Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Understanding Stonehenge: Two Explanations

understanding stonehenge

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1    Karlis

Karlis

  • Member
  • 8,614 posts
  • Joined:19 Jul 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:36 PM

The following proposed "solutions" as to why Stonehenge was built -- to unite a land or as a destination to heal the sick -- seem extremely improbable to me; *in my opinion*.

Please discuss,
Karlis
-=-=-=-


Was the prehistoric monument built to unite a land or as a destination to heal the sick?

The new laser findings appear to be compatible with two main theories taking shape in recent years to explain the monument's purpose.

According to archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson, head of the Stonehenge Riverside Project, the iconic monument was built as a grand act of union after a long period of conflict between east and west Britain.

Another theory, posed by archaeologists Geoff Wainwright and Timothy Darvill, says Stonehenge was a destination to which the sick traveled from around Europe to be healed by its magical powers.
Read more


#2    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 36,029 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:39 PM

Or, third option: the place to take the souls of the death for rebirth.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#3    Tutankhaten-pasheri

Tutankhaten-pasheri

    Buratinologist

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,637 posts
  • Joined:22 Sep 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:страна дураков

Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:47 PM

I would think as monument to, presumably, political union is not valid. Surely in those days that would be done by marrige. Is there even any evidence to suggest that such a large part of iron age Britain was a single kingdom? When Ceasar appeared they were certainly not "united". I think we will never know why it was built. The best we can do is make educated guesses and say that some form of astrological process was involved. Over the centuries the purpose may have changed anyway, for instance when the druid culture arrived.


#4    cormac mac airt

cormac mac airt

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,686 posts
  • Joined:18 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, USA

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:40 PM

If it was the first reason (act of union) it really wouldn't have had much, if any, impact on the rest of England IMO. Examples being the sites of Skara Brae and the Ness of Brodgar in Orkney, where the local societies appear to have done very well for themselves without needing an act of union.

cormac

The city and citizens, which you yesterday described to us in fiction, we will now transfer to the world of reality. It shall be the ancient city of Athens, and we will suppose that the citizens whom you imagined, were our veritable ancestors, of whom the priest spoke; they will perfectly harmonise, and there will be no inconsistency in saying that the citizens of your republic are these ancient Athenians. --  Plato's Timaeus

#5    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 36,029 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 12 October 2012 - 06:45 PM

View Postcormac mac airt, on 12 October 2012 - 06:40 PM, said:

If it was the first reason (act of union) it really wouldn't have had much, if any, impact on the rest of England IMO. Examples being the sites of Skara Brae and the Ness of Brodgar in Orkney, where the local societies appear to have done very well for themselves without needing an act of union.

cormac

Where the evidence of builder from all over Europe hardly speaks for a nationalistic endeavor, rather a scientific or spiritual one.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#6    Taun

Taun

    A dashing moose about town...

  • Member
  • 5,890 posts
  • Joined:19 May 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tornado Alley (Oklahoma)

Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:00 PM

I was always under the belief that Stonehenge was symbolic of death as an aspect of life and Woodhenge (which is nearby if I'm not mistaken) was symbolic of Life... both used for appropriate rituals by the same peoples...

It seems as though the person(s) coming up with this new idea may be projecting modern readings on a very ancient society - sort of an Ancient EU...


#7    JGirl

JGirl

    Pajama Goddess

  • Member
  • 9,016 posts
  • Joined:23 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:British Columbia Canada

Posted 12 October 2012 - 07:11 PM

every time i see a picture of stonehenge my mind says that it was a building. it had a roof over it, perhaps not all of it but i imagine a roofed building there. no i'm not psychic, i just get that impression. always did.


#8    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,111 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:42 PM

View PostKarlis, on 12 October 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

The following proposed "solutions" as to why Stonehenge was built -- to unite a land or as a destination to heal the sick -- seem extremely improbable to me; *in my opinion*.

Please discuss,
Karlis
-=-=-=-


Was the prehistoric monument built to unite a land or as a destination to heal the sick?

The new laser findings appear to be compatible with two main theories taking shape in recent years to explain the monument's purpose.

According to archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson, head of the Stonehenge Riverside Project, the iconic monument was built as a grand act of union after a long period of conflict between east and west Britain.

Another theory, posed by archaeologists Geoff Wainwright and Timothy Darvill, says Stonehenge was a destination to which the sick traveled from around Europe to be healed by its magical powers.
Read more

The Stonehenge site was already occupied around 7000 BC.

I didn't see that in the article.

I have said in the Doggerland thread that it might have been a 'death cult' from the start.

"Around 7000 BC" could as easily mean 6200 BC (taking the carbondating error into account), and the ones creating the site would have been refugees or survivors of the Storegga Tsunami that flooded Doggerland/island.


#9    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,111 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 30 October 2012 - 05:25 PM

View PostJGirl, on 12 October 2012 - 07:11 PM, said:

every time i see a picture of stonehenge my mind says that it was a building. it had a roof over it, perhaps not all of it but i imagine a roofed building there. no i'm not psychic, i just get that impression. always did.

Twelve reasons why Stonehenge was a building

http://structuralarc...ehenge-was.html





#10    JGirl

JGirl

    Pajama Goddess

  • Member
  • 9,016 posts
  • Joined:23 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:British Columbia Canada

Posted 30 October 2012 - 06:33 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 30 October 2012 - 05:25 PM, said:

Twelve reasons why Stonehenge was a building

http://structuralarc...ehenge-was.html



very interesting - thank you!
i dont' see how his theory has any less weight than the more accepted ones; it seemed that the one 'expert' that was willing to discuss his theory (in the first video) discounts it simply because it puts his own theory to question.
i must say i envisioned a roof system a bit different than that, but i'm no architect lol

Edited by JGirl, 30 October 2012 - 06:33 PM.


#11    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,111 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 30 October 2012 - 06:39 PM

Many times someone from a different discipline can come up with more sane and realistic ideas than historians do.

Architects,  engineers, chemists, and so on don't have that bias many historians have.

They tend to come up with practical solutions no historian would ever dream of.

But I am not saying that what I posted here today is the truth, it's just an alternative way of dealing with a 'mystery'.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 30 October 2012 - 06:39 PM.


#12    JGirl

JGirl

    Pajama Goddess

  • Member
  • 9,016 posts
  • Joined:23 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:British Columbia Canada

Posted 30 October 2012 - 06:42 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 30 October 2012 - 06:39 PM, said:

But I am not saying that what I posted here today is the truth, it's just an alternative way of dealing with a 'mystery'.

.
understood - the truth can't be known with regard to stonehenge unless more evidence or information/historical references are found. we can speculate all we like, armchair enthusiasts or professionals, but it's still speculation.
i like the idea of a roofed structure though, it makes more sense to me.


#13    Uncle Sam

Uncle Sam

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,360 posts
  • Joined:26 Jul 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

Posted 19 November 2012 - 02:40 PM

I always pondered if those stone hedges were buildings at one time, like a foundation, but the wood eroded away leaving the foundation still standing which baffles people today. Possibility the stone heads are foundations left over from an tribe that used it as a meeting hall of the locals there. *Shrugs.*

A man's ethical behaviour should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. - Albert Einstein

#14    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 11,206 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 19 November 2012 - 10:05 PM

According to the Maboginon it's a place where the Spirit realm and the Earthly one over lap, all the Gorsedds are.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#15    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 6,073 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:44 AM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 19 November 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:

According to the Maboginon it's a place where the Spirit realm and the Earthly one over lap, all the Gorsedds are.

  hmm  ya,  like a church?      .. and a sacred calendar too?  to keep track of  the other  heavenly beings  .. like the sun and moon and stars *  

probly called it   ' the 2nd cosmological church '       .. [ BINGO  Thursdays nights at 7:00 ]

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users