed. And they are afriad that you folks will do just that rebel. And that is why they wanted to restrict gun laws abit and for example in Seattle you could return a weapon for some cash card?? ( Some guy even brought a small rocket launcher for 1 time use ).. They tried to disarm you as much as they could if in case it would come to such situation.  But your 2nd amend... is giving you some air to breathe, they cant disarm all..

There you have it that is all about. All i wrote came from good doctor and some came from hes source.

Now it is up to America to give or fight.

" Technology has exceeded our humanity. "

#37    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:24 AM

Quote

"liberty loving Americans"

Im going to add also those that believe in the Constitution and the foundations it was written for.

If it doesnt suit you noones making you stay. But its what this country was built on.


#38    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:26 AM

@Tesla: the only thing Im willing to give China is 2cents of every purchase made from Wallmart. The debt we owe them will be paid off within the year or two.


#39    SurgeTechnologies

SurgeTechnologies

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not disclosed

  • "Why not take what seems to me the only chance of escaping what is otherwise the sure destruction"

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:30 AM

View PostAsteroidX, on 28 January 2013 - 12:26 AM, said:

@Tesla: the only thing Im willing to give China is 2cents of every purchase made from Wallmart. The debt we owe them will be paid off within the year or two.

So tell me then how will pay it off? Print more money? Your 2cents or 300 trillion dollars is worthless to them. Like i said they need resourses and they will get'em one way or another... process is already in motion.. now its up to you

Edited by Tesla II, 28 January 2013 - 12:31 AM.

" Technology has exceeded our humanity. "

#40    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:32 AM

Im sure Big Pharm can send them enough Paxil to make them not depressed over the debt for a few more years. :tu:


#41    SurgeTechnologies

SurgeTechnologies

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,214 posts
  • Joined:21 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not disclosed

  • "Why not take what seems to me the only chance of escaping what is otherwise the sure destruction"

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:34 AM

Not everything is a joke... anyway i just wanted to tell you what is all about. Good luck! :tu: :tsu:

" Technology has exceeded our humanity. "

#42    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:38 AM

AFAIK China is irrelevant to our current conversations. But yeah I hear you.


#43    F3SS

F3SS

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,433 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:47 AM

View PostTiggs, on 27 January 2013 - 11:38 PM, said:



I think that a much more interesting question is how would someone know that they were a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize, given that the nominations are kept secret for fifty years?

You can find the answer to that, and lots of other interesting questions, such as where he got his doctorate from - here.
That's a pretty thorough destruction of character. I read the first 3 of eight pages then skimmed real quick. It was all bad. A shyster it seems. Maybe not though. But yea, probably. Only thing is that this particular Facebook comment seems out of his territory or M.O.. Unless there was something in there I didn't read that he's done this type of thing before. He seems to be all about the Ponzi scheme.

Posted Image

#44    Uncle Sam

Uncle Sam

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,111 posts
  • Joined:26 Jul 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:52 AM

Any citizen of this nation who considers themselves as a American should not stand for their land and resources being taken away by China, who is making bad room deals with our president and diplomats to pay off the debt. China is setting up Chinese only zones within America. If you don't believe me, research this yourself.

A man's ethical behaviour should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. - Albert Einstein

#45    WoIverine

WoIverine

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,682 posts
  • Joined:16 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 January 2013 - 02:17 AM

As the tension between China, Japan, and the US builds, more kindling gets thrown on the fire it seems. The US really doesn't need added international drama right now, especially with so much going on at home already.

Edited by WoIverine, 28 January 2013 - 02:34 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users