DingoLingo, on 19 December 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:
Have either of you had any formal training in languages? or have you just learned from reading books on ancient languages that others have written?
Only as far as high school languages for me.
But what Pegg has found isn’t ‘translation’ as such using language. It is returning the English use of words (as found in the KJV Bible as referenced in Strong’s Concordance) to their original meaning and context.
Like the child’s game of chinese whispers, what was originally seen, then told, then retold over periods of time changed may have changed somewhat.
To learn a language, one will learn all the old mistakes that were made.
Just looking in the Lexicons of Strong’s Concordance, anyone can plainly see that what the Old English scribes ‘gave’ as their translation, often in many cases, is not what the original Hebrew nor Greek word meant.
DingoLingo, on 19 December 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:
considering we are talking a 386 computer.. so it would have have a 5 1/4" fdd.. so the disc memory size would be 320kb.. 5 `1/4" drives were the standard drive on a 386.. unless the travelers go a 3 1/2" dd to install into it.. then the file size would be 1.44 mb..
Quaentum, on 19 December 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:
The 386 did not come with a CD drive as standard equipment. In fact CD Drives didn't become common place in computers until 1997 and considering that 486 computers were introduced in 1989 and Pentium computers in 1993, there would have been no 386's with CD drives to be had.
Incorrect assumption.
I owned a 386PC which I upgraded with a sound card and a two speed cd-drive. We are talking Australia here, and at that time, the package came with the Grolier Encyclopedia cd-rom.
A 386PC did exist with a cd-rom. I had one.