Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

If it is possible to create a false reality


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1    Godsnmbr1

Godsnmbr1

    The Bee's Knees

  • Member
  • 2,317 posts
  • Joined:11 Jul 2008
  • Gender:Male

  • There's someone in my head
    but it's not me

Posted 01 April 2013 - 03:07 AM

Does anyone disagree with this statement?  If so, why?  

It's the basis of the Simulation Hypothesis http://en.wikipedia....lation_argument

So far I can't recall seeing any of the intelligent arguments against it so I was hoping some of you might help.  But ignore the problem of simulations in simulations, ad infinitum. That doesn't matter right now.

Remember, we are all just acting out a grand old game here, where we agree to forget who we really are, that in the remembering, that we may find each other again, and know that we are One. That All of Life, is One.

#2    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,806 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 01 April 2013 - 03:21 AM

I don't think a "false"  reality can be created. Reality is Real... and therefore cannot be false.   A Simulation imitates the appearance or character of  Reality.


simulate |ˈsimyəˌlāt|
verb [ with obj. ]
imitate the appearance or character of:  

reality |rēˈalətē|
noun ( pl. realities )
1 the world or the state of things as they actually exist,  


     *

Edited by lightly, 01 April 2013 - 03:24 AM.

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#3    Whatsinausername

Whatsinausername

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 181 posts
  • Joined:12 May 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:N.Z.

  • My God's not dead he's surely alive.

Posted 01 April 2013 - 03:48 AM

Its called Facebook


#4    pitchp

pitchp

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 210 posts
  • Joined:20 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male

  • "I go when I want to go. To prolong life would be tasteless"
    Albert Einstein

Posted 01 April 2013 - 04:13 AM

View PostGodsnmbr1, on 01 April 2013 - 03:07 AM, said:

Does anyone disagree with this statement?  If so, why?  

It's the basis of the Simulation Hypothesis http://en.wikipedia....lation_argument

So far I can't recall seeing any of the intelligent arguments against it so I was hoping some of you might help.  But ignore the problem of simulations in simulations, ad infinitum. That doesn't matter right now.

As much as I'd love to say that reality is real. The quantum physics facts says other wise. I really hate to admit it, but yes we are all sharing one big illusion. It is because of this, that I am seeking the ending of my soul. This is just completely redicoulous. And yes the bible has written that our souls are immortal. We are all immortals sharing and living together temporary in one giant illusion. After several lifetimes it becomes a joke

Edited by pitchp, 01 April 2013 - 04:13 AM.

"The truth is out there. We are all searching for it."
   PitchP

#5    Almagest

Almagest

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 813 posts
  • Joined:16 Mar 2013

Posted 01 April 2013 - 05:04 AM

Your own perception is a simulation based on sensory data collected by various organs. If you're interested in stuff like that I greatly recommend reading Philip K Dick.

Life is the result of the struggle between dynamic opposites Form & Chaos, Substance & Oblivion, Light & Dark And all the infinite variations of Yin & Yang
When the pendulum swings in favour of one It will eventually swing in favour of it's opposite Thus the balance of the universe is maintained

-Jeru the Damaja

#6    awest

awest

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 89 posts
  • Joined:08 Oct 2011

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:36 AM

View Postpitchp, on 01 April 2013 - 04:13 AM, said:

As much as I'd love to say that reality is real. The quantum physics facts says other wise. I really hate to admit it, but yes we are all sharing one big illusion. It is because of this, that I am seeking the ending of my soul. This is just completely redicoulous. And yes the bible has written that our souls are immortal. We are all immortals sharing and living together temporary in one giant illusion. After several lifetimes it becomes a joke

Actually the holographic universe principal is far from being sound enough to call a fact as is string theory on which it is based. Is it possible? Sure, anything is possible. But it certianly isn't a fact.


#7    Rlyeh

Rlyeh

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,038 posts
  • Joined:01 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The sixth circle

  • Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:42 AM

View Postpitchp, on 01 April 2013 - 04:13 AM, said:

As much as I'd love to say that reality is real. The quantum physics facts says other wise. I really hate to admit it, but yes we are all sharing one big illusion. It is because of this, that I am seeking the ending of my soul. This is just completely redicoulous. And yes the bible has written that our souls are immortal. We are all immortals sharing and living together temporary in one giant illusion. After several lifetimes it becomes a joke
The holographic universe has nothing to do with the simulation argument.


#8    awest

awest

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 89 posts
  • Joined:08 Oct 2011

Posted 01 April 2013 - 06:44 AM

View PostGodsnmbr1, on 01 April 2013 - 03:07 AM, said:

Does anyone disagree with this statement?  If so, why?  

It's the basis of the Simulation Hypothesis http://en.wikipedia....lation_argument

So far I can't recall seeing any of the intelligent arguments against it so I was hoping some of you might help.  But ignore the problem of simulations in simulations, ad infinitum. That doesn't matter right now.
There is no reason why it couldn't be possible, we would likely have the technology to do so ourselves at some point in the near future. We can already take MRI scans and construct a realativly accurate picture of what someone is thinking about, turning the information around and feeding it into a brain shouldn't be that much more difficult. The hardest part of a simulation like that I belive would be keeping all the sensory data in tune with what the person thinks they are doing.

http://pinktentacle....tly-from-brain/

Edited by awest, 01 April 2013 - 06:47 AM.


#9    stillvoice

stillvoice

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 26 posts
  • Joined:26 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 April 2013 - 09:07 AM

I do not know whether a false reality can be simulated but certainly the mass culture of capitalist societies can create a false perception of reality in reducing social dynamics to market forces which perpetrates the latent competitiveness of our culture which is a catalyst for the social injustice and intolerance that is widely exhibited throughout overtly capitalist societies.


#10    eight bits

eight bits

    ...

  • Member
  • 6,168 posts
  • Joined:24 May 2007

Posted 01 April 2013 - 10:46 AM

Greetings, Number One.

Probabilstic reasoning is difficult even for people who work with it. I could tell stories :) . Anyway, let us assume that the calculations actually do support that

There are many simulations and exactly one (real) reality.

So, it is true

Most things that are either simulations or reality are simulations.

In what sense(s), then, can we conclude

It is probable that some chosen object which is either a simulation or a reality is a simulation.

?

Well, let's think back to St Patrick's Day, when there were only two kinds of people in the world:

20,000,000 Irish (Eire definition: someone born in Ireland, or with at least one parent or grandparent born there), and 6,980,000,000 simulated Irish.

So, 349 out of 350 people on Earth that day were simulated Irish.

Does it follow then, that I am probably not Irish?

Um, no. I am in fact Irish. "The" probability that I am Irish is exactly one: I am Irish. At least one of the required events, a birth in Ireland of one or more among seven designated people, actually happened.

But there are other low-probability statements that work fine, such as:

A randomly selected person from Earth is probably not Irish.

Quite so, it's objectively 349: 1 against.

So how can it be simultaneously true that I am certainly Irish, and also true that I am (or may be said to be) unlikely to be Irish?

Well, for one thing, I may be haphazardly selected, but I am not randomly selected. I only brought up the attribute of Irishness because I am Irish. I "selected" the category (something about myself which I share with relatively few people), I wasn't selected from the world's people and tested for membership among the world's Irish. My being Irish is not independent of my proposing that people be classified according to their Irishness.

The difference between the Irishness case and the reality case is that we don't know how this reality was selected for undergoing this examination of it real-ness. In particular, we don't know that being real is or is not independent of trying to test the reality for its real-ness "from inside." In fact. we doubt it. If this guy with plenty of time on his hands, who is paid for spining puzzles, had thought about this, and couldn't have spun it, then we wouldn't be discussing it.

Finally, there is no "The" probability of any contingency whatsoever. There are probabilities, plural, depending on what information is taken into account in estimating the probability. Furthermore, if the meaning of the probability is to represent a person's confidence in an uncertain statement, then when the same information is taken into account, there can be as many probabilities as there people estimating the probability, all of them "valid."

Example: That genuine Irishness is rare is a reason for you to doubt my statement that I am Irish. If so, "one in 350" accurately represents your state of belief about my ethnicity. However, it has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not I am, in fact, Irish. But, that cuts both ways; my being irish has nothing to do with your doubt about it.

I hope that these remarks are of some help.

Posted Image

#11    StarMountainKid

StarMountainKid

    Cheese

  • Member
  • 3,918 posts
  • Joined:17 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Star Mountain, Corporate States of America

  • We have problems because we stray from what is innocent and pure.

Posted 01 April 2013 - 02:11 PM

There are logical arguments that our reality is a simulation, but to simulate an entire universe may not be as easy as we think. A simulation would have to be based on the behavior of a natural universe. At what depth of a natural reality would a simulation have to be based on?

For instance, if we just simulate how the universe behaves at the quantum scale and combine this with how the universe behaves on the largest scale (relativity), would that computer program create a 'real' universe?

A simulation I think would have to be based on a more fundamental level of reality than these two mechanisms. Of course a species with greater intelligence than ours may have discovered how the universe works on a level beyond quantum mechanics and relativity theory.

I think a simulation to create a 'real' universe would would be required to create 'the thing itself'. In other words, it would have to simulate not only behavior but what is behaving.

This may not be possible, because even a superior species may not be able to define what is behaving. It's like the brain trying to understand itself. The part of the brain trying to understand the brain is part of the brain itself, and therefore lies external to the attempted understanding. A complete understanding is therefore not possible.

I think similarly, a complete or successful simulation would always be just that: a simulation and not the actual thing in itself.

The acceptance of authority does not lead to intelligence.
A mind untouched by thought...the end of knowledge.
My credentials: http://www.unexplain...ic=87935&st=225

#12    White Crane Feather

White Crane Feather

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,069 posts
  • Joined:12 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Potter: " is this real or is this in my mind?"

    Dumbledore: " Of course it's in your mind....., but that dosn't mean it's not real."

Posted 01 April 2013 - 04:48 PM

View Poststillvoice, on 01 April 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:

I do not know whether a false reality can be simulated but certainly the mass culture of capitalist societies can create a false perception of reality in reducing social dynamics to market forces which perpetrates the latent competitiveness of our culture which is a catalyst for the social injustice and intolerance that is widely exhibited throughout overtly capitalist societies.
These are generally externalities. Capitalism is not followed properly in most capitalist country's. If it were externalities would be heavily regulated.

"I wish neither to possess, Nor to be possessed. I no longer covet paradise, more important, I no longer fear hell. The medicine for my suffering I had within me from the very beginning, but I did not take it. My ailment came from within myself, But I did not observe it until this moment. Now I see that I will never find the light.  Unless, like the candle, I am my own fuel, Consuming myself. "
Bruce Lee-

#13    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,121 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

  • “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” — Leonardo da Vinci

Posted 01 April 2013 - 09:06 PM

View PostGodsnmbr1, on 01 April 2013 - 03:07 AM, said:

Does anyone disagree with this statement?  If so, why?  

It's the basis of the Simulation Hypothesis http://en.wikipedia....lation_argument

So far I can't recall seeing any of the intelligent arguments against it so I was hoping some of you might help.  But ignore the problem of simulations in simulations, ad infinitum. That doesn't matter right now.

Does is being a 3d expression of 2d information in black holes represent a simulation?

"This is a real disconnect and it's very hard to get your head around," said Susskind in the first episode of NOVA's The Fabric of the Cosmos with Brian Greene. But the concept of the universe as a hologram arises from the mathematical study of black holes. When an object - say a red rubber ball - gets sucked into a black hole, it passes the event horizon and is lost. The distinctions that make that object unique, however, do not disappear. Instead, information about the ball's redness and spherical shape spreads over the surface of the event horizon, forming a two-dimensional shell of information. Theoretically, a computer could even use that shell to reconstruct a duplicate of the original ball.
The math that describes the black hole's information shell matches the math describing the universe as a hologram. Although the concept seems utterly alien, Susskind says, "I think it's already reached a consensus" in the theoretical physics community. Still, the theory could be proven wrong - except any experiment devised to do so would be too complex for our technology to implement.
http://www.pbs.org/w...-of-cosmos.html

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#14    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,188 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 01 April 2013 - 11:29 PM

View PostGodsnmbr1, on 01 April 2013 - 03:07 AM, said:

Does anyone disagree with this statement?  If so, why?  

It's the basis of the Simulation Hypothesis http://en.wikipedia....lation_argument

So far I can't recall seeing any of the intelligent arguments against it so I was hoping some of you might help.  But ignore the problem of simulations in simulations, ad infinitum. That doesn't matter right now.

The hypothesis is illogical and unlikely to be true. It is remotely "possible" that it is true but certainly not probable.

Here is my reasoning. As an evolutionist i understand and acknowledge how i came to be, and how my conscious self awreness evolved to the point it is now. I know that i could  theoretically create an artifical simulationion  using technologies of the near future; BUT there is a diosconnect  between my abilty to do so given my evolved past, and the proven or even likely ability of any other sapient entity to have already done it.

It requires the same sort of belief/creative thinking needed to accept creation as plausible. If we managed to create such a reality and were able to observe the reactions repsonses and understandings of any beings within it, we might have a more accurate knowledge of their existence and beliefs /understandings. This might be applicable to understanding  our own, but it does not mean we are, or are even likely to be, a similar construct.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.

#15    Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,188 posts
  • Joined:09 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Australia

  • Sometimes the Phantom leaves the jungle, and walks the streets of the city like an ordinary man.

Posted 01 April 2013 - 11:45 PM

View PostAlmagest, on 01 April 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:

Your own perception is a simulation based on sensory data collected by various organs. If you're interested in stuff like that I greatly recommend reading Philip K Dick.
But the objective reality exists indpendent of us and our senses or perceptions, and would continue to exist in entirely the same form if we disappeared. eg a dog does not walk through a rock that a human bumps into.  A tree would continue to shelter the ground even if were were not standing under it and observing this.

We may artificially  and consciously alter both our external objective reality, and internal perceived reality, but this does not deny their objective existence. Even our perceived reality is a physical/ objective construct of our brains. like a knife is a physicla objective construct of our hands. It  physically exists  within neurons and synapses in our brain, and can be observed, created altered  copied and destroyed, just like things in the physical world.

Hhere is an interesting observation Say my mind can be transferred using technology to another human being. But if that human being has perfect colour sight I will suddenly see and understand subtleties of colours which my old self never did.  In other words while our human body controls our perceptions via our senses, our mind can connect with and understand multiple realities  if it is allowed to do so via an extension of our senses. When a blind person is made able to see, or a deaf person to hear , their perception of reality changes. So does their internal reality; but the external reality remains unchanged and unchanging.

Edited by Mr Walker, 01 April 2013 - 11:52 PM.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world..

Be cheerful.

Strive to be happy.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users