I am very skeptical of a lot of things, and yeah it would be cool from time to time to have a photograph, but think, when let's say a baby laughs for the first time, do you instantly photograph the child? When your friend does an awesome bike trick, do you instantly take pictures? I think the best thing to go on is the number of witnesses and the stability of their stories. If all the town Police Officers report a triangle of lights revolving around a field, that is more believable than some unemployed guy named Bob snapping a picture. In the digital age, I think the spoken word is a lot more believable than images. A few decades ago, it was don't believe everything you hear and half of what you see. Now it is very easy for somebody to create a good picture.
Why Do There Need to Be Pictures?
A thought
Started by Sketch , Nov 30 2003 04:28 PM
Started by Sketch , Nov 30 2003 04:28 PM
2 replies to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











