Hickson described the UFO as “a blue light,” adding: “It circled a bit.” He emphasized it was blue, saying, “And you think you dreamin’ about something like that, you know”
I thought you are aware of what you do but what you see may not be there...i.e. you punch a monster you see....the punch motion is happening but there is no monster.....so you would have to paddle a boat even though hallucinating that you are being carried...this is where it falls down IMO
the dreaming comment he made is a figure of speach..(although you already know that )
Is this not a hole in the abduction claim?
I agree with Kevin Randle who insists Hickson’s alterations went beyond embellishment. Specifically, he says, “These changes seemed to be in response to criticisms and appeared to be an attempt to smooth out rough spots in the story.”
Also consistent with my hypothesis.
rough spots such as?
That was an added detail too wasn't it? Didn't the original story only speak of a big eye like thing following them?
you are correct this detail was added later once hypnotic regression happened so safe to say we must ignore this coupled with 'embellishments' so we are not accused of cherry picking
Not one actual name?
ok try Diamond and Ryder as the first two
now, what were the names of those operators Joe'proven liar' Esterhas (possibly says he spoke to) mentions ?