The Physics of Extra-Terrestrial Civilization

[Synergy]

The Physics of Extra-Terrestrial Civilizations

How advanced could they possibly be?

By Michio Kaku

The late Carl Sagan once asked this question, “What does it mean for a civilization to be a million years old? We have had radio telescopes and spaceships for a few decades; our technical civilization is a few hundred years old... an advanced civilization millions of years old is as much beyond us as we are beyond a bush baby or a macaque.”

Although any conjecture about such advanced civilizations is a matter of sheer speculation, one can still use the laws of physics to place upper and lower limits on these civilizations. In particular, now that the laws of quantum field theory, general relativity, thermodynamics, etc. are fairly well-established, physics can impose broad physical bounds which constrain the parameters of these civilizations.

This question is no longer a matter of idle speculation. Soon, humanity may face an existential shock as the current list of a dozen Jupiter-sized extra-solar planets swells to hundreds of earth-sized planets, almost identical twins of our celestial homeland. This may usher in a new era in our relationship with the universe: we will never see the night sky in the same way ever again, realizing that scientists may eventually compile an encyclopedia identifying the precise co-ordinates of perhaps hundreds of earth-like planets.

Today, every few weeks brings news of a new Jupiter-sized extra-solar planet being discovered, the latest being about 15 light years away orbiting around the star Gliese 876. The most spectacular of these findings was photographed by the Hubble Space Telescope, which captured breathtaking photos of a planet 450 light years away being sling-shot into space by a double-star system.

But the best is yet to come. Early in the next decade, scientists will launch a new kind of telescope, the interferome try space telescope, which uses the interference of light beams to enhance the resolving power of telescopes.

For example, the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM), to be launched early in the next decade, consists of multiple telescopes placed along a 30 foot structure. With an unprecedented resolution approaching the physical limits of optics, the SIM is so sensitive that it almost defies belief: orbiting the earth, it can detect the motion of a lantern being waved by an astronaut on Mars!

The SIM, in turn, will pave the way for the Terrestrial Planet Finder, to be launched late in the next decade, which should identify even more earth-like planets. It will scan the brightest 1,000 stars within 50 light years of the earth and will focus on the 50 to 100 brightest planetary systems.

All this, in turn, will stimulate an active effort to determine if any of them harbor life, perhaps some with civilizations more advanced than ours.

Although it is impossible to predict the precise features of such advanced civilizations, their broad outlines can be analyzed using the laws of physics. No matter how many millions of years separate us from them, they still must obey the iron laws of physics, which are now advanced enough to explain everything from sub-atomic particles to the large-scale structure of the universe, through a staggering 43 orders of magnitude.

Physics of Type I, II, and III Civilizations

Specifically, we can rank civilizations by their energy consumption, using the following principles:

1) The laws of thermodynamics. Even an advanced civilization is bound by the laws of thermodynamics, especially the Second Law, and can hence be ranked by the energy at their disposal.

2) The laws of stable matter. Baryonic matter (e.g. based on protons and neutrons) tends to clump into three large groupings: planets, stars and galaxies. (This is a well-defined by product of stellar and galactic evolution, thermonuclear fusion, etc.) Thus, their energy will also be based on three distinct types, and this places upper limits on their rate of energy consumption.

3) The laws of planetary evolution. Any advanced civilization must grow in energy consumption faster than the frequency of life-threatening catastrophes (e.g. meteor impacts, ice ages, supernovas, etc.). If they grow any slower, they are doomed to extinction. This places mathematical lower limits on the rate of growth of these civilizations.

In a seminal paper published in 1964 in the Journal of Soviet Astronomy, Russian astrophysicist Nicolai Kardashev theorized that advanced civilizations must therefore be grouped according to three types: Type I, II, and III, which have mastered planetary, stellar and galactic forms of energy, respectively. He calculated that the energy consumption of these three types of civilization would be separated by a factor of many billions. But how long will it take to reach Type II and III status?

Shorter than most realize.

Berkeley astronomer Don Goldsmith reminds us that the earth receives about one billionth of the suns energy, and that humans utilize about one millionth of that. So we consume about one million billionth of the suns total energy. At present, our entire planetary energy production is about 10 billion billion ergs per second. But our energy growth is rising exponentially, and hence we can calculate how long it will take to rise to Type II or III status.

Goldsmith says, “Look how far we have come in energy uses once we figured out how to manipulate energy, how to get fossil fuels really going, and how to create electrical power from hydropower, and so forth; we've come up in energy uses in a remarkable amount in just a couple of centuries compared to billions of years our planet has been here ... and this same sort of thing may apply to other civilizations.”

Physicist Freeman Dyson of the Institute for Advanced Study estimates that, within 200 years or so, we should attain Type I status. In fact, growing at a modest rate of 1% per year, Kardashev estimated that it would take only 3,200 years to reach Type II status, and 5,800 years to reach Type III status. Living in a Type I,II, or III civilization

For example, a Type I civilization is a truly planetary one, which has mastered most forms of planetary energy. Their energy output may be on the order of thousands to millions of times our current planetary output. Mark Twain once said, ”Everyone complains about the weather, but no one does anything about it.“ This may change with a Type I civilization, which has enough energy to modify the weather. They also have enough energy to alter the course of earthquakes, volcanoes, and build cities on their oceans.

Currently, our energy output qualifies us for Type 0 status. We derive our energy not from harnessing global forces, but by burning dead plants (e.g. oil and coal). But already, we can see the seeds of a Type I civilization. We see the beginning of a planetary language (English), a planetary communication system (the Internet), a planetary economy (the forging of the European Union), and even the beginnings of a planetary culture (via mass media, TV, rock music, and Hollywood films).

By definition, an advanced civilization must grow faster than the frequency of life-threatening catastrophes. Since large meteor and comet impacts take place once every few thousand years, a Type I civilization must master space travel to deflect space debris within that time frame, which should not be much of a problem. Ice ages may take place on a time scale of tens of thousands of years, so a Type I civilization must learn to modify the weather within that time frame.

Artificial and internal catastrophes must also be negotiated. But the problem of global pollution is only a mortal threat for a Type 0 civilization; a Type I civilization has lived for several millennia as a planetary civilization, necessarily achieving ecological planetary balance. Internal problems like wars do pose a serious recurring threat, but they have thousands of years in which to solve racial, national, and sectarian conflicts.

Eventually, after several thousand years, a Type I civilization will exhaust the power of a planet, and will derive their energy by consuming the entire output of their suns energy, or roughly a billion trillion trillion ergs per second.

With their energy output comparable to that of a small star, they should be visible from space. Dyson has proposed that a Type II civilization may even build a gigantic sphere around their star to more efficiently utilize its total energy output. Even if they try to conceal their existence, they must, by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, emit waste heat. From outer space, their planet may glow like a Christmas tree ornament. Dyson has even proposed looking specifically for infrared emissions (rather than radio and TV) to identify these Type II civilizations.

Perhaps the only serious threat to a Type II civilization would be a nearby supernova explosion, whose sudden eruption could scorch their planet in a withering blast of X-rays, killing all life forms. Thus, perhaps the most interesting civilization is a Type III civilization, for it is truly immortal. They have exhausted the power of a single star, and have reached for other star systems. No natural catastrophe known to science is capable of destroying a Type III civilization.

Faced with a neighboring supernova, it would have several alternatives, such as altering the evolution of dying red giant star which is about to explode, or leaving this particular star system and terraforming a nearby planetary system.

However, there are roadblocks to an emerging Type III civilization. Eventually, it bumps up against another iron law of physics, the theory of relativity. Dyson estimates that this may delay the transition to a Type III civilization by perhaps millions of years.

But even with the light barrier, there are a number of ways of expanding at near-light velocities. For example, the ultimate measure of a rockets capability is measured by something called “specific impulse” (defined as the product of the thrust and the duration, measured in units of seconds). Chemical rockets can attain specific impulses of several hundred to several thousand seconds. Ion engines can attain specific impulses of tens of thousands of seconds. But to attain near-light speed velocity, one has to achieve specific impulse of about 30 million seconds, which is far beyond our current capability, but not that of a Type III civilization. A variety of propulsion systems would be available for sub-light speed probes (such as ram-jet fusion engines, photonic engines, etc.)

How to Explore the Galaxy

Because distances between stars are so vast, and the number of unsuitable, lifeless solar systems so large, a Type III civilization would be faced with the next question: what is the mathematically most efficient way of exploring the hundreds of billions of stars in the galaxy?

In science fiction, the search for inhabitable worlds has been immortalized on TV by heroic captains boldly commanding a lone star ship, or as the murderous Borg, a Type III civilization which absorbs lower Type II civilization (such as the Federation). However, the most mathematically efficient method to explore space is far less glamorous: to send fleets of “Von Neumann probes” throughout the galaxy (named after John Von Neumann, who established the mathematical laws of self-replicating systems).

A Von Neumann probe is a robot designed to reach distant star systems and create factories which will reproduce copies themselves by the thousands. A dead moon rather than a planet makes the ideal destination for Von Neumann probes, since they can easily land and take off from these moons, and also because these moons have no erosion. These probes would live off the land, using naturally occurring deposits of iron, nickel, etc. to create the raw ingredients to build a robot factory. They would create thousands of copies of themselves, which would then scatter and search for other star systems.

Similar to a virus colonizing a body many times its size, eventually there would be a sphere of trillions of Von Neumann probes expanding in all directions, increasing at a fraction of the speed of light. In this fashion, even a galaxy 100,000 light years across may be completely analyzed within, say, a half million years.

If a Von Neumann probe only finds evidence of primitive life (such as an unstable, savage Type 0 civilization) they might simply lie dormant on the moon, silently waiting for the Type 0 civilization to evolve into a stable Type I civilization. After waiting quietly for several millennia, they may be activated when the emerging Type I civilization is advanced enough to set up a lunar colony. Physicist Paul Davies of the University of Adelaide has even raised the possibility of a Von Neumann probe resting on our own moon, left over from a previous visitation in our system aeons ago.

(If this sounds a bit familiar, that's because it was the basis of the film, 2001. Originally, Stanley Kubrick began the film with a series of scientists explaining how probes like these would be the most efficient method of exploring outer space. Unfortunately, at the last minute, Kubrick cut the opening segment from his film, and these monoliths became almost mystical entities)

New Developments

Since Kardashev gave the original ranking of civilizations, there have been many scientific developments which refine and extend his original analysis, such as recent developments in nanotechnology, biotechnology, quantum physics, etc.

For example, nanotechnology may facilitate the development of Von Neumann probes. As physicist Richard Feynman observed in his seminal essay, “There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” there is nothing in the laws of physics which prevents building armies of molecular-sized machines. At present, scientists have already built atomic-sized curiosities, such as an atomic abacus with Buckyballs and an atomic guitar with strings about 100 atoms across.

Paul Davies speculates that a space-faring civilization could use nanotechnology to build miniature probes to explore the galaxy, perhaps no bigger than your palm. Davies says, “The tiny probes I'm talking about will be so inconspicuous that it's no surprise that we haven't come across one. It's not the sort of thing that you're going to trip over in your back yard. So if that is the way technology develops, namely, smaller, faster, cheaper and if other civilizations have gone this route, then we could be surrounded by surveillance devices.”

Furthermore, the development of biotechnology has opened entirely new possibilities. These probes may act as life-forms, reproducing their genetic information, mutating and evolving at each stage of reproduction to enhance their capabilities, and may have artificial intelligence to accelerate their search.

Also, information theory modifies the original Kardashev analysis. The current SETI project only scans a few frequencies of radio and TV emissions sent by a Type 0 civilization, but perhaps not an advanced civilization. Because of the enormous static found in deep space, broadcasting on a single frequency presents a serious source of error. Instead of putting all your eggs in one basket, a more efficient system is to break up the message and smear it out over all frequencies (e.g. via Fourier like transform) and then reassemble the signal only at the other end. In this way, even if certain frequencies are disrupted by static, enough of the message will survive to accurately reassemble the message via error correction routines. However, any Type 0 civilization listening in on the message on one frequency band would only hear nonsense. In other words, our galaxy could be teeming with messages from various Type II and III civilizations, but our Type 0 radio telescopes would only hear gibberish.

Lastly, there is also the possibility that a Type II or Type III civilization might be able to reach the fabled Planck energy with their machines (10^19 billion electron volts). This is energy is a quadrillion times larger than our most powerful atom smasher. This energy, as fantastic as it may seem, is (by definition) within the range of a Type II or III civilization.

The Planck energy only occurs at the center of black holes and the instant of the Big Bang. But with recent advances in quantum gravity and superstring theory, there is renewed interest among physicists about energies so vast that quantum effects rip apart the fabric of space and time. Although it is by no means certain that quantum physics allows for stable wormholes, this raises the remote possibility that a sufficiently advanced civilizations may be able to move via holes in space, like Alice's Looking Glass. And if these civilizations can successfully navigate through stable wormholes, then attaining a specific impulse of a million seconds is no longer a problem. They merely take a short-cut through the galaxy. This would greatly cut down the transition between a Type II and Type III civilization.

Second, the ability to tear holes in space and time may come in handy one day. Astronomers, analyzing light from distant supernovas, have concluded recently that the universe may be accelerating, rather than slowing down. If this is true, there may be an anti-gravity force (perhaps Einstein's cosmological constant) which is counteracting the gravitational attraction of distant galaxies. But this also means that the universe might expand forever in a Big Chill, until temperatures approach near-absolute zero. Several papers have recently laid out what such a dismal universe may look like. It will be a pitiful sight: any civilization which survives will be desperately huddled next to the dying embers of fading neutron stars and black holes. All intelligent life must die when the universe dies.

Contemplating the death of the sun, the philosopher Bertrand Russel once wrote perhaps the most depressing paragraph in the English language: “...All the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and the whole temple of Mans achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins...”

Today, we realize that sufficiently powerful rockets may spare us from the death of our sun 5 billion years from now, when the oceans will boil and the mountains will melt. But how do we escape the death of the universe itself?

Astronomer John Barrows of the University of Sussex writes, “Suppose that we extend the classification upwards. Members of these hypothetical civilizations of Type IV, V, VI, ... and so on, would be able to manipulate the structures in the universe on larger and larger scales, encompassing groups of galaxies, clusters, and superclusters of galaxies.” Civilizations beyond Type III may have enough energy to escape our dying universe via holes in space.

Lastly, physicist Alan Guth of MIT, one of the originators of the inflationary universe theory, has even computed the energy necessary to create a baby universe in the laboratory (the temperature is 1,000 trillion degrees, which is within the range of these hypothetical civilizations).

Of course, until someone actually makes contact with an advanced civilization, all of this amounts to speculation tempered with the laws of physics, no more than a useful guide in our search for extra-terrestrial intelligence. But one day, many of us will gaze at the encyclopedia containing the coordinates of perhaps hundreds of earth-like planets in our sector of the galaxy. Then we will wonder, as Sagan did, what a civilization a millions years ahead of ours will look like...

Source: http://mkaku.org/article_physicsofextra.htm

[whoa182]

Thanks for sharing that, that was good

[RabidCat]

It all assumes the "laws of physics" are "laws". It is quite possible, even probable, that those 'laws' are not laws, merely convenient explanations.

Many people have either broken the laws or circumvented same.

Which would, in some cases, force a rethink of the energy requirements.

Edited August 16, 2006 by RabidCat

[Shuriken]

Many people have either broken the laws or circumvented same.

I'll by u a bear if you brake the law of gravity

[RabidCat]

I'll by u a bear if you brake the law of gravity

Well...

There was a guy who built a castle in Florida. Called the Coral Castle. There are no reasonable explanations of how he did it, just a bunch of supposition. Even engineers are puzzled (no nonsense about his ropes and pulleys, please). Name was Leedskalnin, claimed to have the knowledge of how the pyramids were built. He weighed less than 100 pounds.

Every heard of the party lift?

Tesla and the Nazi air(?)craft?

T. T. Brown? (the Biefeld-Brown effect).

John Searle?

Laithwaite?

Schauberger?

(a touch of humor): Jesus Christ?

I want my bear.

Edited August 18, 2006 by RabidCat

[Bella-Angelique]

if other civilizations have gone this route, then we could be surrounded by surveillance devices.”

These probes may act as life-forms

a sufficiently advanced civilizations may be able to move via holes in space, like Alice's Looking Glass.

Civilizations beyond Type III may have enough energy to escape our dying universe via holes in space.

the energy necessary to create a baby universe in the laboratory (the temperature is 1,000 trillion degrees, which is within the range of these hypothetical civilizations

When I was a child, I spake as a child,

I understood as a child, I thought as a child:

but when I became a man, I put away

childish things. For now we see through a

glass, darkly; but then face to face: now

I know in part; but then shall I know even

as also I am known.

[RabidCat]

When I was a child, I spake as a child,

I understood as a child, I thought as a child:

but when I became a man, I put away

childish things. For now we see through a

glass, darkly; but then face to face: now

I know in part; but then shall I know even

as also I am known.

So true. So true.

[esaruoho]

Well...

There was a guy who built a castle in Florida. Called the Coral Castle. There are no reasonable explanations of how he did it, just a bunch of supposition. Even engineers are puzzled (no nonsense about his ropes and pulleys, please). Name was Leedskalnin, claimed to have the knowledge of how the pyramids were built. He weighed less than 100 pounds.

hi. Leedskalnin did write and publish booklets of his ideas about the magnetic current. one of them is called the magnetic current. In it, he details experiments that one can try out, to understand what he meant in regards magnetism, and how all matter is composed of north and south pole magnets. there is also a website. however, again, its easier to say "theres a mystery" and "lots of theories" - but its way harder to take the point of view of reading what he published, and understanding the underlying matter. for a while now ive been thinking of finding a source of income, and then videoing the experiments, just to see what would happen (and to produce something "new" to/for the alternative ideas about magnetism-scene), however i have not yet managed. i did however find this person's page on PESWiki, heres this guys magnetic current/leedskalnin page that he created on PESWiki. its got asmall shoppinglist and pictures on the leedskalnin magnetic current thing. enjoy.

[Legatus Legionis]

i have enjoyed reading your article. it was pretty interesting

[Spunned]

Thanks for sharing

[Under the surface]

Like RabidCat said, that's assuming the laws of physics are correct. The truth is they are not. In 1936, Albert Roy Davis discovered that the North pole of a magnet has the opposite effect of the South pole. That's contrary to Faraday's conclusions, which are the basic principles of magnetism in physics today.

Now I'm not the most knowledgable person when it comes to physics, but I can see how considering magnetic energy to be one type of energy with one effect on matter can throw scientists off track. The North pole magnetic field has a counterclockwise spin and causes a contraction of matter. The South pole has a clockwise spin and will expand matter. This shows strong evidence that the universe isn't expanding, but contracting and expanding simultaneously. By placing a magnet against the screen of a cathode ray tube you can visually see the spin of the magnetic energies.

So why has this discovery continued to be denied by scientists within the government? It has been proven and verified by thousands of researchers worldwide, but it's still not taught this way in schools. Here is a conspiracy that is easy to prove.

[StarMountainKid]

Great article, thanks for sharing it.

[esaruoho]

Like RabidCat said, that's assuming the laws of physics are correct. The truth is they are not. In 1936, Albert Roy Davis discovered that the North pole of a magnet has the opposite effect of the South pole. That's contrary to Faraday's conclusions, which are the basic principles of magnetism in physics today.

Now I'm not the most knowledgable person when it comes to physics, but I can see how considering magnetic energy to be one type of energy with one effect on matter can throw scientists off track. The North pole magnetic field has a counterclockwise spin and causes a contraction of matter. The South pole has a clockwise spin and will expand matter. This shows strong evidence that the universe isn't expanding, but contracting and expanding simultaneously. By placing a magnet against the screen of a cathode ray tube you can visually see the spin of the magnetic energies.

So why has this discovery continued to be denied by scientists within the government? It has been proven and verified by thousands of researchers worldwide, but it's still not taught this way in schools. Here is a conspiracy that is easy to prove.

Dr. Konstantin Meyl speaks of this - that there must be a vortex, AND an anti-vortex, i.e. expansion and contraction, that are in a balance, and this is what science is missing, and instead postulates other things (each area of physics postulates other things to explain, like dark matter and dark energy etc - to maintain the balance of having only the exploding force, nothing else).

howard johnson even published a book on the counterclockwise+contraction and clockwise+expansion of magnets, but who is listening to him? the books name is The Secret World of Magnets, and is still in print from cheniere.org.

again, ed leedskalnin comes to play in this, so does walter russell.

and now steorn with their Magnetic Viscosity thing.. look up merlib.org and youll see.

enjoy.

[Under the surface]

Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls, his associate, wrote "Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System", published in 1974. They describe some of the early experiments that proved the differences of the two poles, and their effects on animals and people.

I read a little about Howard Johnson's work. He seems to indicate he discovered the differences. In the November 1968 issue of "Scientific American", the magnetic fields of the earth were "mistakenly" measured and printed, on page 91, similar to the way Johnson draws them. He is wrong in that he shows two vortices at each pole. Davis says there is one, and the magnetic energy from one pole circles around to the center of the magnet where it changes polarity. The magnetism travels back and forth from pole to pole simultaneously, forming a figure eight. I wonder if he saw the article and then began to research the differences. Though, Davis had informed many scientists and doctors from all over the world about some of his discoveries long before publishing his first book. Do you know when Johnson says he discovered the vortices?

Edited May 11, 2007 by Under the surface

[Leonardo]

Like RabidCat said, that's assuming the laws of physics are correct. The truth is they are not. In 1936, Albert Roy Davis discovered that the North pole of a magnet has the opposite effect of the South pole. That's contrary to Faraday's conclusions, which are the basic principles of magnetism in physics today.

Now I'm not the most knowledgable person when it comes to physics, but I can see how considering magnetic energy to be one type of energy with one effect on matter can throw scientists off track. The North pole magnetic field has a counterclockwise spin and causes a contraction of matter. The South pole has a clockwise spin and will expand matter. This shows strong evidence that the universe isn't expanding, but contracting and expanding simultaneously. By placing a magnet against the screen of a cathode ray tube you can visually see the spin of the magnetic energies.

So why has this discovery continued to be denied by scientists within the government? It has been proven and verified by thousands of researchers worldwide, but it's still not taught this way in schools. Here is a conspiracy that is easy to prove.

If you have a link to any of these hypotheses I'd appreciate it...

As for the cathode ray 'proof', I'm afraid the phenomenon of the 'swirling electrons' demonstrated in this is well known in the currently accepted theory of magnetism and is the result of the force on any charged particle entering a magnetic field being perpendicular to that field and the direction of movement of the charge. It is known as Fleming's Left-Hand Rule.

Edited May 12, 2007 by Leonardo

[Under the surface]

John C. Brandt, chief of the Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics at the Goddard Space Flight Center, in Greenbelt, Md., described in an article in 1985, titled "Comet probe appears to confirm 'dirty' theory", that a spacecraft, the the International Cometary Explorer spent 20 minutes inside the tail of comet Giacobini-Zinner and it looked like they thought it should. It seemed to consist of two lobes with magnetic fields in opposite directions and they were separated by a magnetically neutral sheet. That's the Bloch Wall he described, the point at the center of all magnets where there is no measurable magnetism. Check out "Science Spectra", issue 13, 1998. There is a picture of supernova, and next to it is a diagram of magnetic fields spinning in opposite directions. Check out the front cover of "Science" magazine, July 29, 1988 (Vol. 241). There's a picture of a planet being formed, and a giant figure eight. The figure eight is found throughout nature. Here's an article about how Davis discovered the two pole effects. http://www.magnetlabs.com/articles/biomagrev.htm