Mass Sen Passed Bill 2028: Qura or 1000$ fine

[Graylady]

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st02/st02028.htm

:clap:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IS0tvUQuyI

[Lt_Ripley]

hhhmmmm I can see the need for a quarantine and yet can see that also being used as an excuse to retain ...

[preacherman76]

Wow. Ask yourself this. If they can forcfully inject you, what cant they do to you??

[Wickian]

They are already are allowed to forcefully inject you. If you're a parent and you try to not let the state inject your child with vaccines, then you face serious legal backlashes.

[Mr Honeybadger]

How sad. More trampling of our Constitutional Rights.

And not only do some people welcome this, they actually applaud it.

Liberty vs. Authoritarian govt. Looks like the battle lines are starting to form.

[KRS-One]

Strong language in this bill.

(4) to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons;

...

8) to procure, take immediate possession from any source, store, or distribute any anti-toxins, serums, vaccines, immunizing agents, antibiotics, and other pharmaceutical agents or medical supplies located within the commonwealth as may be necessary to respond to the emergency

Given that when epidemic situations arise it grants full search and seizure of private property without a warrant on the sole discretion of local health officials. I'd be interested in someone with more experience in legal areas offering an opinion. Is this type of law on the books for other states and has precedent been set in such cases?

[preacherman76]

They are already are allowed to forcefully inject you. If you're a parent and you try to not let the state inject your child with vaccines, then you face serious legal backlashes.

Not true. There is no law that says a child has to be vaccinated at all. The only laws that say other wise are under martial law, which is illegal to begin with. They try to make you believe that there are laws, but it isnt true. NTM the 4th amendment gives you the right to be secure in your own person. If they come knockin at my door to forcfully inject me or any member of my family, the **** is going to hit the fan. Id rather die on my feet than on my knees.

Edited August 27, 2009 by preacherman76

[KRS-One]

Not true. There is no law that says a child has to be vaccinated at all. The only laws that say other wise are under martial law, which is illegal to begin with. They try to make you believe that there are laws, but it isnt true. NTM the 4th amendment gives you the right to be secure in your own person. If they come knockin at my door to forcfully inject me or any member of my family, the **** is going to hit the fan. Id rather die on my feet than on my knees.

Uh, Martial law isn't illegal. I mean, they wouldn't call it "law" if it was. In certain extreme situations the President has the ability to enforce a situation where martial law would take effect.

We were surprisingly close to it being declared after 9/11, actually. Once such a plan is put in place, all facets of civil liberty and justice come under control of the executive.

For example, Habeus Corpus is often closely related to martial law in the US. It allows suspension in times of great distress. You will note that George Bush suspended this right on an individual by individual basis. So, in a minor sense, you could say he enacted partial martial law himself. This was never legally challenged.

The Mayor of New Orleans imposed martial law on the city after hurricane Katrina and specifically mandated that officers did not have to follow civil liberty laws or uphold Miranda rights.

Martial law is a very real and very legal thing within the United States. Representing it as being far-fetched or a fallacy isn't correct.