and then, on 08 October 2012 - 06:48 PM, said:
You were, once again, making silly arguments about toys when you know they had nothing of importance to do with what I was talking about. I agree that not only was that word inappropriate to the situation it was inappropriate altogether and I will not "name call" again. My apologies. I also understand your stance against subsidizing foreign governments and in the case of Egypt I agree. We can add Afghanistan to that list and pencil in Pakistan unless some very large changes for the better begin happening there soon. The "aid" to Pakistan is little more than extortion payment at this point.
My toy comment wasn't directed at anything you were talking about.
A drone IS a glorified toy. But I know, it's a gobmint toy, so it's more legitimate in the statist mind.
Every example of foreign aid is extortion of the taxpayer, whether someone here finds a rhetorical reason to agree with it or not. It should all come off, on principle. If someone cares about a foreign country they should pay for it themselves. The crux of my disagreement with you here is one of voluntarism vs. force. I'm all for people voluntarily giving it to whoever they want. I'm opposed to letting government, a known gang of liars who have delivered more BS to the American people over the decades than they deserve, take our money by force and give it away to its own foreign interests.